Restoring riparian ecosystems: The challenge of accommodating variability and designing restoration trajectories

Ecology and Society

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2005, Pages

  Hughes, Francine M R ^a   Colston, Adrian ^b   Mountford, J Owen ^c  

^a ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Wicken Fen National Nature Reserve   (United Kingdom)

^c CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Floodplain forests; Predictability; Reference systems; Restoration evaluation; Restoration objectives; Restoration trajectories; River restoration; Variability; Wicken Fen

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; FLOODPLAIN FOREST; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RIVER MANAGEMENT;

CAMBRIDGESHIRE; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE; WICKEN FEN; WORLD;

EID: 27444439108     PISSN: 17083087     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-01292-100112     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Adams, W. M. 2003. Future Nature: a vision for conservation. Earthscan, London, UK.
2. Adams, W. M., and M. R. Perrow. 1999. Scientific and institutional constraints on the restoration of European floodplains. Pages 89-97 in S. B. Marriott, and J. Alexander, editors. Floodplains: interdisciplinary approaches. Special Publication 163. Geological Society of London, London, UK.
3. Adams, W. M., M. R. Perrow, and A. Carpenter. 2004. Conservatives and champions: river managers and the river restoration discourse in the UK. Environment and Planning A 36:1929-1942.
4. Allen, J. A., B. D. Keeland, J. A. Stanturf, A. F. Lewell, and H. E. Kennedy, Jr. 2001. A guide to bottomland hardwood restoration. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD/ITR-2000-0011. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-40.
5. Andersen, D. C., and D. J. Cooper. 2000. Plant-herbivore-hydroperiod interactions: effects of native mammals on floodplain tree recruitment. Ecological Applications 10:1384-1399.
6. Anderson, D. H., and B. D. Dugger. 1998. A conceptual basis for evaluating restoration success. Pages 111-120 in K. G. Wadsworth, editor. Changing resource values in challenging times; transactions of the 63rd North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.
7. Andersson, E., C. Nilsson, and M. E. Johansson. 2000. Plant dispersal in boreal rivers and its relation to the diversity of riparian flora. Journal of Biogeography 27:1095-1106.
8. Astbury, A. K. 1957. The black fens. Golden Head Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Baker, W. L. 1990. Climate and hydrologic effects on the regeneration of Populus angustifolia James along the Animas River, Colorado. Journal of Biogeography 17:59-73.
10. Berger, J. J. 1991. A generic framework for evaluating complex restoration and conservation projects. Environmental Professional 13:254-262.
11. Bloom, A. 1944. The farm in the fen. Faber and Faber, London, UK.
12. Bradshaw, A. D. 1983. The reconstruction of ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology 20:1-18.
13. Brookes, A., J. Baker, and C. Redmond. 1996. Floodplain restoration and riparian zone management. Pages 201-229 in A. Brookes and F. D. Shields, Jr., editors. River channel restoration: guiding principles for sustainable projects. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
14. Carey, P. D. 2001. Schemes are monitored and effective in the UK. Nature 414:687.
15. Church, M. 2002. Geomorphic thresholds in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology 47:541-557.
16. Colston, A. 2003. Beyond preservation: the challenge of ecological restoration. Pages 247-267 in W. M. Adams and M. Mulligan, editors. Decolonizing Nature: strategies for conservation in a post-colonial era. Earthscan, London, UK.
17. Council of Europe. 2004. European strategy on invasive alien species. Nature and Environment, Number 137. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, France.
18. Cordes, L. D., F. M. R. Hughes, and M. Getty. 1997. Factors affecting the regeneration and distribution of riparian woodlands along a northern prairie river: the Red Deer River, Alberta, Canada. Journal of Biogeography 24:675-695.
19. Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)/Environment Agency. 2002. Broad scale ecosystem impact modelling tools: scoping study. Final Report of project FD 2108. DEFRA Flood Management Division, London, UK.
20. Downs, P. W., K. S. Skinner, and G. M. Kondolf. 2003. Rivers and streams. Pages 267-296 in M. R. Perrow and A. J. Davy. Handbook of ecological restoration. Volume 2. Restoration in practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
21. Edmonds, R. L., R. C. Francis, N. J. Mantua, and D. L. Peterson. 2003. Sources of climate variability in river ecosystems. Pages 11-37 in R. C. Wissmar and P. A. Bisson, editors. Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and managed systems. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
22. European Union Habitats Committee. 1999. Interpretation manual of European Union habitats. European Union, Brussels, Belgium.
23. Friday, L. E., and T. A. Rowell. 1997. Patterns and processes. Pages 11-21 in L. Friday, editor. Wicken Fen: the making of a wetland nature reserve. Harley Books, Colchester, UK.
24. Friday, L. E., and A. Colston. 1999. Wicken Fen - the restoration of a wetland nature reserve. British Wildlife (October):37-46.
25. Friday, L. E., and T. P. Moorhouse. 1999. Wicken Fen: the wider vision: Report to the National Trust. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
26. Gallois, R. W. 1988. Geology of the country around Ely. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, Sheet 173. British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK.
27. Gerrard, C. 2004. The Great Fen project. Available online at www.greatfen.org.uk/project.pdf.
28. Girel, J., F. Vautier, and J.-L. Peiry. 2003. Biodiversity and land-use history of the Alpine riparian landscapes (the example of the Isère River valley, France). Pages 167-200 in Ü. Mander and M. Antrop, editors. Multifunctional landscapes. Volume 3. Continuity and change. WIT Press, Southampton, UK.
29. Grout, M. W., and M. I. Whiteman. 2000. Management of groundwater resources within the Anglian Region of the Environment Agency. Pages 1.19-1.29 in Proceedings of the British Hydrological Society: 7th National Hydrology Symposium. British Hydrological Society, Newcastle, UK.
30. Grove, J. M. 1988. The little ice age. Routledge, London, UK.
31. Harris, R. R. 1999. Defining reference conditions for restoration of riparian plant communities: examples from California, USA. Environmental Management 24:55-63.
32. Hanson-Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). 2004. Hanson-RSPB wetland project: creating Britain's largest reedbed for wildlife and people. RSPB, Sandy, UK.
33. Hengeveld, R. 1994. Biogeographical ecology. Journal of Biogeography 21:341-351.
34. Holmes, N. T. H. 1991. Post-project appraisal of conservation enhancement of flood defence works. Research and Development Project Report. National Rivers Authority, Bristol, UK.
35. Hughes F. M. R. 1997. Floodplain biogeomorphology. Progress in Physical Geography 21:501-529.
36. Hughes, F. M. R., editor. 2003. The flooded forest: guidance for policy makers and river managers in Europe on the restoration of floodplain forests. FLOBAR2, Department of Geography. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
37. Hughes, F. M. R., and Rood, S. B. 2003. The allocation of river flows for the restoration of woody riparian and floodplain forest ecosystems: a review of approaches and their application in Europe. Environmental Management 32:12-33.
38. Johansson, M. E., C. Nilsson, and E. Nilsson. 1996. Do rivers function as corridors for plant dispersal? Journal of Vegetation Science 7:593-598.
39. Johnson, W. C. 2002. Riparian vegetation diversity along regulated rivers: contribution of novel and relict habitats. Freshwater Biology 47:749-759.
40. Junk, W. J. 1989. Flood tolerance and tree distribution in central Amazonian floodplains. Pages 47-64 in L. B. Holm-Nielsen, L. B. Nielsen, and H. Balslev, editors. Tropical forests. Academic Press, London, UK.
41. Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley, and R. E. Sparks. 1989. The flood-pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106:110-127.
42. Kalliola, R., and M. Puhakka. 1988. River dynamics and vegetation mosaicism: a case study of the River Kamajohka, northernmost Finland. Journal of Biogeography 15:703-719.
43. Kangas, P. C. 1989. Long-term development of forested wetlands. Pages 25-51 in A. Lugo, M. M. Brinson, and S. Brown, editors. Forested wetlands. Elsevier, New York, New York, USA.
44. Klimo, E., and H. Hager, editors. 2001. The floodplain forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives. European Forest Institute Research Report Number 10. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands.
45. Klötzli, F., and A. P. Grootjans. 2001. Restoration of natural and semi-natural wetland systems in central Europe: progress and predictability of developments. Restoration Ecology 9:209-219.
46. Kondolf, G. M. 1995. Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3:133-136.
47. Koutaniemi, L. 1991. Glacio-isostatically adjusted palaeohydrology, the rivers Ivalojoki and Oulankajoki, Northern Finland. Pages 65-78 in L. Starkel, K. J. Gregory, and J. B. Thornes, editors. Temperate palaeohydrology: fluvial processes in the temperate zone during the last 15000 years. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
48. Lefèvre, F., and D. Kajba. 2001. Indicators for monitoring genetic diversity. Pages 36-43 in F. Lefèvre, N. Barsoum, B. Heinze, D. Kajba, P. Rotach, S. M. G. de Vries, and J. Turok, editors. In situ conservation of Populus nigra. EUFORGEN Technical Bulletin. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.
49. MacDonald, G. M. 1987. Postglacial development of the subalpine-boreal transition forest of western Canada. Journal of Ecology 75:303-320.
50. Maizels, J., and J. Aitken. 1991. Palaeohydrological change during deglaciation in upland Britain: a case study from northeast Scotland. Pages 105-145 in L. Starkel, K. J. Gregory, and J. B. Thornes, editors. Temperate palaeohydrology: fluvial processes in the temperate zone during the last 15000 years. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
51. McCartney, M. P., and A. de la Hera. 2004. Hydrological assessment for wetland conservation at Wicken Fen. Wetlands Ecology and Management 12:189-204.
52. Middelkoop, H., J. H. Berg, M. M. van den Schoor, A. M. Alabyan, D. B. Babich, M. A. Shoubin, and J. de Krammer. 2003. Biomorphodynamics of the Allier and lower Volga rivers a reference study for river rehabilitation in the Netherlands. Page 54 in A. D. Buijse, R. S. E. W. Leuven, and M. Greijdanus-Klaas, editors. Lowland river rehabilitation 2003 - an international conference addressing the opportunities and constraints, costs and benefits to rehabilitate natural dynamics, landscapes and biodiversity in large regulated lowland rivers. Netherlands Centre for River Studies, Delft, The Netherlands.
53. Mitsch, W. J. 1993. Ecological engineering: a cooperative role with the planetary life-support systems. Environmental Science and Technology 27:438-445.
54. Mitsch, W. J., and R. F. Wilson. 1996. Improving the success of wetland restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecological Applications 6:77-83.
55. Montgomery, D. R., and S. M. Boulton. 2003. Pages 39-80 in R. C. Wissmar and P. A. Bisson, editors. Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and managed systems. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
56. Moore, N. W. 1997. The Fenland Reserves. Pages 3-8 in L. Friday, editor. Wicken Fen: the making of a wetland nature reserve. Harley Books, Colchester, UK.
57. Moorhouse, T. P. 1999. The restoration of fen habitats on former arable land: a literature review. Report to the National Trust. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
58. Moss, T., A. Klaphake, J. Monstadt, and M. Siener. 2003. What prospects for restoration? Pages 71-84 in F. M. R. Hughes, editor. 2003. The flooded forest: guidance for policy makers and river managers in Europe on the restoration of floodplain forests. FLOBAR2, Department of Geography. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
59. Mountford, J. O., J. M. Cooper, D. B. Roy, and E. A. Warman. 1999. Targeting areas for the restoration and re-creation of coastal and floodplain grazing marsh. English Nature Research Report Number 332. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.
60. Mountford, J. O., S. S. Folwell, S. J. Manchester, J. R. Meigh, R. A. Wadsworth, and M. P. McCartney. 2004. Feasibility study for wetland restoration at Baston and Thurlby Fens. Final Report to the Baston and Thurlby Fens Project Steering Group. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, UK.
61. Naiman, R. J., and H. Décamps. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:621-658.
62. National Assessment Synthesis Team (NAST). 2000. Climate change impacts on the United States: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, D.C., USA.
63. Nilsson, C. 1987. Distribution of stream-edge vegetation along a gradient of current velocity. Journal of Ecology 75:513-522.
64. Nilsson, C., A. Ekblad, M. Gardfjell, and B. Carlberg. 1991a. Long-term effects of river regulation on river margin vegetation. Journal of Applied Ecology 28:963-987
65. Nilsson, C., G. Grelsson, M. Dynesius, M. Johansson, and U. Sperens. 1991b. Small rivers behave like large rivers: effects of post-glacial history on plant species richness along riverbanks. Journal of Biogeography 18:533-541.
66. Odum, H. T. 1989. Ecological engineering and self-organisation. Pages 79-101 in W. M. Mitsch and S. E. Jøgensen, editors. Ecological engineering: an introduction to ecotechnology. Wiley Interscience, New York, New York, USA.
67. Pace, M. L. 2001. Predictions and the aquatic sciences. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:63-72.
68. Patton, P. C., and V. R. Baker. 1980. Geomorphic responses of central Texas stream channels to catastrophic rainfall and runoff. Pages 189-217 in D. O. Doehring, editor. Geomorphology in arid regions. Allen and Unwin, London, UK.
69. Pautou, G., J. Girel, J.-L. Peiry, F. M. R. Hughes, K. S. Richards, R. Foussadier, B. Garguet-Duport, T. Harris, and N. Barsoum. 1996. Les changements de végétation dans les hydrosystèmes fluviaux: l'exemple du Haut-Rhône et de l'Isère dans le Gresivaudan. Revue d'Écologie alpine 3:41-66.
70. Pautou, G., J.-L. Peiry, J. Girel, E. Blanchard, F. M. R. Hughes, K. S. Richards, T. Harris, A. El-Hames, and R. Foussadier. 1997. Space-time units in floodplains: the example of the Drac River upstream of Grenoble (French Alps). Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 6:311-319.
71. Peters, R. H. 1991. A critique for ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
72. Petts, G. E. 1990. The role of ecotones in aquatic landscape management. Pages 227-261 in R. J. Naiman and H. Décamps, editors. The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. UNESCO/MAB Series 4. Parthenon, New York, New York, USA.
73. Planty-Tabacchi, A.-M., E. Tabacchi, R. J. Naiman, C. DeFerrari, and H. Décamps. 1996. Invasibility of species-rich communities in riparian zones. Conservation Biology 10:598-607.
74. Poff, N. L., and J. V. Ward. 1989. Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46:1805-1818.
75. Postel, S., and B. Richter. 2003. Rivers for life: managing water for people and nature. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
76. Probst, J.-L. 1989. Hydroclimatic fluctuations of some European rivers since 1800. Pages 41-55 in G. E. Petts, H. Möller, and A. L. Roux, editors. Historical change of large alluvial rivers: western Europe. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
77. Ratcliffe, D.A., editor. 1977. A nature conservation review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
78. Richards, K. S., J. Brasington, and F. M. R. Hughes. 2002. Geomorphic dynamics of floodplains: ecological implications and a potential modelling strategy. Freshwater Biology 47: 559-579.
79. Rodwell, J. S., editor. 1991a. British plant communities. Volume 1. Woodlands and scrub. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
80. Rodwell, J. S., editor. 1991b. British plant communities. Volume 2. Mires and heath. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
81. Rodwell, J. S., editor. 1992. British plant communities. Volume 3. Grasslands and montane communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
82. Rodwell, J. S., editor. 1995. British plant communities. Volume 4. Aquatic communities, swamps and tall-herb fens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
83. Rodwell, J. S., editor. 2000. British plant communities. Volume 5. Maritime communities and vegetation of open habitats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
84. Rood, S. B., and J. M. Mahoney. 1990. The collapse of river valley forests downstream from dams in the western prairies: probable causes and prospects for mitigation. Environmental Management 14:451-464.
85. Rowell, T. A. 1997. The history of Wicken Fen. Pages 187-212 in L. Friday, editor. Wicken Fen: the making of a wetland nature reserve. Harley Books, Colchester, UK.
86. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). 2003. The Fens: the RSPB's vision for wetlands in the Fens. RSBP, Sandy, UK. Available online at www.rspb.org.
87. Schumaker, N. H., T. Ernst, D. White, J. Baker, and P. Hagerty. 2004. Projecting wildlife responses to alternative future landscapes in Oregon's Willamette Basin. Ecological Applications 14:381-400.
88. Sear, D., D. Wilcock, M. Robinson, and K. Fisher. 2000. River channel modification in the UK. Pages 55-81 in M. Acreman, editor. The hydrology of the United Kingdom: a study of change. Routledge, London, UK.
89. Simons, J., and R. Boeters. 1998. A systematic approach to ecologically sound river bank management. Pages 57-85 in L. C. de Waal, A. R. G. Large, and P. M. Wade, editors. Rehabilitation of rivers: principles and implementation. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
90. Starkel, L. 1983. The reflection of hydrologic changes in the fluvial environment of the temperate zone during the last 15,000 years. Pages 213-235 in K. J. Gregory, editor. Background to palaeohydrology. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
91. Starkel, L. 1991a. Long-distance correlation of fluvial events in the temperate zone. Pages 473-495 in L. Starkel, K. J. Gregory, and J. B. Thornes, editors. Temperate palaeohydrology: fluvial processes in the temperate zone during the last 15000 years. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
92. Starkel, L. 1991b. The Vistula River valley: a case study for central Europe. Pages 171-188 in L. Starkel, K. J. Gregory, and J. B. Thornes, editors. Temperate palaeohydrology: fluvial processes in the temperate zone during the last 15000 years. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
93. Stream Corridor Working Group. 1998. Stream corridor restoration: principles, processes and practices. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA. Available online at www.nrcs.usda.gov.
94. UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC). 2000. European forests and protected areas: gap analysis. Technical Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
95. Vera, F. W. M. 2000. Grazing ecology and forest history. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
96. Van Dam, B. C., and S. Bordács, editors. 2002. Genetic diversity in river populations of European black poplar: implications for riparian eco-system management; proceedings of an International Symposium on Genetic Diversity in River Populations of European Black Poplar. (Szekszard, Hungary, 2001). Verlag C. Nyomda, Budapest, Hungary.
97. Wade, P. M., A. R. G. Large, and L. C. de Waal. 1998. Rehabilitation of degraded river habitat: an introduction. Pages 1-10 in L. C. de Waal, A. R. G. Large, and P. M. Wade, editors. Rehabilitation of rivers: principles and implementation. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
98. Ward, J. V., K. Tockner, D. B. Arscott, and C. Claret. 2002. Riverine landscape diversity. Freshwater Biology 47:517-539.
99. Wissmar, R. C. and P. A. Bisson. 2003. Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty. Pages 3-7 in R. C. Wissmar and P. A. Bisson, editors. Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and managed systems. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
100. Wissmar, R. C., J. H. Braatne, R. L. Beschta, and S. B. Rood. 2003. Variability of riparian ecosystems: implications for restoration. Pages 107-127 in R. C. Wissmar and P. A. Bisson, editors. Strategies for restoring river ecosystems: sources of variability and uncertainty in natural and managed systems. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
101. Xiong, S., M. Johansson, F. M. R. Hughes, A. Hayes, K. S. Richards, and C. Nilsson. 2003. Interactive effects of soil moisture, vegetation canopy, plant litter and seeds on diversity in a British wetland plant community. Journal of Ecology 91:976-986.