The EU Water Framework Directive: From great expectations to problems with implementation

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 575, Issue , 2017, Pages 358-366

  Voulvoulis, Nikolaos ^a   Arpon, Karl Dominic ^a   Giakoumis, Theodoros ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Catchment management; Ecological status; Policy; Programme of Measures; Systems thinking

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; PUBLIC POLICY; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ASSESSMENT; CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGICAL STATUS; PROGRAMME OF MEASURES; SYSTEMS THINKING;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

SURFACE WATER;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EUROPEAN UNION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; SUSTAINABILITY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER USE;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FAUNA; LAW; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIVER BASIN; WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

EUROPE;

EID: 84992166535     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.228     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Arnold, R.D., Wade, J.P., A definition of systems thinking: a systems approach. Procedia Comput. Sci. 44 (2015), 669–678.
2. Baaner, L., Programmes of measures under the water framework directive - a comparative case study. Nord. Environ. Law J. 1 (2011), 31–52.
3. Baaner, L., Josefsson, H., The water framework directive: a directive for the twenty-first century?. J. Environ. Law 23:3 (2011), 463–486.
4. Bald, J., Borja, A., Muxika, I., Franco, J., Valencia, V., Assessing reference conditions and physico-chemical status according to the European water framework directive: a case-study from the Basque Country (northern Spain). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50 (2005), 1508–1522.
5. Behagel, J.H., The politics of democratic governance: the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands. PhD Thesis, 2012, Wageningen University.
6. Behagel, J.H., Arts, B., Democratic governance and political rationalities in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands. Public Adm. 92:2 (2014), 291–306.
7. Borja, A., Rodriguez, J.G., Problems associated with the “one-out, all-out” principle, when using multiple ecosystem components in assessing the ecological status of marine waters. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 60:8 (2010), 1143–1146.
8. Borja, A., Franco, J., Pérez, V., A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 40:12 (2000), 1100–1114.
9. Borja, A., Franco, J., Valencia, V., Bald, J., Muxika, I., Belzunce, M.J., Solaun, O., Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive from the Basque Country (northern Spain): a methodological approach. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 48 (2004), 209–218.
10. Boscheck, R., The EU Water Framework Directive: meeting the global call for regulatory guidance?. Interecon. Rev. Eur. Econ. Policy 41:5 (2006), 268–271.
11. Bouleau, G., Pont, D., Did you say reference conditions? Ecological and socio-economic perspectives on the European Water Framework Directive. Environ. Sci. Pol. 47 (2015), 32–41.
12. Carter, J.G., Spatial planning, water and the Water Framework Directive: insights from theory and practice. Geogr. J. 173:4 (2007), 330–342.
13. Collins, K., Blackmore, C., Morris, D., Watson, D., A systemic approach to managing multiple perspectives and stakeholding in water catchments: some findings from three UK case studies. Environ. Sci. Pol. 10:6 (2007), 564–574.
14. Collins, A., Ohandja, D.G., Hoare, D., Voulvoulis, N., Implementing the Water Framework Directive: a transition from established monitoring networks in England and Wales. Environ. Sci. Pol. 17 (2012), 49–61.
15. Donauhanse, The EU Water Framework Directive Factsheet. 2013 (Available at: http://icp.donauhanse.net/activities/donauhanse-factsheets.html Accessed 03 June 2016).
16. Dufour, S., Piégay, H., From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Res. Appl. 25:5 (2009), 568–581.
17. Environment Agency, Update to the river basin management plans in England. National Evidence and Data Report, 2015 (Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/river-basin-management-plans-national-evidence-and-data-report Accessed 15 September 2016).
18. Environment Agency, Anglian RBMP: Part 2: River Basin Management Planning Overview and Additional Information. 2016 (Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/part-2-river-basin-management-planning-overview-and-additional-information Accessed 01 May 2016).
19. European Commission, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off. J. Eur. Communities, 2000, 2000.
20. European Communities, Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document No. 7, Monitoring under the Water Framework Directive, 2003.
21. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, European Overview (1/2) Accompanying the Document: “Report From the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) River Basin Management Plans”. COM (2012) 670 Final. 2012.
22. European Commission, Environment: Commission Asks Italy to Transpose Water Legislation Correctly. 2012 (Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-292_en.htm?locale=en Accessed: 26 September 2016).
23. European Commission, Environment: Commission Asks Poland to Correctly Transpose Legislation Concerning Water Monitoring. 2012 (Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-172_en.htm?locale=en Accessed: 26 September 2016).
24. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, “the Fitness Check of EU Freshwater Policy”, SWD(2012) 393 Final. 2012.
25. European Commission, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) River Basin Management Plans. COM(2012) 670 Final. 2012.
26. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, European Overview (2/2) Accompanying the document “Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) River Basin Management Plans”. COM (2012) 670 Final. 2012.
27. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, Report on the progress in implementation of the Water Framework Directive Programmes of Measures. Accompanying the document: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. The Water Framework Directive and the Floods Directive: Actions towards the ‘good status’ of EU water and to reduce flood risks. COM (2015) 120 Final. 2015.
28. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. The Water Framework Directive and the Floods Directive: Actions Towards the ‘Good Status’ of EU Water and to Reduce Flood Risks. COM (2015) 120 Final. 2015 (Available at: http://europeanmemoranda.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/files/2015/04/7152-15_(1).pdf Accessed 03 June 2016).
29. European Commission, Assessment of Member States’ progress in the implementation of Programme of Measures during the first planning cycle of the Water Framework Directive. Member State Report: Sweden, 2015.
30. European Commission, Assessment of Member States’ progress in the implementation of Programme of Measures during the first planning cycle of the Water Framework Directive. Member States’ Report: Austria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Germany, Finland, France, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, Slovak Republic, United Kingdom, 2015.
31. European Commission, Introduction to the New EU Water Framework Directive. 2016 (Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/info/intro_en.htm Accessed 01 May 2016).
32. European Communities, Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document No. 3, Analysis of Pressures and Impacts, 2003.
33. European Communities, Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document No. 5, Transitional and Coastal Waters Typology, Reference Conditions and Classification Systems, 2003.
34. European Communities, Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document No. 13, Overall Approach to the Classification of Ecological Status and Ecological Potential, 2005.
35. European Communities, Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Report of the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 18.3 of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC on Programmes for Monitoring of Water Status. COM(2009)156. 2009.
36. European Environmental Bureau, An Assesment of Actions Taken by the EU to Implement the Water Framework Directive (WFD) Do They Make the WFD Work?. 2003 (Available at: http://www.wrrl-info.de/docs/EEB_PositionpaperWFDjune03.pdf Accessed 12 June 2016).
37. Everard, M., Why does “good ecological status” matter?. Water Environ. J. 26 (2012), 165–174.
38. Ferreira, J.G., Wolff, W.J., Simas, T.C., Bricker, S.B., Does biodiversity of estuarine phytoplankton depend on hydrology?. Ecol. Model. 187:4 (2005), 513–523.
39. Fryirs, K., Brierley, G.J., Naturalness and place in river rehabilitation. Ecol. Soc., 14(1), 2009.
40. Glasbergen, P., Driessen, P.P.J., The paradigm shift in environmental politics. Towards a new image of the manageable society. Driessen, P.P.J., Glasbergen, P., (eds.) Greening Society the Paradigm Shift in Dutch Environmental Politics, 2002, Kuwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 3–25.
41. Grimeaud, D., The EC Water Framework Directive, an introductory guide. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 13(1), 2004, 1–35.
42. Hering, D., Borja, A., Carstensen, J., Carvalho, L., Elliott, M., Feld, C.K., Heiskanen, A.-S., Johnson, R.K., Moe, J., Pont, D., Solheim, A.L., van de Bund, W., The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Sci. Total Environ. 408:19 (2010), 4007–4019.
43. Hilderbrand, R.H., Watts, A.C., Randle, A.M., The myths of restoration ecology. Ecol. Soc., 10(1), 2005.
44. Hjorth, P., Bagheri, A., Navigating towards sustainable development: a system dynamics approach. Futures 38 (2006), 74–92.
45. Holling, C.S., Meffe, G.K., Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv. Biol. 10:2 (1996), 328–337.
46. Hooper, B.P., Integrated water resources management and river basin governance. Water Resources Update, 126, 2003, 12–20.
47. Howarth, W., The progression towards ecological quality standards. J. Environ. Law 18:1 (2006), 3–35.
48. Howarth, W., Aspirations and realities under the Water Framework Directive: proceduralisation, participation and practicalities. J. Environ. Law 21:3 (2009), 391–417.
49. Hughes, F.M.R., Colston, A., Mountford, J.O., Restoring riparian ecosystems: the challenge of accommodating variability and designing restoration trajectories. Ecol. Soc., 10(1), 2005.
50. Hughes, S.J., Cabral, J.A., Bastos, R., Cortes, R., Vicente, J., Eitelberg, D., Yu, H., Honrado, J., Santos, M., A stochastic dynamic model to assess land use change scenarios on the ecological status of fluvial water bodies under the Water Framework Directive. Sci. Total Environ. 565 (2016), 427–439.
51. Ioris, A.A.R., Water institutional reforms in Scotland: contested objectives and hidden disputes. Water Alternatives, 1(2), 2008, 253–270.
52. Jager, N.W., Challies, E., Kochskämper, E., Newig, J., Benson, D., Blackstock, K., Collins, K., Ernst, A., Evers, M., Feichtinger, J., Fritsch, O., Gooch, G., Grund, W., Hedelin, B., Hernández-Mora, N., Hüesker, F., Huitema, D., Irvine, K., Klinke, A., Lange, L., Loupsans, D., Lubell, M., Maganda, C., Matczak, P., Parés, M., Saarikoski, H., Slavíková, L., Sonja van der Arend, S., von Korff, Y., Transforming European water governance? Participation and river basin management under the EU Water Framework Directive in 13 member states. Water, 8(156), 2016.
53. Jeppesen, E., Søndergaard, M., Jensen, J.P., Havens, K., Anneville, O., Carvalho, L., Covenet, M.F., Deneke, R., Dokulil, M.T., Foy, B., Gerdeaux, D., Hampton, S.E., Hilt, S., Kangur, K., Kohler, J., Lammens, E.H.H.R., Lauridsen, T.L., Manca, M., Miracle, M.R., Moss, B., Noges, P., Persson, G., Philips, G., Portielje, R., Romo, S., Schelske, C.L., Straile, D., Tatrai, I., Willen, E., Winder, M., Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading—an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies. Freshw. Biol. 50 (2005), 1747–1771.
54. Johnson, C., Toward post-sovereign environmental governance? Politics, scale, and EU water framework directive. Water Altern. 5:1 (2012), 83–97.
55. Johnson, D., Benn, A., Ferreira, A., United Nations Environment Programme: Review of Ecosystem-Based Indicators and Indices on the State of the Regional Seas. 2013.
56. Jones, H.P., Schmitz, O.J., Rapid recovery of damaged ecosystems. PLoS One 4:5 (2009), 1–6.
57. Josefsson, H., Achieving ecological objectives. Laws 1:1 (2012), 39–63.
58. Josefsson, H., Good ecological status: advancing the ecology of law. Doctoral Thesis, 2015, Uppsala University.
59. Kaika, M., The Water Framework Directive: a new directive for a changing social, political and economic European framework. Eur. Plan. Stud. 11:3 (2003), 299–316.
60. Kaika, M., Water for Europe: the creation of the European Water Framework Directive. Trottier, J., Slack, P., (eds.) Managing Water Resources Past and Present, 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 88–116.
61. Kaika, M., Page, B., The EU water framework directive: part 1. European policy-making and the changing topography of lobbying. Eur. Environ. 13:6 (2003), 314–327.
62. Kail, J., Wolter, C., Analysis and evaluation of large-scale river restoration planning in Germany to better link river research and management. River Res. Appl. 27:8 (2011), 985–989.
63. Kelly, M., Data rich, information poor? Phytobenthos assessment and the Water Framework Directive. Eur. J. Phycol. 48:4 (2013), 437–450.
64. Liefferink, D., Wiering, M., Uitenboogaart, Y., The EU Water Framework Directive: a multi-dimensional analysis of implementation and domestic impact. Land Use Policy 28:4 (2011), 712–722.
65. Margerum, R.D., Integrated watershed management: comparing selected experiences in the U.S. and Australia. J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 100:1 (1995), 36–46.
66. Mazri, C., Jovanovic, A., Balos, D., Set of key performance indicators related to emerging risks. Report in FP7 Project iNTeg-Risk Early Recognition, Monitoring and Integrated Management of Emerging, New Technology Related Risks, EU FP7 Grant Agreement no. CP-IP 213345-2, 2011.
67. Mazri, C., Jovanovic, A., Balos, D., Descriptive model of indicators for environment, health and safety management. Chem. Eng. Trans. 26 (2012), 471–476.
68. Moss, T., The governance of land use in river basins: prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU Water Framework Directive. Land Use Policy 21:1 (2004), 85–94.
69. Moss, B., The Water Framework Directive: total environment or political compromise?. Sci. Total Environ. 400:1–3 (2008), 32–41.
70. Müller-Grabherr, D., Valentin Florin, M., Harris, B., Crilly, D., Gugic, G., Vegter, J., Slob, A., Borowski, I., Brils, J., Integrated river basin management and risk governance. Brils, J., Müller-Grabherr, D., Négrel, P., Vermaat, J.E., (eds.) Risk-informed Management of European River Basins, 2014, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 241–264.
71. Nielsen, H.Ø., Frederiksen, P., Saarikoski, H., Rytkönen, A.M., Pedersen, A.B., How different institutional arrangements promote integrated river basin management. Evidence from the Baltic Sea region. Land Use Policy 30:1 (2013), 437–445.
72. Nõges, T., Literature Review on Indicators and Criteria Applied in Assessment of Ecological Status of Lakes and Rivers. 2002, Tartu University, Estonia.
73. Oliveira, R.E.S., Lima, M.M.C.L., Vieira, J.M.P., An indicator system for surface water quality in river basins. The Fourth Inter-Celtic Colloquium on Hydrology and Management of Water Resources, Guimarães, Portugal, 11–14 July 2005, 2005.
74. Pahl-Wostl, C., The implications of complexity for integrated management. Environ. Model. Softw. 22:5 (2007), 561–569.
75. Parliament, U.K., Chapter 2: Implementation of EU Water Legislation. 2012 (Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201012/ldselect/ldeucom/296/29605.htm Accessed 04 June 2016).
76. Petersen, T., Klauer, B., Manstetten, R., The environment as a challenge for governmental responsibility – the case of the European Water Framework Directive. Ecol. Econ. 6897 (2009), 2058–2065.
77. Porto, M., Lobato, F., Mechanisms of water management: command & control and social mechanisms (parte 1 de 2). REGA Revista de Gestão de Água da América Latina 1:2 (2004), 113–129.
78. Prato, S., La Valle, P., De Luca, E., Lattanzi, L., Migliore, G., Morgana, J.G., Munari, C., Nicoletti, L., Izzo, G., Mistri, M., The “one-out, all-out” principle entails the risk of imposing unnecessary restoration costs: a study case in two Mediterranean coastal lakes. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 80:1–2 (2014), 30–40.
79. Prichard, E., Makuch, K.E., Environmental law standards and principles of good laboratory practice for environmental protection. Makuch, K.E., Pereira, R., (eds.) Environmental and Energy Law, 2012, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, 463–482.
80. Rettman, A., Brussels Names and Shames EU Water Laggards. 2007 (Available at: https://euobserver.com/news/23758 Accessed 03 August 2016).
81. Sabatier, P.A., Focht, W., Lubell, M., Trachtenberg, Z., Vedlitz, A., Matlock, M., Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management. 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
82. Sabel, C.F., Zeitlin, J., Experimentalist governance. Levi-Faur, D., (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Governance, 2012, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 169–183.
83. Salas, F., Neto, J.M., Borja, A., Marques, J.C., Evaluation of the applicability of a marine biotic index to characterize the status of estuarine ecosystems: the case of Mondego estuary (Portugal). Ecol. Indic. 4 (2004), 215–225.
84. Scott, J., Holder, J., Law and new environmental governance in the European Union. Scott, J., De Búrca, G., (eds.) Law and New Governance in the EU and US, 2006, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 211–242.
85. Solimini, A.G., Ptacnik, R., Cardoso, A.C., Towards holistic assessment of the functioning of ecosystems under the Water Framework Directive. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 28:2 (2009), 143–149.
86. Spiral Project, Reflections on Recent Experience With the Water Framework Directive. 2013 (Available at: http://www.spiral-project.eu/sites/default/files/19_SPIs_WaterFrameworkDirective.pdf Accessed 03 June 2016).
87. Spray, C., Blackstock, K., Optimising Water Framework Directive River Basin Management Planning Using an Ecosystem Services Approach, CD2012_17. 2013 (Available online at: crew.ac.uk/publications).
88. Steyaert, P., Ollivier, G., The European water framework directive: how ecological assumptions frame technical and social change. Ecol. Soc., 12(1), 2007.
89. Steyaert, P., Barzman, M., Billaud, J.P., Brives, H., Hubert, B., Ollivier, G., Roche, B., The role of knowledge and research in facilitating social learning among stakeholders in natural resources management in the French Atlantic coastal wetlands. Environ. Sci. Pol. 10:6 (2007), 537–550.
90. Teodosiu, C., Barjoveanu, G., Teleman, D., Sustainable water resources management 1. River basin management and the ec Water Framework Directive. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2 (2003), 377–394.
91. Tippett, J., The value of combining a systems view of sustainability with a participatory protocol for ecologically informed design in river basin. Environ. Model. Softw. 20:2 (2005), 119–139.
92. van Rijswick, H.F.M.W., Backes, C.W., Ground breaking landmark case on environmental quality standards?. J. Eur. Environ. Plan. Law 12 (2015), 363–366.
93. Vincent, C., Heinrich, H., Edwards, A., Nygaard, K., Haythornthwaite, J., Guidance on typology, classification and reference conditions for transitional and coastal waters. European Commission, Report of CIS WG2.4 (COAST), 2003, 119 ( http://forum.europa.eu.int/Public/irc/env/wfd/library?l =/framework_directive/guidance_documents&vm = detailed&sb = Title).
94. Vlachopoulou, M., Coughlin, D., Forrow, D., Kirk, S., Logan, P., Voulvoulis, N., The potential of using the ecosystem approach in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Sci. Total Environ. 470–471 (2014), 684–694.
95. Von Homeyer, I., Emerging experimentalism in EU environmental governance. Sabel, C.F., Zeitlin, J., (eds.) Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture, 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 121–150.
96. Voulvoulis, N., Water and sanitation provision in a low carbon society: the need for a systems approach. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy, 4(4), 2012, 041403.
97. WWF & EEB, ‘Tips and Tricks’ for Water Framework Directive Implementation: a Resource Document for Environmental NGOs on the EU Guidance for the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive. 2004 (Available at: http://www.rivernet.org/general/docs/200403_EEB_WWF_Tips&Tricks.pdf Accessed 07 June 2016).