What parents find important when participating in longitudinal studies: Results from a questionnaire

Clinical Ethics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 28-34

  Helgesson, Gert ^a   Hansson, M G ^b   Ludvigsson, Johnny ^c   Swartling, Ulrica ^c  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992853993     PISSN: 14777509     EISSN: 1758101X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ce.2009.009039     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rich SS, Concannon P. Challenges and strategies for investigating the genetic complexity of common human diseases. Diabetes 2002; 51: 288–94.
2. Mead VP. A new model for understanding the role of environmental factors in the origins of chronic illness: a case study of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Med Hypothesis 2004; 63: 1035–46.
3. Scofield RH. Autoantibodies as predictors of disease. Lancet 2004; 363: 1544–6.
4. Roberts MJ, Reich MR. Ethical analysis in public health. Lancet 2002; 359: 1055–9.
5. Shalala D. Protecting research subjects – what must be done. New Engl J Med 2000; 343: 808.
6. Eriksson S, Helgesson G. Potential harms, anonymization, and the right to withdraw consent to biobank research. Eur J Hum Genet 2005; 13: 1071–6.
7. Kuczewski MG, Marshall P. The decision dynamics of clinical research: the context and process of informed consent. Med Care 2002; 40 (Suppl.): 45–54.
8. Kelch R. Maintaining the public trust in clinical research. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 285–7.
9. Haimes E, Whong-Barr M. Key issues in genetic epidemiology: lessons from a UK based empirical study. Trames 2004; 8: 150–63.
10. Knox CA, Burkhart PV. Issues related to children participating in clinical research. J Pediatr Nurs 2007; 22: 310–8.
11. Williamson E, Goodenough T, Kent J, Ashcroft R. Children's participation in genetic epidemiology. In: Tutton R, Corrigan O, eds. Genetic Databases: Socio-ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. London: Routledge, 2004: 139–60.
12. Rodriguez A, Tuvemo T, Hansson MG. Parents' perspectives on research involving children. Ups J Med Sci 2006; 111: 73–86.
13. Helgesson G. Children, longitudinal studies, and informed consent. Med Health Care Philos 2005; 8: 307–13.
14. Gustafsson Stolt U, Helgesson G, Liss P-E, Ludvigsson J, Svensson T. Information and informed consent in a longitudinal screening involving children: a questionnaire survey. Eur J Hum Genet 2005; 13: 376–83.
15. Gustafsson Stolt U, Liss P-E, Ludvigsson J. Nurses' views of longitudinal screening and research involving children: a bioethical case study. Br J Nurs 2005; 14: 71–7.
16. Helgesson G, Ludvigsson J, Gustafsson Stolt U. How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study. J Med Ethics 2005; 11: 670–3.
17. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 1932; 140: 1–55.
18. Helgesson G, Hansson MG, Ludvigsson J, Swartling U. Practical matters, rather than lack of trust, motivate non-participation in a long-term cohort trial. Pediatr Diabetes 2009; 10: 408–12.
19. Hoehn KS, Wernovsky G, Rychik J, et al. What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F267–9.
20. Maayan-Metzger A, Kedem-Friedrich P, Kuint J. Motivations of mothers to enroll their newborn infants in general clinical research on well-infant care and development. Pediatrics 2008; 121: e590–6.
21. Goodenough T, Williamson E, Kent J, Ashcroft R. ‘What did you think about that?’ Researching children's perceptions of participation in a longitudinal genetic epidemiological study. Children Soc 2003; 17: 113–25.
22. Alderson P. Young Children's Rights. Exploring Beliefs, Principles and Practice. London, Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2000.
23. The Swedish Act concerning the Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans (2003:460).
24. Caulfield T. Biobanks and blanket consent: the proper place of the public good and public perception rationales. King's Law J 2007; 18: 209–26.