Effective Feedback Procedures in Games for Health

Games for Health Journal

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 320-326

  Baranowski, Tom ^a   Bower, Kelly ^b   Krebs, Paul ^c   Lamoth, Claudine J ^d   Lyons, Elizabeth J ^e  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992761621     PISSN: 2161783X     EISSN: 21617856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/g4h.2013.1328     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. SPRINT. (Smart Prevention, Rehabilitation & INtervention Technologies at home for improved mobility). Groningen, The Netherlands: University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen. http://www.imdi-sprint.nl/exergaming-project/?lang=en (accessed December 7, 2013).
2. Zijlstra A, Mancini M, Chiari L, et al. Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: A systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010; 7:58.
3. Sihvonen SE, Sipila S, Era PA. Changes in postural balance in frail elderly women during a 4-week visual feedback training: A randomized controlled trial. Gerontology 2004; 50:87-95.
4. Betker AL, Szturm T, Moussavi ZK, et al. Video game-based exercises for balance rehabilitation: A single-subject design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87:1141-1149.
5. Bisson E, Contant B, Sveistrup H, et al. Functional balance and dual-task reaction times in older adults are improved by virtual reality and biofeedback training. Cyberpsychol Behav 2007; 10:16-23.
6. Fitzgerald D, Trakarnratanakul N, Smyth B, et al. Effects of a wobble board-based therapeutic exergaming system for balance training on dynamic postural stability and intrinsic motivation levels. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40:11-19.
7. Lamoth CJ, Alingh R, Caljouw SR. Exergaming for elderly: Effects of different types of game feedback on performance of a balance task. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 181:103-107.
8. Lamoth CJ, Caljouw SR, Postema K. Active video gaming to improve balance in the elderly. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011; 167:159-164.
9. Wulf G, McNevin N, Shea CH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Q J Exp Psychol A 2001; 54:1143-1154.
10. Wulf G, Prinz W. Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychon Bull Rev 2001; 8:648-660.
11. Masters R, Maxwell J. The theory of reinvestment. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol 2008; 1:160-183.
12. van Vliet PM, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28:831-840.
13. Stanton R, Ada L, Dean CM, et al. Biofeedback improves activities of the lower limb after stroke: A systematic review. J Physiother 2011; 57:145-155.
14. Saposnik G, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: A meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke 2011; 42:1380-1386.
15. Bower K, Clark R, McGinley J, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of the Nintendo Wii gaming system to improve balance performance post-stroke: Protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. Games Health J 2013; 2:103-108.
16. Lange B, Flynn S, Proffitt R, et al. Development of an interactive game-based rehabilitation tool for dynamic balance training. Top Stroke Rehabil 2010; 17:345-352.
17. Lange B, Koenig S, Chang CY, et al. Designing informed game-based rehabilitation tasks leveraging advances in virtual reality. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34:1863-1870.
18. Lyons EJ, Hatkevich C. Prevalence of behavior changing strategies in fitness video games: Theory-based content analysis. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15:e81.
19. Ijsselsteijn W, Nap HH, de Kort Y, et al. Digital game design for elderly users. In: Conference on Future Play, Toronto, Ontario. New York: ACM; 2007: 17-22.
20. Burke JW, McNeill MDJ, Charles DK, et al. Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. Vis Comput 2009; 25:1085-1099.
21. Rand D, Katz N, Weiss PL. Intervention using the VMall for improving motor and functional ability of the upper extremity in post stroke participants. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2009; 45:113-121.
22. Rovniak LS, Hovell MF, Wojcik JR, et al. Enhancing theoretical fidelity: An e-mail-based walking program demonstration. Am J Health Promot 2005; 20:85-95.
23. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.
24. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 2000; 25:54-67.
25. Przybylski AK, Rigby CS, Ryan RM. A motivational model of video game engagement. Rev Gen Psychol 2010; 14:154-166.
26. Antin J, Churchill EF. Badges in social media: A social psychological perspective. In: ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. http://gamification-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/03-Antin-Churchill.pdf.
27. Laschke M, Hassenzahl M. Mayor or patron? The difference between a badge and a meaningful story. In: ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. http://gamification-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/18-Laschke.pdf.
28. Yee N, Bailenson JN, Ducheneaut N. The Proteus effect implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Commun Res 2009; 36:285-312.
29. Jin SA. Avatars mirroring the actual self versus projecting the ideal self: The effects of self-priming on interactivity and immersion in an exergame, Wii Fit. Cyberpsychol Behav 2009; 12:761-765.
30. Baylor AL. Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: Role of visual presence and appearance. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009; 364:3559-3565.
31. Fox J, Bailenson JN. Virtual self-modeling: The effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychol 2009; 12:1-25.
32. van Dijk D, Kresin F, Reitenbach M, et al., eds. Users as Designers: A Hands-On Approach to Creative Research. Amsterdam: Waag Society; 2011.
33. Van DiestM. Exergaming for balance training in elderly: User requirements. Conference paper presented at Games4Health Europe, Amsterdam, 2012.
34. Flores E, Tobon G, Cavallaro E, et al. Improving patient motivation in game development for motor deficit rehabilitation. In: International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. New York: ACM; 2008: 381-384.
35. Rigby S. From first date to a committed relationship: Designing for engagement and sustained satisfaction. 2009. www.immersyve.com/research-updates/2009/1/15/gdc-09- immersyve-presentation-on-sustaining-player-engagemen .html (accessed October 31, 2013).
36. Lauwaert M, Wachelder J, van de Walle J. Frustrating desire on repens and repositio, or the attractions and distractions of digital games. Theor Cult Soc 2007; 24:89-108.
37. Deterding S. Paideia as paidia: From game-based learning to a life well-played. Keynote Address at Games Learning Society 80, Madison, WI, June 15, 2012.
38. Dickey MD. Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design. Educ Technol Res Dev 2005; 53:67-83.
39. Howland G. Balancing game play hooks. In: Laramee FD, ed. Game Design Perspectives. Hingham, MA: Charles River Media; 2002: 78-84.
40. Van Diest M, Lamoth CJ, Stegenga J, et al. Exergaming for balance training of elderly: State of the art and future developments. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013; 10:101.
41. Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol 2013; 6:77-104.
42. Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol 2010; 29:1-8.
43. Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol 2008; 27:379-387.