Privacy and property in the global datasphere

Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 94-107

  Burk, Dan L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56549115763     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-310-4.ch007     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Alford, W. P. (1995). To steal a book is an elegant offense: Intellectual property law in Chinese civilization. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
2. Boyle, J. (1996). Shamans, software and spleens. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. nd ed.). Pretoria: National Library of South Africa.
4. Burk, D. (1999). Virtual exit in the global information economy. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 73, 943-995.
5. Burk, D. (1999b). Cyberlaw and the norms of science. Boston College Intellectual Property and Technology Forum 1999. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://infoeagle.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/law/st_org/iptf/commentary/content/burk.html
6. Chan, Y. (2000). Privacy in the family: Its hierarchical and asymmetric nature. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31, 1-17.
7. Chander, A., & Sunder, M. (2004). The romance of the public domain. California Law Review, 92, 1331-1374.
8. Cohen, J. E. (2000). Examined lives: Informational privacy and the subject as object. Stanford Law Review, 52, 1373-1438.
9. Coombe, R. J. (1998). The cultural life of intellectual properties: Authorship, appropriation, and the law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10. Dietz, A. (1995). The moral right of the author: Moral rights and the civil law countries. ColumbiaVLA Journal of Law & the Arts, 19, 206-212.
11. Drahos, P. (1996). A philosophy of intellectual property. Brookfield, UK: Dartmouth.
12. Gana, R. L. (1995). Has creativity died in the third world? Some implications of the internationalization of intellectual property. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 24, 109-144.
13. Geller, P. E. (1994). Legal transplants in international copyright: Some problems of method. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 13, 199-230.
14. Ginsburg, J. C. (1990). A tale of two copyrights: Literary property in revolutionary France and America. Tulane Law Review, 64, 991-1031.
15. Hamilton, M. A. (1996). The TRIPs agreement: Imperialistic, outdated, and overprotective. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 29, 613-634.
16. Helfer, L. (1998). Adjudicating copyright claims under the TRIPs agreement: The case for a European human rights analogy. Harvard Journal of International Law, 49, 357-437.
17. Hughes, J. (1988). The philosophy of intellectual property. Georgetown Law Review, 77, 287-291.
18. Komuro, N. (1995). The WTO dispute settlement mechanism: Coverage and procedures of the WTO understanding. Journal of International Arbitration, 12, 81-171.
19. Kuruk, P. (1999). Protecting folklore under modern intellectual property regimes: A reappraisal of the tensions between individual and communal rights in Africa and the United States. American University Law Review, 48, 769-849.
20. Kwamwangamalu, N. M., & Nkonko, M. (1999). Ubuntu in South Africa: A sociolinguistic perspective to a Pan-African concept. Critical Arts Journal, 13, 24-42.
21. Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (1989). An economic analysis of copyright law. Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 325-363.
22. Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyber-space. New York: Basic Books.
23. Louw, D. J. (2001). Ubuntu and the challenges of multiculturalism in post-apartheid South Africa. Quest: African Journal of Philosophy, XV(1-2), 15-36.
24. Lü, Y. (2005). Privacy and data privacy issues in contemporary China. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 7-15.
25. Mizutani, M., Dorsey, J., & Moor, J. (2004). The Internet and Japanese conception of privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(2), 121-28.
26. Netanel, N. (1993). Copyright alienability restrictions and the enhancement of author autonomy: A normative evaluation. Rutgers Law Journal, 24, 347-442.
27. th International Conference on Information Ethics: Philosophical Inquiries, Twente, The Netherlands (pp. 292-306).
28. Posner, R. (1978). The right of privacy. Georgia Law Review, 12, 393-422.
29. Reichman, J. H. (1995). Beyond the historical lines of demarcation: Competition law, intellectual property rights, and international trade after the GATT's Uruguay round. The International Lawyer, 29, 388-483.
30. Reidenberg, J. R. (1998). Lex informatica: The formulation of information policy rules through technology. Texas Law Review, 76, 553-593.
31. Reidenberg, J. R. (2000). Resolving conflicting international data privacy rules in cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 52, 1315-1371.
32. Ricketson, S. (1987). The Berne Convention for the protection of literary and artistic works: 1886-1986. London: Kluwer.
33. Stromholm, S. (1983). Droit moral-The international and comparative scene from a Scandinavian viewpoint. International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, 14, 1-35.
34. Swire, P., & Litan, R. (1998). None of your business: World data flows, electronic commerce, and the European privacy directive. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.