Informational Privacy: Concepts, Theories, and Controversies

The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 131-164

  Tavani, Herman T ^a,b,c  

^a RIVIER COLLEGE   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Informational privacy concepts, theories, and controversies; Informational privacy theories; Technology based controversies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889497445     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470281819.ch6     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Adam, A. (2005). Chips in our children: can we inscribe privacy protection in a machine. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 233-242.
2. Alfino, M. (2001). Misplacing privacy. Journal of Information Ethics, 10(1), 5-8.
3. Allen, A. (1988). Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women in a Free Society. Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ
4. Allen, A. (2003). Why Privacy Isn't Everything: Feminist Reflections on Personal Accountability. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD
5. Baumer, D., Earp, J.B., and Payton, F.C. (2006). Privacy of medical records: IT implications of HIPAA. In: Tavani, H.T. (Ed.), Ethics, Computing, and Genomics. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, pp. 137-152.
6. Benn, S. I. (1971). Privacy, freedom and respect for persons. In: Pennock, J.R. and Chapman, J. W. (Eds.), Nomos XIII: Privacy. Atherton Press, New York.
7. Bok, S. (1983). Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. Pantheon Books, New York
8. Boyd v. United States (1886). 116 U.S. 186.
9. Brandeis, L.D. (1928). Olmstead v. United States. (277 U.S. 438). Dissenting opinion.
10. Branscomb, A. (1994). Who Owns Information? From Privacy to Public Access. Harper Collins, New York.
11. Brennan, W. (1972). Eisenstadt v. Baird. (405 U.S. 438). Majority opinion.
12. Burnham, D. (1983). The Rise of the Computer State. Random House, New York.
13. Clarke, R. (1999). Internet privacy concerns confirm the case for intervention. Communications of the ACM, 42(2), 60-67.
14. Cooley, T. (1880). A Treatise on the Law of Torts. Callaghan, Chicago
15. Custers, B. (2006). Epidemiological data mining. In: Tavani, H.T. (Ed.), Ethics, Computing, and Genomics. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, pp. 153-165.
16. DeCew, J.W. (1997). In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
17. DeCew, J.W. (2006). Privacy and policy for genetic research. In: Tavani, H.T. (Ed.), Ethics, Computing, and Genomics. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, pp. 121-136.
18. DeMay v. Roberts (1881). 46 U.S. 160.
19. Douglas, W.O. (1965). Griswold v. Connecticut. (381 U.S. 479). Majority opinion.
20. Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972). 405 U.S. 438.
21. Elgesem, D. (2004). The structure of rights in directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data. In: Spinello, R.A. and Tavani, H.T. (Eds.), Readings in Cyber Ethics. 2nd edition. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, pp. 418-435.
22. Etzioni, A. (1999). The Limits of Privacy. Basic Books, New York
23. Flaherty, D.H. (1989). Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC
24. Floridi, L. (1999). Information ethics: on the philosophical foundations of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(1), 37-56.
25. Floridi, L. (2005). The ontological interpretation of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(1), 185-200.
26. Floridi, L. (2006). Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(3), 109-119.
27. Freund, P.A. (1971). Privacy: one concept or many. In: Pennock, J. R. and Chapman, J.W. (Eds.), Nomos XIII: Privacy. Atherton Press, New York, pp. 182-198.
28. Fried, C. (1990). Privacy. In: Ermann, M.D., Williams, M.B., and Gutierrez, C. (Eds.), Computers, Ethics, and Society. Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 51-67.
29. Fulda, J.S. (2004). Data mining and privacy. In: Spinello, R.A. and Tavani, H.T. (Eds.), Readings in Cyber Ethics, 2nd edition. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, pp. 471-475.
30. Gavison, R. (1980). Privacy and the limits of the law. Yale Law Journal, 89, 421-471.
31. Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). 381 U.S. 479.
32. Grodzinsky, F.S. and Tavani, H.T. (2005). P2P networks and the Verizon v. RIAA case: implications for personal privacy and intellectual property. Ethics and Information Technology 7(4), 243-250.
33. Henkin, L. (1974). Privacy and autonomy. Columbia Law Review, 77, 1410-1425.
34. Himma, K.E. (2008). Privacy vs. security. San Diego Law Review, in press.
35. Hofstadter, S.H. and Horowitz, G. (1964). The Right to Privacy. Central Books, New York
36. Hunter, L. (1995). Public image. In: Johnson, D.G. and Nissenbaum, H. (Eds.), Computers, Ethics and Social Values. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 293-299.
37. Inness, J. (1992). Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation. Oxford University Press, New York
38. Introna, L. (2004). Workplace surveillance, privacy, and distributive justice. In: Spinello, R.A. and Tavani, H.T. (Eds.), Readings in Cyber Ethics, 2nd edition. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, pp. 476-487.
39. Johnson, D.G. (1994). Computer Ethics., 2nd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
40. Johnson, D.G. and Nissenbaum, H. (1995). Privacy and databases. Computers, Ethics and Social Values. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 262-268.
41. Katz v. United States (1967). 389 U.S. 347.
42. Kemp, R. and Moore, A.D. (2007). Privacy. In: Himma, K.E. (Ed.), Information Ethics. Special issue of Library Hi Tech, 25(1), 58-78.
43. Lockton, V. and Rosenberg, R.S. (2005). RFID: the next serious threat to privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 221-231.
44. MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
45. McCloskey, H.J. (1985). Privacy and the right to privacy. In: Purtill, R.L. (Ed.), Moral Dilemmas: Readings in Ethics and Social Philosophy. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, pp. 342-357.
46. Miller, A.R. (1971). The Assault on Privacy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
47. Moor, J.H. (1990). The ethics of privacy protection. Library Trends, 39(1-2), 69-82.
48. Moor, J.H. (1997). Towards a theory of privacy in the information age. Computers and Society, 27(3), 27-32.
49. Moor, J.H. (1999). Just consequentialism and computing. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(1), 65-69.
50. Moor, J.H. (2004). Reason, relativity, and responsibility in computer ethics. In: Spinello, R.A. and Tavani, H.T. (Eds.), Readings in Cyber Ethics, 2nd edition. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, pp. 40-54.
51. Moor, J.H. (2006). Using genetic information while protecting the privacy of the soul. In: Tavani, H.T. (Ed.), Ethics, Computing, and Genomics, Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, pp. 109-119.
52. Moore, A.D. (2003). Privacy: its meaning and value. American Philosophical Quarterly, 40, 215-227.
53. Moore, A.D. (2008). Towards informational privacy rights. San Diego Law Review, in press.
54. Moore, B. (1984). Privacy: Studies in Social and Cultural History., M.E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk, NY.
55. Nissenbaum, H. (1997). Toward an approach to privacy in public: challenges of information technology. Ethics and Behavior, 7(3), 207-219.
56. Nissenbaum, H. (1998). Protecting privacy in an information age. Law and Philosophy, 17, 559-596.
57. Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 119-157.
58. Olmstead v. United States (1928). 277 U.S. 438.
59. O'Neill, O. (2002). Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
60. Parent, W.A. (1983a). Privacy, morality and the law. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12(4), 269-288.
61. Parent, W.A. (1983b). A new definition of privacy for the law. Law and Philosophy, 2, 305-338.
62. Posner, R.A. (1978). An economic theory of privacy. Regulations, May-June, 19-26.
63. Rachels, J. (1975). Why privacy is important. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4(4), 323-333.
64. Regan, P.M. (1995). Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Values, and Public Policy. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC
65. Reiman, J.H. (1976). Privacy, intimacy, and personhood. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(1), 26-44.
66. Roe v. Wade (1973). 410 U.S. 153.
67. Rosen, J. (2000). The Unwanted Gaze: The Destruction of Privacy in America. Random House, New York
68. Rudinow, J. and Graybosch, A. (Eds). (2002). Ethics and Values in the Information Age. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA
69. Scanlon, T. (1975). Thompson on privacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4(4), 315-322.
70. Schoeman, F. (1992). Privacy and Social Freedom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
71. Solove, D. (2002). Conceptualizing privacy. California Law Review, 90, 1087-1155.
72. Spinello, R.A. (1997). The end of privacy. America, 176, 9-13. Reprinted in: Long, R.E. (Ed.), Rights to Privacy. H. W. Wilson Co., New York, pp. 25-32.
73. Spinello, R.A. (2002). Electronic mail and panoptic power in the workplace. In: Rudinow, J. and Graybosch, A. (Eds.), Ethics and Values in the Information Age. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, pp. 303-311.
74. Spinello, R.A. (2006). Property rights in genetic information. In: Tavani, H.T. (Ed.), Ethics, Computing, and Genomics. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, pp. 213-233.
75. Tavani, H.T. (1999). Informational privacy, data mining, and the internet. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(2), 137-145.
76. Tavani, H.T. (2000). Privacy and security. In: Langford, D. (Ed.), Internet Ethics. Macmillan, London, pp. 65-95.
77. Tavani, H.T. (2004a, 2007a). Ethics and Technology: Ethical Issues in an Age of Information and Communication Technology. 2nd edition. (2007) John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
78. Tavani, H.T. (2004b). Genomic research and data mining technology: implications for personal privacy and informed consent. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(1), 15-28.
79. Tavani, H.T. (2007b). Philosophical theories of privacy: implications for an adequate online privacy policy. Metaphilosophy, 38(1), 1-22.
80. Tavani, H.T. (2007c). Floridi's ontological theory of informational privacy: some implications and challenges. In: Hinman L. et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry (CEPE 2007). Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, Enschede, The Netherlands, pp. 385-396. Reprinted in Ethics and Information Technology, 10, in press.
81. Tavani, H.T. and Moor, J.H. (2001). Privacy protection, control of information, and privacy-enhancing technologies. Computers and Society, 31(1), 6-11.
82. Thomson, J.J. (1975). The right to privacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4(4), 295-315.
83. Van den Hoven, J. (2004). Privacy and the varieties of informational wrongdoing. In: Spinello, R.A. and Tavani, H. (Eds.), Readings in Cyber Ethics, 2nd edition. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, pp. 488-500.
84. Van den Hoven, J. (2005). Privacy. In: Mitcham, C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, MacMillan, New York, pp. 1490-1492.
85. Vedder, A.H. (2004). KDD, privacy, individuality, and fairness. In: Spinello, R.A. and Tavani, H.T. (Eds.), Readings in Cyber Ethics, 2nd edition. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, pp. 462-470.
86. Volkman, R. (2003). Privacy as life, liberty, property. Ethics and Information Technology, 5(4), 199-210.
87. Wang, H.M., Lee, K.O., and Wang C. (1998). Consumer privacy concerns about internet marketing. Communications of the ACM, 41(3), 63-70.
88. Warren, S. and Brandeis, L. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 14(5), 193-220.
89. Westin, A.F. (1967). Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum Press, New York
90. Whalen v. Roe (1977). 429 U.S. 589.
91. Zimmer, M. (2005). Surveillance, privacy and the ethics of vehicle safety communications. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 201-210.