Optimal source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems with time, injection rate, and capacity constraints

Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 411-416

  Tan, Raymond R ^a   Aviso, Kathleen B ^a   Bandyopadhyay, Santanu ^b   Ng, Denny K S ^c  

^a DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY   (Philippines)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM MALAYSIA CAMPUS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; mixed integer linear programming; source sink matching

Indexed keywords

CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; GASEOUS COMBUSTION; MIXED INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MIXED INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING MODEL; PURE CARBON DIOXIDE; SOURCE-SINK; VARIABLE FLOW RATE;

CARBON CAPTURE; WATER INJECTION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84876291934     PISSN: 19447442     EISSN: 19447450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ep.11630     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Davison, J., Freund, P., &, Smith, A., (2001). Putting carbon back into the ground, Cheltenham: International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.
2. Pires, J.C.M., Martins, F.G., Alvim-Ferraz, M.C.M., &, Simões, M., (2011). Recent developments on carbon capture and storage: An overview. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 89, 1446-1460.
3. 2 capture with chemical absorption: A state-of-the-art review. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 89, 1609-1624.
4. Falcke, T. J., Hoadley, A. F. A., Brennan, D. J., &, Sinclair, S. E., (2011). The sustainability of clean coal technology: IGCC with/without CCS. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 89, 41-52.
5. Wall, T., Liu, Y., Spero, C., Elliott, L., Khare, S., Rathnam, R., Zeenathal, F., Moghtaderi, B., Buhre, B., Sheng, C., Gupta, R., Yamada, T., Makino, K., &, Yu, J., (2011). An overview on oxyfuel coal combustion-State of the art research and technology development. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 87, 1003-1016.
6. Adanez, J., Abad, A., Garcia-Labiano, F., Gayar, P., &, de Diego, L.F., (2012). Progress in chemical looping combustion and reforming technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 38, 215-282.
7. Tan, R.R., Ng, D.K.S., &, Foo, D.C.Y., (2009). Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained planning for sustainable power generation. Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 940-944.
8. Tan, R.R., Ng, D.K.S., Foo, D.C.Y., &, Aviso, K.B., (2010). Crisp and fuzzy integer programming models for optimal carbon sequestration retrofit in the power sector. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 88, 1580-1588.
9. Pekala, L.M., Tan, R.R., Foo, D.C.Y., &, Jezowski, J., (2010) Optimal energy planning models with carbon footprint constraints. Applied Energy 87, 1903-1910.
10. 2 transport infrastructure: Optimization of pipeline network, effect of ownership, and political incentives. Energy Procedia 4, 3024-3031.
11. Vangkilde-Pedersen, T., (2009). EU GeoCapacity-Assessing European Capacity for Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide. Final Report, Project No. SES6-518318 (Available at: ec.europa.eu/clima/events/0028/geocapacity-en. pdf, retrieved November 17, 2011).
12. 2 source-sink matching in the lower 48 United States, with examples from the Texas Gulf Coast and Permian Basin. Environmental Geology 57, 1537-1551.
13. Condor, J., Unatrakarn, D., Asghari, K., &, Wilson, M., (2011). Current status of CCS initiatives in the major emerging economies. Energy Procedia 4, 6125-6134.
14. 2 transport: A new application of the assignment problem. Energy 12, 123-130.
15. th International Conference on Greeenhouse Gas Control Technologies (October 1-4, 2002, Kyoto, Japan) pp. 627-632.
16. Kazmierczak, T., Brandsma, R., Neele, F., &, Hendriks, C., (2009). Algorithm to create a CCS low-cost pipeline network. Energy Procedia 1, 1617-1623.
17. Middleton, R.S., &, Bielicki, J.M., (2009). A comprehensive carbon capture and storage infrastructure model. Energy Procedia 1, 1611-1636.
18. Middleton, R.S., &, Bielicki, J.M., (2009). A scalable infrastructure model for carbon capture and storage: SimCCS. Energy Policy 37, 1052-1060.
19. Fimbres Weihs, G.A., Wiley, D.E., &, Ho, M., (2011). Steady-state optimisation of CCS pipeline networks for cases with multiple emission sources and injection sites: South-east Queensland case study. Energy Procedia 4, 2748-2755.
20. Lindo Systems, Inc. (2010). Lingo: The modelling language and optimizer. Chicago, IL: Lindo Systems, Inc.
21. Bard, J.F., (1998). Practical bilevel optimization. algorithms and applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.