Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 41, Issue , 2016, Pages 425-452

  Seto, Karen C ^a   Davis, Steven J ^b   Mitchell, Ronald B ^c   Stokes, Eleanor C ^a   Unruh, Gregory ^d   Ürge Vorsatz, Diana ^e  

^a Yale School of the Environment   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^d GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Climate change; Energy; Fossil fuels; Path dependency; Positive feedback loops

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; FOSSIL FUELS; PUBLIC POLICY;

CARBON EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS; DANGEROUS CLIMATE CHANGES; ENERGY; PATH DEPENDENCY; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; POSITIVE FEEDBACK LOOP; SOCIAL CONSTRAINTS; TECHNICAL SYSTEMS;

LOCKS (FASTENERS);

EID: 84992176793     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934     Document Type: Article

References (137)

1. Raupach MR,Davis SJ, PetersGP, Andrew RM, Canadell JG, et al 2014. Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 4(10):873-79
2. Rogelj J, Luderer G, Pietzcker RC, Kriegler E, Schaeffer M, et al 2015. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C. Nat. Clim. Change 5(6):519-27
3. Smil V. 2010. Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger
4. Unruh GC, Carrillo-Hermosilla J. 2006. Globalizing carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 34(10):1185-97
5. Foxon TJ. 2003. Inducing Innovation for a Low Carbon Future: Drivers, Barriers and Policies. London: Carbon Trust
6. Int. Energy Agency. 2014. Key World Energy Statistics 2014. Paris: Int. Energy Agency
7. Int. Panel Clim. Chang. 2013. Climate Change 2013-The Physical Science Basis. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
8. Unruh GC. 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28:817-30
9. Unruh GC. 2002. Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 30:317-25
10. Modi V, McDade S, Lallement D, Saghir J. 2005. Energy Services for the Millennium Development Goals. Washington, DC: World Bank and U.N. Dev. Program
11. Seto KC, Dhakal S, Blanco H, Delgado GC, Dewar D, et al 2014. Human settlements, infrastructure, and spatial planning. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change; Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. O Edenhofer, R Pichs-Madruga, Y Sokona, S Kadner, K Seyboth, et al, chap
12. Williamson OE. 1981. The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. Am. J. Sociol. 87(3):548
13. Ha-Duong M, Grubb MJ, Hourcade J-C. 1997. Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement. Nature 390(6657):270-73
14. Kolstad CD. 1996. Fundamental irreversibilities in stock externalities. J. Public Econ. 60(2):221-33
15. Calvin K, Patel P, Fawcett A, Clarke L, Fisher-Vanden K, et al 2009. The distribution and magnitude of emissions mitigation costs in climate stabilization under less than perfect international cooperation: SGM results. Energy Econ. 31(Suppl. 2):S187-97
16. Jaccard M, Rivers N. 2007. Heterogeneous capital stocks and the optimal timing for CO2 abatement. Resour. Energy Econ. 29(1):1-16
17. Shalizi Z, Lecocq F. 2009. Climate change and the economics of targeted mitigation in sectors with long-lived capital stock. Policy Res. Work. Pap. 5063, World Bank, Nancy, France
18. Davis SJ, Caldeira K, Matthews HD. 2010. Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Science 329(5997):1330-33
19. Davis SJ, Socolow RH. 2014. Commitment accounting of CO2 emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 9(8):84018
20. Dixit A. 1992. Investment and hysteresis. J. Econ. Perspect: 1986-1998. 6(1):107-32
21. Kramer GJ, Haigh M. 2009. No quick switch to low-carbon energy. Nature 462(7273):568-69
22. Bertram C, Johnson N, Luderer G, Riahi K, Isaac M, Eom J. 2015. Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90(Part A):62-72
23. Caldecott B, McDaniels J. 2014. Stranded generation assets: implications for European capacity mechanisms, energy markets and climate policy. Stranded Assets Program. Work. Pap., Smith Sch. Enterpr. Environ., Univ. Oxford, Oxford, UK
24. Johnson N, Krey V, McCollum DL, Rao S, Riahi K, Rogelj J. 2015. Stranded on a low-carbon planet: implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90(Part A):89-102
25. Rozenberg J, Davis SJ, Narloch U, Hallegatte S. 2015. Climate constraints on the carbon intensity of economic growth. Environ. Res. Lett. 10:095006
26. Shearer C, Ghio N, Myllyvirta L, Nace T. 2015. Boom and Bust: Tracking The Global Coal Plant Pipeline. San Francisco/Oakland, CA: CoalSwarm/Sierra Club
27. Sierra Club. 2012. Locked-In: The Financial Risks of New Coal-Fired Power Plants in Today's Volatile International Coal Market. Oakland, CA: Sierra Club
28. Erickson P, Kartha S, Michael L, Tempest K. 2015. Assessing carbon lock-in. Environ. Res. Lett. 10:1-7
29. Plumer B. 2015. Solar power still needs to get much cheaper. Are perovskites the answer? Vox. http://www. vox.com/2015/7/1/8877305/perovskite-solar-power
30. Power Past Coal, Earthjustice, Sierra Club. 2012. Permitting coal export terminals in the pacific northwest: An overview of regulations and the political context. San Francisco/Oakland, CA: Earthjustice/Sierra Club
31. McGlade C, Ekins P. 2015. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature 517(7533):187-90
32. Clark VR, Herzog HJ. 2014. Can "stranded" fossil fuel reserves drive CCS deployment? Energy Procedia 63:7261-71
33. Matthews HD. 2014. A growing commitment to future CO2 emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 9(11):111001
34. World Resources Institute. 2015. Draft recommendations on "Calculating and reporting the potential ghg emissions from fossil fuel reserves." Rep., World Res. Inst., Washington, DC. http://www.wri.org/sites/ default/files/potential-emissions-draft-methodology.pdf
35. Erickson P, Lazarus M. 2015. Global emissions: New oil investments boost carbon lock-in. Nature. 526(7571):43-43
36. Peters GP, Andrew RM, Solomon S, Friedlingstein P. 2015. Measuring a fair and ambitious climate agreement using cumulative emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 10(10):105004
37. Banister D, Watson S, Wood C. 1997. Sustainable cities: transport, energy, and urban form. Environ. Plan. B 24(1):125-43
38. Makido Y, Dhakal S, Yamagata Y. 2012. Relationship between urban form and CO2 emissions: evidence from fifty Japanese cities. Urban Clim. 2:55-67
39. Guivarch C, Hallegatte S. 2011. Existing infrastructure and the 2°C target. Clim. Change 109(3-4):801-5
40. LuconO,Ürge-VorsatzD, Zain Ahmed A, AkbariH, Bertoldi P, et al 2014. Buildings. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change; Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. O Edenhofer, R Pichs-Madruga, Y Sokona, S Kadner, K Seyboth, et al, chap
41. Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla KK. 2010. Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: an overview. Energy Build. 42(10):1592-1600
42. Sartori I, Hestnes AG. 2007. Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: a review article. Energy Build. 39(3):249-57
43. Fernandez JE. 2004. Designing diverse lifetimes for evolving buildings. In Environmental Diversity in Architecture, eds. K Steemers, MA Steane, pp. 65-83. Taylor &Francis
44. NorthDC. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge,UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
45. Mahoney J, Thelen K. 2010. A theory of gradual institutional change. In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, ed. J Mahoney, K Thelen, pp. 1-38. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
46. Ebbinghaus B. 2005. Can path dependence explain institutional change? Two approaches applied to welfare state reform. MPIfG Disc. Pap. 05/2, Max Planck Inst. Study Soc., Cologne, Germ
47. Hosli MO, Dörfler T. 2015. The United Nations Security Council: the challenge of reform. In Rising Powers and Multilateral Institutions, ed. D Lesage, T van de Graaf, pp. 135-52. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
48. Pierson P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94(2):251-67
49. Jacobsson S, Lauber V. 2006. The politics and policy of energy system transformation: explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34:256-76
50. Klitkou A, Bolwig S, Hansen T, Wessberg N. 2015. The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: the case of energy for road transport. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 16:22-37
51. Olson M. 1965. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
52. Könnölä T, Unruh GC, Carrillo-Hermosilla J. 2006. Prospective voluntary agreements for escaping techno-institutional lock-in. Ecol. Econ. 57:239-52
53. Foxon TJ. 2012. Managing the transition towards sustainable regimes: a co-evolutionary approach. In Creating a Sustainable Economy: An Institutional and Evolutionary Approach to Environmental Policy, ed. G Marletto, pp. 115-31. New York: Routledge
54. Cowan R. 1990. Nuclear power reactors: a study in technological lock-in. J. Econ. Hist. 50(3):541-67
55. Thelen K. 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2:369-404
56. Kingdon JW. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman. 2nd ed
57. Notteboom T, De Langen P, Jacobs W. 2013. Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines. J. Transp. Geogr. 27:26-35
58. Strambach S. 2010. Path dependence and path plasticity: The co-evolution of institutions and innovation\-The German customized business software industry. In Handbook for Evolutionary Economic Geography, ed. RA Boschma, R Martin, pp. 406-31. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
59. Barnes W, Gartland M, Stack M. 2004. Old habits die hard: path dependency and behavioral lock-in. J. Econ. Issues 38(2):371-77
60. Cook E. 1982. The role of history in the acceptance of nuclear power. Soc. Sci. Q. 63(1):3-15
61. Carrington D. 2015. Renewable energy outstrips coal for first time in UK electricity mix. The Guardian, Sep. 24
62. Neslen A. 2015. Wind power generates 140% of Denmark's electricity demand. The Guardian, Jul. 10
63. Stenzel T, Frenzel A. 2008. Regulating technological change: the strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish andUK electricitymarkets. Energy Policy 36(7):2645-57
64. Hardin G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243-48
65. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
66. Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D. 2010. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45(1):133-55
67. Kammen DM. 2006. The rise of renewable energy. Sci. Am. 295(3):84-93
68. Margolis RM, KammenDM. 1999. Underinvestment: the energy technology and R&Dpolicy challenge. Science 285(5428):690-92
69. Lund PD. 2009. Effects of energy policies on industry expansion in renewable energy. Renew. Energy 34(1):53-64
70. Frankfurt Sch.UNEP Cent./BNEF. 2016. Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2016. Frankfurt, Germ.: Frankfurt Sch. UNEP Cent./BNEF
71. Woerdman E. 2004. The Institutional Economics of Market-Based Climate Policy. Amsterdam: Elsevier
72. John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown &Co
73. Berkhout F. 2002. Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Glob. Environ. Change 12:1-4
74. Esty DC. 1994. Greening the GATT: Trade, Environment, and the Future. Washington, DC: Int. Inst. Econ.
75. Hicks RL, Parks BC, Roberts JT, Tierney MJ. 2008. Greening Aid? Understanding the Environmental Impact of Development Assistance. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
76. Wade R. 1997. Greening the World Bank: the struggle over the environment, 1970-1985. In TheWorld Bank: Its First Half-Century, ed. D Kapur, JP Lewis, R Webb, pp. 611-734. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press
77. Lauber V, Jacobsson S. 2015. The politics and economics of constructing, contesting, and restricting socio-political space for renewables: the German renewable energy act. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 34:256-76
78. Schimschar S, Blok K, Boermans T, Hermelink A. 2011. Germany's path towards nearly zeroenergy buildings-enabling the greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the building stock. Energy Policy 39(6):3346-60
79. Weiss J,Dunkelberg E, Vogelpohl T. 2012. Improving policy instruments to better tap into homeowner refurbishment potential: lessons learned from a case study in Germany. Energy Policy 44:406-15
80. Inglehart RM. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
81. Inglehart RM. 1995. Public support for environmental protection: the impact of objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. Polit. Sci. Polit. 27(1):57-71
82. Steinberg PF. 2015. Who Rules the Earth? How Social Rules Shape Our Planet and Our Lives. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
83. Haas PM. 1992. Banning chlorofluorocarbons. Int. Organ. 46(1):187-224
84. Garcia-Johnson R. 2000. Exporting Environmentalism: U.S. Multinational Chemical Corporations in Brazil and Mexico. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
85. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
86. Miller D. 1998. Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
87. Nickles S. 2002. "Preserving women": refrigerator design as social process in the 1930s. Technol. Cult. 43(4):693-727
88. Jaffe AB, Stavins RN. 1994. The energy-efficiency gap:What does it mean? Energy Policy 22(10):804-10
89. Marechal K, Lazaric N. 2010. Overcoming inertia: insights from evolutionary economics into improved energy and climate policies. Clim. Policy 10(1):103-19
90. O'Rourke D, Lollo N. 2015. Transforming consumption: from decoupling, to behavior change, to system changes for sustainable consumption. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40:233-59
91. Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process 50:179-211
92. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. 1977. Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 84(5):888-918
93. Kl öckner CA, Bl öbaum A. 2010. A comprehensive action determination model: toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choice. J. Environ. Psychol. 30(4):574-86
94. Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J. 2010. How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40(6):998-1009
95. Neal DT,Wood W, Labrecque JS, Lally P. 2012. How do habits guide behavior? Perceived and actual triggers of habits in daily life. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48(2):492-98
96. de Vries P, Aarts H, Midden CJH. 2011. Changing simple energy-related consumer behaviors: how the enactment of intentions is thwarted by acting and non-acting habits. Environ. Behav. 43(5):612-33
97. Ouellette JA, Wood W. 1998. Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychol. Bull. 124(1):54
98. Page N, Page M. 2014. Climate change: time to do something different. Front. Psychol. 5:1-15
99. Girod B, van Vuuren DP, deVries B. 2013. Influence of travel behavior on globalCO2 emissions. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 50:183-97
100. Aarts H, Verplanken B, Van Knippenberg A. 1997. Habit and information use in travel mode choices. Acta Psychol. 96(1-2):1-14
101. Gardner B. 2009. Modelling motivation and habit in stable travel mode contexts. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 12(1):68-76
102. Danner UN, Aarts H, de Vries NK. 2008. Habit versus intention in the prediction of future behaviour: the role of frequency, context stability and mental accessibility of past behaviour. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 47(Part 2):245-65
103. Brette O, Buhler T, Lazaric N, Mar K, Brette O, et al 2014. Reconsidering the nature and effects of habits in urban transportation behavior.Work. Pap. 2014-10, Groupe Rech. Droit Econ. Gest., Cent. Natl. Rech. Sci., Nice, Fr
104. Donald IJ, Cooper SR, Conchie SM. 2014. An extended theory of planned behaviour model of the psychological factors affecting commuters' transport mode use. J. Environ. Psychol. 40:39-48
105. Graham-Rowe E, Skippon S, Gardner B, Abraham C. 2011. Can we reduce car use and, if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 45(5):401-18
106. Kurz T, Gardner B, Verplanken B, Abraham C. 2015. Habitual behaviors or patterns of practice? Explaining and changing repetitive climate-relevant actions. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 6(1):113-28
107. Verplanken B. 2010. Engaging the Public with Climate Change. New York: Routledge
108. Verplanken B,Walker I, Davis A, Jurasek M. 2008. Context change and travel mode choice: combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses. J. Environ. Psychol. 28(2):121-27
109. Bamberg S. 2006. Is a residential relocation a good opportunity to change people's travel behavior? Results from a theory-driven intervention study. Environ. Behav. 38(6):820-40
110. Maréchal K. 2010. Not irrational but habitual: the importance of "behavioural lock-in" in energy consumption. Ecol. Econ. 69(5):1104-14
111. Fujii S. 2003. What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change. Transportation 30(1):81-95
112. Thøgersen J, Møller B. 2008. Breaking car use habits: the effectiveness of a free one-month travelcard. Transportation 35(3):329-45
113. LeeTM, Markowitz EM, Howe PD, Ko C-Y, Leiserowitz AA. 2015. Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nat. Clim. Change 5(11):1014-20
114. Swim JCS, Doherty T, Gifford R, Howard G, Reser J, et al 2009. Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing aMulti-Faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges; a Report by theAmerican Psychological Association Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change.Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc
115. Gifford R. 2011. The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am. Psychol. 66(4):290-302
116. Chorus CG. 2014. Risk aversion, regret aversion and travel choice inertia: an experimental study. Transp. Plan. Technol. 37(4):321-32
117. Chorus CG,Dellaert B. 2012. Travel choice inertia: the joint role of risk aversion and learning. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 46(1):139-55
118. Gazheli A, Antal M, van den Bergh J. 2015. The behavioral basis of policies fostering long-run transitions: stakeholders, limited rationality and social context. Futures 69:14-30
119. Selinger E,Whyte K. 2011. Is there a right way to nudge? The practice and ethics of choice architecture. Sociol. Compass 5(10):923-35
120. Shove E. 2010. Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ. Plan. A 42(6):1273-85
121. Shove E, Pantzar M. 2005. Consumers, producers and practices: understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. J. Consum. Cult. 5(1):43-64
122. Geels FW, Schot J. 2010. The dynamics of transitions: a socio-technical perspective. In Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, ed. J Grin, J Rotmans, J Schot, part I. London: Routledge
123. Elzen B, Wieczorek A. 2005. Transitions towards sustainability through system innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 72(6):651-61
124. Shove E, Pantzar M, Watson M. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: Sage
125. Norgaard KM. 2011. Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
126. Burch S. 2010. Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Glob. Environ. Change 20(2):287-97
127. Sahakian M, Wilhite H. 2013. Making practice theory practicable: towards more sustainable forms of consumption. J. Consum. Cult. 14(1):25-44
128. Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, GoldsteinNJ, Griskevicius V. 2007. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 18(5):429-34
129. Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ. 2004. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55(1):591-621
130. Shove E, Walker G. 2014. What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand. Theory Cult. Soc. 31(5):41-58
131. Watson M. 2013. Building future systems of velomobility. Sustainable Practices: Social Theory and Climate Change, ed. E Shove, N Spurling, pp. 117-31. Oxford, UK: Routledge
132. Shove E, Walker G, Brown S. 2014. Material culture, room temperature and the social organisation of thermal energy. J. Mater. Cult. 19(2):113-24
133. Jackson T. 2005. Motivating sustainable consumption. Sustain. Dev. Res. Netw. 29:30
134. Evans D, McMeekin A, Southerton D. 2012. Sustainable consumption, behaviour change policies and theories of practice. The Habits of Consumption, ed. AWarde, D Southerton, pp. 113-29. Helsinki: Hels. Coll. Adv. Stud
135. Burch S. 2011. Sustainable development paths: investigating the roots of local policy responses to climate change. Sustain. Dev. 19(3):176-88
136. Spaargaren G. 2011. Theories of practices: agency, technology, and culture. Glob. Environ. Change 21(3):813-22
137. Watson M. 2012. How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system. J. Transp. Geogr. 24:488-96