A novel function of the cell polarity-regulating kinase PAR-1/MARK in dendritic spines

BioArchitecture

Volumn 1, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 261-266

  Hayashi, Kenji ^a   Suzuki, Atsushi ^a   Ohno, Shigeo ^a  

^a YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dendritic spine; Microtubule associated proteins; Microtubule dynamics; Microtubule plus end tracking proteins; Partition defective 1 microtubule affinity regulating kinase; Partitioning defective protein atypical protein kinase C system

Indexed keywords

MARK PROTEIN; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; PROTEINASE ACTIVATED RECEPTOR 1; REGULATOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MATURATION; CELL POLARITY; CELL STRUCTURE; DENDRITE; DENDRITIC SPINE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; HIPPOCAMPUS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MICROTUBULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN METABOLISM; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TISSUE STRUCTURE;

EID: 84992284680     PISSN: 19490992     EISSN: 1949100X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/bioa.1.6.19199     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Zhou Q, Homma KJ, Poo MM. Shrinkage of dendritic spines associated with long-term depression of hippocampal synapses. Neuron 2004; 44:749-57; PMID: 15572107; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.011
2. Matsuzaki M, Honkura N, Ellis-Davies GC, Kasai H. Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature 2004; 429:761-6; PMID: 15190253; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02617
3. Yang Y, Wang XB, Frerking M, Zhou Q. Spine expansion and stabilization associated with long-term potentiation. J Neurosci 2008; 28:5740-51; PMID: 18509035; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3998-07.2008
4. Harvey CD, Svoboda K. Locally dynamic synaptic learning rules in pyramidal neuron dendrites. Nature 2007; 450:1195-200; PMID:18097401; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06416
5. Kopec CD, Li B, Wei W, Boehm J, Malinow R. Glutamate receptor exocytosis and spine enlargement during chemically induced long-term potentiation. J Neurosci 2006; 26:2000-9; PMID:16481433; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3918-05.2006
6. Tada T, Sheng M. Molecular mechanisms of dendritic spine morphogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2006; 16: 95-101; PMID:16361095; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.12.001
7. Lendvai B, Stern EA, Chen B, Svoboda K. Experiencedependent plasticity of dendritic spines in the developing rat barrel cortex in vivo. Nature 2000; 404: 876-81; PMID:10786794; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35009107
8. Holtmaat A, Wilbrecht L, Knott GW, Welker E, Svoboda K. Experience-dependent and cell-typespecific spine growth in the neocortex. Nature 2006; 441:979-83; PMID:16791195; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04783
9. Takumi Y, Ramírez-León V, Laake P, Rinvik E, Ottersen OP. Different modes of expression of AMPA and NMDA receptors in hippocampal synapses. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2:618-24; PMID:10409387; http://dx. doi.org/10.1038/10172
10. Nusser Z, Lujan R, Laube G, Roberts JD, Molnar E, Somogyi P. Cell type and pathway dependence of synaptic AMPA receptor number and variability in the hippocampus. Neuron 1998; 21:545-59; PMID: 9768841; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00) 80565-6
11. Kharazia VN, Weinberg RJ. Immunogold localization of AMPA and NMDA receptors in somatic sensory cortex of albino rat. J Comp Neurol 1999; 412:292-302; PMID:10441757; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990920)412:2,292::AID-CNE8. 3.0.CO;2-G
12. Holtmaat A, Svoboda K. Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10:647-58; PMID:19693029; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2699
13. Saneyoshi T, Fortin DA, Soderling TR. Regulation of spine and synapse formation by activity-dependent intracellular signaling pathways. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2010; 20:108-15; PMID:19896363; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.013
14. Cingolani LA, Goda Y. Actin in action: the interplay between the actin cytoskeleton and synaptic efficacy. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9:344-56; PMID:18425089; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2373
15. Murakoshi H, Wang H, Yasuda R. Local, persistent activation of Rho GTPases during plasticity of single dendritic spines. Nature 2011; 472:100-4; PMID: 21423166; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09823
16. Kaech S, Parmar H, Roelandse M, Bornmann C, Matus A. Cytoskeletal microdifferentiation: a mechanism for organizing morphological plasticity in dendrites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:7086-92; PMID:11416192; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 111146798
17. Westrum LE, Jones DH, Gray EG, Barron J. Microtubules, dendritic spines and spine appratuses. Cell Tissue Res 1980; 208:171-81; PMID:6996822; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00234868
18. Morales M, Fifkova E. Distribution of MAP2 in dendritic spines and its colocalization with actin. An immunogold electron-microscope study. Cell Tissue Res 1989; 256:447-56; PMID:2743390
19. Hu X, Viesselmann C, Nam S, Merriam E, Dent EW. Activity-dependent dynamic microtubule invasion of dendritic spines. J Neurosci 2008; 28:13094-105; PMID:19052200; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3074-08.2008
20. Gu J, Firestein BL, Zheng JQ. Microtubules in dendritic spine development. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 12120-4; PMID:19005076; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2509-08.2008
21. Jaworski J, Kapitein LC, Gouveia SM, Dortland BR, Wulf PS, Grigoriev I, et al. Dynamic microtubules regulate dendritic spine morphology and synaptic plasticity. Neuron 2009; 61:85-100; PMID:19146815; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.013
22. Suzuki A, Ohno S. The PAR-aPKC system: lessons in polarity. J Cell Sci 2006; 119:979-87; PMID: 16525119; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02898
23. St Johnston D, Ahringer J. Cell polarity in eggs and epithelia: parallels and diversity. Cell 2010; 141:757-74; PMID:20510924; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell. 2010.05.011
24. Matenia D, Mandelkow EM. The tau of MARK: a polarized view of the cytoskeleton. Trends Biochem Sci 2009; 34:332-42; PMID:19559622; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2009.03.008
25. Shulman JM, Benton R, St Johnston D. The Drosophila homolog of C. elegans PAR-1 organizes the oocyte cytoskeleton and directs oskar mRNA localization to the posterior pole. Cell 2000; 101:377-88; PMID:10830165; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80848-X
26. Huynh JR, Shulman JM, Benton R, St Johnston D. PAR-1 is required for the maintenance of oocyte fate in Drosophila. Development 2001; 128:1201-9; PMID:11245586
27. Doerflinger H, Benton R, Shulman JM, St Johnston D. The role of PAR-1 in regulating the polarised microtubule cytoskeleton in the Drosophila follicular epithelium. Development 2003; 130:3965-75; PMID: 12874119; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.00616
28. Cohen D, Brennwald PJ, Rodriguez-Boulan E, Müsch A. Mammalian PAR-1 determines epithelial lumen polarity by organizing the microtubule cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol 2004; 164:717-27; PMID:14981097; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200308104
29. Chen YM, Wang QJ, Hu HS, Yu PC, Zhu J, Drewes G, et al. Microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 2 functions downstream of the PAR-3/PAR-6/atypical PKC complex in regulating hippocampal neuronal polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:8534-9; PMID:16717194; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0509955103
30. Sapir T, Sapoznik S, Levy T, Finkelshtein D, Shmueli A, Timm T, et al. Accurate balance of the polarity kinase MARK2/Par-1 is required for proper cortical neuronal migration. J Neurosci 2008; 28:5710-20; PMID: 18509032; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 0911-08.2008
31. Drewes G, Ebneth A, Mandelkow EM. MAPs, MARKs and microtubule dynamics. Trends Biochem Sci 1998; 23:307-11; PMID:9757832; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01245-6
32. Panda D, Daijo JE, Jordan MA, Wilson L. Kinetic stabilization of microtubule dynamics at steady state in vitro by substoichiometric concentrations of tubulincolchicine complex. Biochemistry 1995; 34:9921-9; PMID:7632691; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00031a014
33. Dhamodharan R, Wadsworth P. Modulation of microtubule dynamic instability in vivo by brain microtubule associated proteins. J Cell Sci 1995; 108:1679-89; PMID:7615685
34. Bunker JM, Wilson L, Jordan MA, Feinstein SC. Modulation of microtubule dynamics by tau in living cells: implications for development and neurodegeneration. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:2720-8; PMID: 15020716; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-01-0062
35. Hayashi K, Suzuki A, Hirai S, Kurihara Y, Hoogenraad CC, Ohno S. Maintenance of dendritic spine morphology by partitioning-defective 1b through regulation of microtubule growth. J Neurosci 2011; 31:12094-103; PMID:21865452; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0751-11.2011
36. Terabayashi T, Itoh TJ, Yamaguchi H, Yoshimura Y, Funato Y, Ohno S, et al. Polarity-regulating kinase partitioning-defective 1/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 2 negatively regulates development of dendrites on hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 2007; 27:13098-107; PMID:18045904; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3986-07.2007
37. Uboha NV, Flajolet M, Nairn AC, Picciotto MR. A calcium- and calmodulin-dependent kinase Ialpha/ microtubule affinity regulating kinase 2 signaling cascade mediates calcium-dependent neurite outgrowth. J Neurosci 2007; 27:4413-23; PMID:17442826; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0725-07.2007
38. Sapir T, Shmueli A, Levy T, Timm T, Elbaum M, Mandelkow EM, et al. Antagonistic effects of doublecortin and MARK2/Par-1 in the developing cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 2008; 28:13008-13; PMID: 19036994; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2363-08.2008
39. Zhang W, Benson DL. Stages of synapse development defined by dependence on F-actin. J Neurosci 2001; 21:5169-81; PMID:11438592
40. Schratt GM, Tuebing F, Nigh EA, Kane CG, Sabatini ME, Kiebler M, et al. A brain-specific microRNA regulates dendritic spine development. Nature 2006; 439:283-9; PMID:16421561; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04367
41. Segu L, Pascaud A, Costet P, Darmon M, Buhot MC. Impairment of spatial learning and memory in ELKL Motif Kinase1 (EMK1/MARK2) knockout mice. Neurobiol Aging 2008; 29:231-40; PMID:17196307; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.10.014
42. Thies E, Mandelkow EM. Missorting of tau in neurons causes degeneration of synapses that can be rescued by the kinase MARK2/Par-1. J Neurosci 2007; 27:2896-907; PMID:17360912; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4674-06.2007
43. Quinlan EM, Halpain S. Emergence of activitydependent, bidirectional control of microtubuleassociated protein MAP2 phosphorylation during postnatal development. J Neurosci 1996; 16:7627-37; PMID:8922419
44. Quinlan EM, Halpain S. Postsynaptic mechanisms for bidirectional control of MAP2 phosphorylation by glutamate receptors. Neuron 1996; 16:357-68; PMID: 8789950; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80053-7
45. Kapitein LC, Yau KW, Gouveia SM, van der Zwan WA, Wulf PS, Keijzer N, et al. NMDA receptor activation suppresses microtubule growth and spine entry. J Neurosci 2011; 31:8194-209; PMID:21632941; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6215-10.2011
46. Halpain S, Greengard P. Activation of NMDA receptors induces rapid dephosphorylation of the cytoskeletal protein MAP2. Neuron 1990; 5:237-46; PMID: 2169265; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(90)90161-8
47. Kameyama K, Lee HK, Bear MF, Huganir RL. Involvement of a postsynaptic protein kinase A substrate in the expression of homosynaptic long-term depression. Neuron 1998; 21:1163-75; PMID: 9856471; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80633-9
48. Zhang H, Macara IG. The polarity protein PAR-3 and TIAM1 cooperate in dendritic spine morphogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:227-37; PMID:16474385; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1368
49. Zhang H, Macara IG. The PAR-6 polarity protein regulates dendritic spine morphogenesis through p190 RhoGAP and the Rho GTPase. Dev Cell 2008; 14:216-26; PMID:18267090; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.11.020
50. Suzuki A, Ishiyama C, Hashiba K, Shimizu M, Ebnet K, Ohno S. aPKC kinase activity is required for the asymmetric differentiation of the premature junctional complex during epithelial cell polarization. J Cell Sci 2002; 115:3565-73; PMID:12186943; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00032
51. Chen X, Macara IG. Par-3 controls tight junction assembly through the Rac exchange factor Tiam1. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7:262-9; PMID:15723052; http://dx. doi.org/10.1038/ncb1226
52. Suzuki A, Hirata M, Kamimura K, Maniwa R, Yamanaka T, Mizuno K, et al. aPKC acts upstream of PAR-1b in both the establishment and maintenance of mammalian epithelial polarity. Curr Biol 2004; 14:1425-35; PMID:15324659; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.021
53. Motegi F, Sugimoto A. Sequential functioning of the ECT-2 RhoGEF, RHO-1 and CDC-42 establishes cell polarity in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:978-85; PMID:16921365; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1459
54. Kishikawa M, Suzuki A, Ohno S. aPKC enables development of zonula adherens by antagonizing centripetal contraction of the circumferential actomyosin cables. J Cell Sci 2008; 121:2481-92; PMID: 18628308; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.024109
55. Gundersen GG. Evolutionary conservation of microtubule-capture mechanisms. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3:296-304; PMID:11994749; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm777
56. Nakajima H, Tanoue T. Lulu2 regulates the circumferential actomyosin tensile system in epithelial cells through p114RhoGEF. J Cell Biol 2011; 195:245-61; PMID:22006950; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201104118
57. Ishiuchi T, Takeichi M. Willin and Par3 cooperatively regulate epithelial apical constriction through aPKCmediated ROCK phosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:860-6; PMID:21685893; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2274
58. Yoshihara Y, De Roo M, Muller D. Dendritic spine formation and stabilization. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2009; 19:146-53; PMID:19523814; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.05.013