The distribution and magnitude of emissions mitigation costs in climate stabilization under less than perfect international cooperation: SGM results

Energy Economics

Volumn 31, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2009, Pages

  Calvin, Katherine ^a   Patel, Pralit ^a   Fawcett, Allen ^b   Clarke, Leon ^a   Fisher Vanden, Karen ^c   Edmonds, Jae ^a   Kim, Son H ^a   Sands, Ron ^d   Wise, Marshall ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b US Environmental Protection Agency's Climate Change Division   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

CGE models; Climate change; Emissions mitigation; Leakage

Indexed keywords

CARBON PRICE; CGE MODEL; CGE MODELS; CLIMATE STABILIZATION; DISCOUNTED COSTS; EMISSIONS MITIGATION; LEAKAGE RATES; LOW LEVEL; RADIATIVE FORCINGS; TRANSITION SCENARIOS;

COSTS; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MARKUP LANGUAGES;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; INCENTIVE; INDUSTRIAL EMISSION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MITIGATION; RADIATIVE FORCING;

EID: 70749148583     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ang B.W., and Zhang F.W. A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 25 (2000) 1149-1176
2. Babiker M.H. Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. Journal of International Economics 65 (2005) 421-445
3. Berk M.M., and den Elzen M.G.J. Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realize timely participation to meet stringent climate goals?. Climate Policy 1 4 (2001) 465-480
4. Bollen J., Manders T., and Timmer H. Decomposing carbon leakage-an analysis of the Kyoto protocol. Third Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Melbourne, Australia (2000)
5. Burniaux J.-M., and Oliveira Martins J. Carbon emission leakage: a general equilibrium view. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 242 (2000), Paris
6. 2 Equivalent in the 21st Century, Submitted to Energy Economics.
7. Clarke L., Edmonds J., Jacoby H., Pitcher H., Reilly J., and Richels R. CCSP synthesis and assessment product 2.1, part a: scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations (2007), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC
8. Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Krey, V., Richels, R., Rose, S., Tavoni, M., 2009. International Climate Policy Architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios. Energy Economics. Forthcoming.
9. den Elzen M.G.J., and Meinshausen M. Meeting the EU 2 °C Climate Target: Global and Regional Emission Implications, RIVM report 728001031 (2005), Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven. http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/728001031.pdf http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/728001031.pdf
10. den Elzen M.G.J., Lucas P., and van Vuuren D. Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes. Energy Policy 33 16 (2005) 2138-2151
11. In: Dimaranan BetinaV. (Ed). Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 6 Data Base (2006), Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University
12. 2 concentrations with incomplete international cooperation. Climate Policy 8 (2008) 355-376 PNNL-SA-16932
13. EIA. Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2008 (1997), Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. ftp://ftp.eia.doe.gov/pub/forecasting/aeo97/aeo97asu.pdf Accessed at ftp://ftp.eia.doe.gov/pub/forecasting/aeo97/aeo97asu.pdf
14. EIA. Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2008 (2008), Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/ DOE/EIA-0554(2008). Accessed at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/
15. 2 reductions and carbon leakage: the consequences of international trade in oil and basic materials. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 (1993) 162-176
16. Hotelling H. The economics of exhaustible resources. Journal of Political Economy 39 (1931) 137-175
17. IEA. Energy balances of non-OECD countries, 1971-2005 (2007), International Energy Agency, Paris, France
18. IEA. Energy balances of OECD countries, 1960-2005 (2007), International Energy Agency, Paris, France
19. Keppo I., and Rao S. International climate regimes: Effects of delayed participation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 74, Issue 7, Greenhouse Gases - Integrated Assessment, 0040-1625 (2007) 962-979 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.025
20. 2 stabilization: long-term limits and paths, mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change. Climate Change and Environmental Policy 10 (2005) 213-220 PNNL-SA-38439
21. Kuik O., and Gerlagh R. Trade liberalization and carbon leakage. The Energy Journal 24 3 (2003) 97-119
22. Mas-Colell A., Whinston M., and Green J. Microeconomic theory (1995), Oxford University Press, Inc., New York
23. Paltsev S.V. The Kyoto protocol: regional and sectoral contributions to the carbon leakage. The Energy Journal 22 4 (2001) 53-79
24. Peck S.C., and Wan Y.H. Analytic solutions of simple greenhouse gas emission models. In: Van Ierland E.C., and Gorka K. (Eds). Chapter 6 in Economics of Atmospheric Pollution (1996), Springer Verlag, New York
25. Reinaud J. Climate Policy and Carbon Leakage-Impacts of the European Emissions Trading Scheme on Aluminium (2008), OECD/International Energy Agency October
26. Richels R., Rutherford T., Blanford G., and Clarke L. Managing the transition to climate stabilization. Climate Policy 7 5 (2008) 409-428
27. Rimmer M.T., and Powell A.A. An implicitly, directly additive demand system. Applied Economics 28 (1996) 1613-1622
28. 2 abatement measures. Netherlands Research Programme on Climate Change, Report 500036-002 (2004)
29. United Nations. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change (1997), United Nations, New York
30. 2 concentrations: technical, political, and economic dimensions. Energy Policy 27 10 (1999) 613-622
31. Varian H. Microeconomic analysis (1984), W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York