Collegial Study Groups: A Strategy for Creating Shared Visions of Assistive Technology Outcomes

Assessment for Effective Intervention

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 327-347

  Edyburn, Dave L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992803640     PISSN: 15345084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073724770002500406     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. AbleData. (2000). Search for assistive technology products. Available from: http//www.abledata.com/text2/search.htm.
2. Blackhurst, A.E. (1997). Perspectives on technology in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(5), 41–48.
3. Bruder, I. (1993, October). Technology in the U.S.A. Electronic Learning, 20–28.
4. Caverly, D.C., Peterson, C.L., & Mandeville, T.F. (1997). A generational model for professional development. Educational Leadership, 55(3), 56–59.
5. CEO Forum. (1998). 1998 Star Chart: A tool for assessing school technology and readiness. Washington, DC: Author. [also available from: http://www.ceoforum.org]
6. Cook, A.M., & Hussey,S.M. (1995). Assistive technologies: Principles and practice. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, Inc.
7. Derer, K., Polsgrove, L., & Rieth, H. (1996). A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(2), 62–80.
8. Edyburn, D.L. (2000). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(9), 1–24.
9. Edyburn, D.L., & Gardner, J.E. (1999). Integrating technology into special education teacher education programs: Creating shared visions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(2), 3–20.
10. Edyburn, D.L., & Gardner, J.E. (2000). The use of technology to enhance professional productivity. In J. Lindsey (Ed.). Technology and exceptional individuals (3rd ed., pp. 161–189). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
11. Golden, D. (1998). Assistive technology in special education: Policy and practice. Reston, VA: The CASE/TAM Assistive Technology Policy and Practice Group.
12. Haines, L., & Sanche, B. (2000). Assessment models and software support for assistive technology teams, Diagnostique, 25(3), 291–306.
13. Herner, L.M., & Higgins, K. (2000). Forming and benefiting from educator study groups. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(5), 30–37.
14. Hutinger, P., Johanson, J., & Stoneburner, R. (1996). Assistive technology applications in educational programs of children with multiple disabilities: A case study report on the state of the practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(1), 16–35.
15. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C., § 1400 et seq. (1997).
16. Liberman, A., & Miller, L. (1990). Restructuring schools: What matters and what works. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(10), 759–764.
17. Luftman, J.N. (1996). Competing in the information age: Strategic alignment in practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. McGillivray, K. (1999). The toolkit: An innovative approach to technology integration in networked schools. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(5), 18–21, 31.
19. McGregor, G., & Pachuski, P. (1996). Assistive technology in schools: Are teachers, ready, able, and supported? Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(1), 4–15.
20. Moore, G.A. (1991). Crossing the chasm. New York: HarperBusiness.
21. Murphy, C. (1992). Study groups foster school-wide learning. Educational Leadership, 50(3), 71–74.
22. Murphy, C.U., & Lick, D.W. (2001). Whole-faculty study groups (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
23. Parette, H.P., & Hourcade, J.J. (1997). Family issues and assistive technology needs: A sample of state practices. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(3), 27–43.
24. Parette, H.P., & Hourcade, J.J. (2000). Assistive technology training for parents of students with disabilities. Special Education Technology Practice, 2(2), 20–24.
25. Raskind, M.H., Higgins, E.L., Slaff, N.B., & Shaw, T.K. (1998). Assistive technology in the homes of children with learning disabilities: An exploratory study. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 47–56.
26. Sanacore, J. (1993). Using study groups to create a professional community. Journal of Reading, 37(1), 62–66.
27. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
28. Todis, B. (1996). Tools for the task? Perspectives on assistive technology in educational settings. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(2), 49–61.
29. Todis, B., & Walker, H.M. (1993). User perspectives on assistive technology in educational settings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 26(3), 1–16.
30. U.S. Department of Education. (1996) Professional development. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
31. U.S. Department of Education. (1998). An educator's guide to evaluating the use of technology in schools and classrooms. Available from: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/EdTechGuide/
32. Wehmeyer, M.L. (1999). Assistive technology and students with mental retardation: Utilization and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(1), 48–58.
33. World Health Organization. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva: Author.
34. Zabala, J.S., & Korsten, J.E. (1999). Beyond “try it! you'll like it… or maybe you won't?”: Making a measurable difference with assistive technology. Preconference workshop handout. 1999 Closing the Gap Conference, Minneapolis, MN.