Optimal CO2 allocation and scheduling in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations

Applied Energy

Volumn 184, Issue , 2016, Pages 337-345

  Tapia, John Frederick D ^a   Lee, Jui Yuan ^b   Ooi, Raymond E H ^c   Foo, Dominic C Y ^c   Tan, Raymond R ^a  

^a DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY   (Philippines)

^b NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM MALAYSIA CAMPUS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; CO2 allocation; Enhanced oil recovery; Mathematical programming; Mixed integer linear programming; Scheduling

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; ECONOMICS; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; OIL WELL FLOODING; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR ENGINEERING; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS; SCHEDULING;

ALLOCATION AND SCHEDULING; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES (CCS); EMISSIONS INTO THE ATMOSPHERE; ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY; GEOLOGICAL SEQUESTRATION; MIXED INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MIXED INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING MODEL; RESERVOIR DEPLETION;

ENHANCED RECOVERY;

BIOMASS ALLOCATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY; LINEAR PROGRAMING; MASS BALANCE; OIL PRODUCTION; OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; RESERVOIR;

EID: 84992494627     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.093     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. [1] International Energy Agency (IEA). World energy investment outlook. Paris: IEA; 2015.
2. [2] Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). World oil outlook. Vienna: OPEC; 2015.
3. [3] Marchal, V., Dellink, R., OECD environmental outlook to 2050: climate change chapter. 2011, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Publishing.
4. [4] Hong, S., Bradshaw, C.J.A., Brook, B.W., Global zero-carbon energy pathways using viable mixes of nuclear and renewables. Appl Energy 143 (2015), 451–459.
5. [5] Gibbins, J., Chalmers, H., Carbon capture and storage. Energy Pol 36 (2008), 4317–4322.
6. [6] International Energy Agency (IEA). Technology roadmap: carbon capture and storage. Paris: OECD/IEA; 2009.
7. [7] Davison, J., Freund, P., Smith, A., Putting carbon back into the ground. 2001, IEA Greenh Gas R&D Program.
8. [8] Røkke, N.A., Langørgen, Ø., Enabling pre-combustion plants – the DECARBit project. Energy Proc 1 (2009), 1435–1442.
9. [9] Wall, T., Liu, Y., Spero, C., Elliott, L., Khare, S., Rathnam, R., et al. An overview on oxyfuel coal combustion—state of the art research and technology development. Chem Eng Res Des 87 (2009), 1003–1016.
10. [10] Shahrestani, M.M., Rahimi, A., Evolution, fields of research, and future of chemical-looping combustion (CLC) process: a review. Environ Eng Res 19 (2014), 299–308.
11. 2 storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers. Int J Greenh Gas Control 40 (2015), 188–202.
12. [12] Benson, S., Cook, P., Underground geological storage. Intergovernmental panel on climate change special report on carbon capture and storage, 2005, Cambridge University Press.
13. 2 storage capacity estimation: methodology and gaps. Int J Greenh Gas Control 1 (2007), 430–443.
14. [14] Viebahn, P., Vallentin, D., Höller, S., Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in India's power sector – an integrated assessment. Appl Energy 117 (2014), 62–75.
15. [15] Viebahn, P., Vallentin, D., Höller, S., Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in China'spower sector – an integrated assessment. Appl Energy 157 (2015), 229–244.
16. [16] Yu H, Wei Y-M, Tang B-J, Mi Z, Pan S-Y. Assessment on the research trend of low-carbon energy technology investment: a bibliometric analysis. Appl Energy [in press]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.129.
17. [17] Yan, J., Carbon capture and storage (CCS). Appl Energy 148 (2015), A1–A6.
18. [18] National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery: untapped domestic energy supply and long term carbon storage solution. United States: Department of Energy; 2010.
19. 2 storage in depleted oil fields: the worldwide potential for carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery. Energy Proc 4 (2011), 2162–2169.
20. [20] Lanktree, G., Nothing ventured, nothing recovered: SaskPower's Boundary Dam project a test case for carbon capture and storage. CIM Mag 9 (2014), 55–57.
21. [21] Li, Q., Wei, Y.-N., Chen, Z.-A., Water-CCUS nexus: challenges and opportunities of China's coal chemical industry. Clean Technol Environ Pol 18 (2015), 775–786.
22. [22] Mikkelsen, M., Jørgensen, M., Krebs, F.C., Schrader, B., Balat, H., Öz, C., et al. The teraton challenge. A review of fixation and transformation of carbon dioxide. Energy Environ Sci 3 (2010), 43–81.
23. 2-EOR): factors involved in adding carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) to enhanced oil recovery. 2012, Melzer Consulting, Midland, Texas.
24. [24] Tan, R.R., Ng, D.K.S., Foo, D.C.Y., Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained planning for sustainable power generation. J Clean Prod 17:10 (2009), 940–944.
25. [25] Ooi, R.E.H., Foo, D.C.Y., Ng, D.K.S., Tan, R.R., Planning of carbon capture and storage with pinch analysis techniques. Chem Eng Res Des 91 (2013), 2721–2731.
26. [26] Ooi, R.E.H., Foo, D.C.Y., Tan, R.R., Targeting for carbon sequestration retrofit planning in the power generation sector for multi-period problems. Appl Energy 113 (2014), 477–487.
27. [27] Diamante, J.A.R., Tan, R.R., Foo, D.C.Y., Ng, D.K.S., Aviso, K.B., Bandyopadhyay, S., Unified pinch approach for targeting of carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems with multiple time periods and regions. J Clean Prod 71 (2014), 67–74.
28. [28] Diamante, J.A.R., Tan, R.R., Foo, D.C.Y., Ng, D.K.S., Aviso, K.B., Bandyopadhyay, S., A graphical approach for pinch-based source-sink matching and sensitivity analysis in carbon capture and storage systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 52 (2013), 7211–7222.
29. 2 transport: a new application of the assignment problem. Energy 12 (1987), 123–130.
30. [30] Middleton, R.S., Bielicki, J.M., A scalable infrastructure model for carbon capture and storage: SimCCS. Energy Pol 37 (2009), 1052–1060.
31. 2 capture and storage optimization problem. Comput Environ Urban Syst 36 (2012), 18–29.
32. 2 transport pipeline network. Appl Energy 132 (2014), 610–620.
33. 2 emissions mitigation in the Canadian oil sands industry. 9th Int conf greenh gas control technol n.d. p. 2721–31.
34. [34] Elkamel, A., Hashim, H., Douglas, P.L., Croiset, E., Optimization of energy usage for fleet-wide power generating system under carbon mitigation options. AIChE J 55 (2009), 3168–3190.
35. [35] Nakata, T., Silva, D., Rodionov, M., Application of energy system models for designing a low-carbon society. Prog Energy Combust Sci 37 (2011), 462–502.
36. [36] Tan, R.R., Aviso, K.B., Bandyopadhyay, S., Ng, D.K.S., Continuous-time optimization model for source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 51 (2012), 10015–10020.
37. [37] Tan, R.R., Aviso, K.B., Bandyopadhyay, S., Ng, D.K.S., Optimal source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems with time, injection rate, and capacity constraints. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 32 (2013), 411–416.
38. [38] Tapia, J.F.D., Tan, R.R., Fuzzy optimization of multi-period carbon capture and storage systems with parametric uncertainties. Process Saf Environ Prot, 2014, 1–10.
39. [39] He, Y.-J., Zhang, Y., Ma, Z.-F., Sahinidis, N.V., Tan, R.R., Foo, D.C.Y., Optimal source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems under uncertainty. Ind Eng Chem Res 53 (2014), 778–785.
40. [40] Tapia, J.F.D., Tan, R.R., Optimal revamp of multi-region carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems by two-step linear optimization. Energy Syst 6 (2015), 269–289.
41. [41] Lee, J.-Y., Tan, R.R., Chen, C.-L., A unified model for the deployment of carbon capture and storage. Appl Energy 121 (2014), 140–148.
42. [42] Safarzadeh, M.A., Motahhari, S.M., Co-optimization of carbon dioxide storage and enhanced oil recovery in oil reservoirs using a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). Pet Sci 11 (2014), 460–468.
43. 2-EOR and storage. Greenh Gases Sci Technol 4 (2014), 66–80.
44. [44] Leach, A., Mason, C.F., van‘t Veld, K., Co-optimization of enhanced oil recovery and carbon sequestration. Resour Energy Econ 33 (2011), 893–912.
45. [45] Jahangiri, H.R., Zhang, D., Ensemble based co-optimization of carbon dioxide sequestration and enhanced oil recovery. Int J Greenh Gas Control 8 (2012), 22–33.
46. [46] Jahangiri, H.R., Zhang, D., Optimization of carbon dioxide sequestration and Enhanced Oil Recovery in oil reservoir. 2010, Society of Petroleum Engineers, California, 902–910.
47. 2 utilization for enhanced oil recovery from depleted reservoirs. Chem Eng Sci 144 (2016), 30–38.
48. 2 capture, utilization, and sequestration supply chain network optimization. Ind Eng Chem Res 53 (2014), 7489–7506.
49. 2 capture coupled with enhanced oil recovery. Int J Energy Res 37 (2013), 1794–1810.
50. 2 injection. Appl Energy 113 (2014), 1475–1483.
51. 2 capture, utilization, and sequestration: CCUS and CCU. Comput Chem Eng 81 (2015), 2–21.
52. [52] Sun, L., Chen, W., The improved ChinaCCS decision support system: a case study for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region of China. Appl Energy 112 (2013), 793–799.
53. [53] Sun, L., Chen, W., Development and application of a multi-stage CCUS source–sink matching model. Appl Energy, 2016, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.009.
54. 2 for EOR applications. Energy Proc 63 (2014), 7836–7843.
55. [55] McCollom DL, Ogden JM. Techno-economic models for carbon dioxide compression, transport, and storage & correlations for estimating carbon dioxide density and viscosity. Report UCD—ITS—RR—06-14, Institute of Transportation Studies, Davis, California.
56. [56] Eccles, J.K., Pratson, L., A “carbonshed” assessment of small- vs. large-scale CCS deployment in the continental US. Appl Energy 113 (2014), 352–361.
57. [57] Chen, Z.A., Li, Q., Liu, L.C., Zhang, X., Kuang, L., Jia, L., et al. A large national survey of public perceptions of CCS technology in China. Appl Energy 158 (2015), 366–377.