Monte Carlo–based quantitative structure–activity relationship models for toxicity of organic chemicals to Daphnia magna

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 2691-2697

  Toropova, Alla P ^a   Toropov, Andrey A ^a   Veselinović, Aleksandar M ^b   Veselinović, Jovana B ^b   Leszczynska, Danuta ^c   Leszczynski, Jerzy ^d  

^a MARIO NEGRI INSTITUTE FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NI   (Serbia)

^c Jackson State University   (United States)

^d JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aquatic toxicology; Computational toxicology; Ecological risk assessment; Environmental toxicology; Organic contaminant

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY;

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY; COMPUTATIONAL TOXICOLOGY; ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY; ORGANIC CONTAMINANT;

ORGANIC CHEMICALS;

ORGANIC COMPOUND;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ECOTOXICOLOGY; MODEL VALIDATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; ORGANIC COMPOUND; ORGANIC POLLUTANT; PLANKTON; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE; TOXICITY;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DAPHNIA MAGNA; ECOTOXICITY; LC50; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; VALIDATION STUDY; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DAPHNIA; DRUG EFFECTS; METABOLISM; SOFTWARE;

DAPHNIA MAGNA;

ANIMALS; DAPHNIA; MONTE CARLO METHOD; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84992109216     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3466     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Mackay D, Hubbarde J, Webster E. 2003. The role of QSARs and fate models in chemical hazard and risk assessment. QSAR Comb Sci 22:106–112.
2. Furtula B, Gutman I. 2011. Relation between second and third geometric-arithmetic indices of trees. J Chemom 25:87–91.
3. Afantitis A, Melagraki G, Koutentis PA, Sarimveis H, Kollias G. 2011. Ligand-based virtual screening procedure for the prediction and the identification of novel β-amyloid aggregation inhibitors using Kohonen maps and counterpropagation artificial neural networks. Eur J Med Chem 46:497–508.
4. Afantitis A, Melagraki G, Sarimveis H, Koutentis PA, Igglessi-Markopoulou O, Kollias G. 2010. A combined LS-SVM & MLR QSAR workflow for predicting the inhibition of CXCR3 receptor by quinazolinone analogs. Mol Divers 14:225–235.
5. Duchowicz PR, Comelli NC, Ortiz EV, Castro EA. 2012. QSAR study for carcinogenicity in a large set of organic compounds. Curr Drug Saf 7:282–288.
6. Ghaedi A. 2015. Predicting the cytotoxicity of ionic liquids using QSAR model based on SMILES optimal descriptors. J Mol Liq 208:269–279.
7. Li Q, Ding X, Si H, Gao H. 2014. QSAR model based on SMILES of inhibitory rate of 2,3-diarylpropenoic acids on AKR1C3. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 139:132–138.
8. Masand VH, Toropov AA, Toropova AP, Mahajan DT. 2014. QSAR models for anti-malarial activity of 4-aminoquinolines. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 10:75–82.
9. Scotti L, Lima EO, da Silva MS, Ishiki H, Lima IO, Pereira FO, Mendonça FJB Jr, Scotti MT. 2014. Docking and PLS studies on a set of thiophenes RNA polymerase inhibitors against Staphylococcus aureus. Curr Top Med Chem 14:64–80.
10. Scotti L, Ishiki H, Ferreira MJP, Francisco JBM Jr, De P Emerenciano V, Silva MS, Scotti MT. 2012. In silico methods applied in food chemistry: A short review with bitter and mutagenic compounds. Lett Drug Des Discov 9:527–534.
11. Speck-Planche A, Kleandrova VV, Luan F, Cordeiro MNDs. 2015. Computational modeling in nanomedicine: Prediction of multiple antibacterial profiles of nanoparticles using a quantitative structure–activity relationship perturbation model. Nanomedicine 10:193–204.
12. Torrens F, Castellano G. 2014. QSPR prediction of chromatographic retention times of pesticides: Partition and fractal indices. J Environ Sci Health B 49:400–407.
13. Torrens F, Castellano G. 2012. QSPR prediction of retention times of phenylurea herbicides by biological plastic evolution. Curr Drug Saf 7:262–268.
14. van der Jagt K, Munn S, Torslov J, de Bruijn J, eds. 2004. Alternative approaches can reduce the use of test animals under REACH. Addendum to: Assessment of additional testing needs under REACH effects of (Q)SARS, risk based testing and voluntary industry initiatives. IHCP report EUR 21405 EN. Joint Research Centre Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.
15. Ivanciuc O. 2013. Chemical graphs, molecular matrices and topological indices in chemoinformatics and quantitative structure-activity relationships. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 9:153–163.
16. Weininger D. 1988. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 28:31–36.
17. Weininger D, Weininger A, Weininger JL. 1989. SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 29:97–101.
18. Weininger D. 1990. SMILES. 3. Depict. Graphical depiction of chemical structures. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 30:237–243.
19. Živković JV, Trutić NV, Veselinović JB, Nikolić GM, Veselinović AM. 2015. Monte Carlo method based QSAR modeling of maleimide derivatives as glycogen synthase kinase-3β inhibitors. Comput Biol Med 64:276–282.
20. Veselinović JB, Nikolić GM, Trutić NV, Živković JV, Veselinović AM. 2015. Monte Carlo QSAR models for predicting organophosphate inhibition of acetylcholinesterase. SAR QSAR Environ Res 26:449–460.
21. Veselinović AM, Veselinović JB, Živković JV, Nikolić GM. 2015. Application of smiles notation based optimal descriptors in drug discovery and design. Curr Top Med Chem 15:1768–1779.
22. Achary PGR. 2014. QSPR modelling of dielectric constants of π-conjugated organic compounds by means of the CORAL software. SAR QSAR Environ Res 25:507–526.
23. Worachartcheewan A, Nantasenamat C, Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya C, Prachayasittikul V. 2014. QSAR study of H1N1 neuraminidase inhibitors from influenza a virus. Lett Drug Des Discov 11:420–427.
24. Achary PGR. 2014. Simplified molecular input line entry system-based optimal descriptors: QSAR modelling for voltage-gated potassium channel subunit Kv7.2. SAR QSAR Environ Res 25:73–90.
25. García J, Duchowicz PR, Rozas MF, Caram JA, Mirífico MV, Fernández FM, Castro EA. 2011. A comparative QSAR on 1,2,5-thiadiazolidin-3-one 1,1-dioxide compounds as selective inhibitors of human serine proteinases. J Mol Graph Model 31:10–19.
26. Mullen LMA, Duchowicz PR, Castro EA. 2011. QSAR treatment on a new class of triphenylmethyl-containing compounds as potent anticancer agents. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 107:269–275.
27. Zhang X, Qin W, He J, Wen Y, Su L, Sheng L, Zhao Y. 2013. Discrimination of excess toxicity from narcotic effect: Comparison of toxicity of class-based organic chemicals to Daphnia magna and Tetrahymena pyriformis. Chemosphere 93:397–407.
28. Toropova AP, Toropov AA, Benfenati E, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J. 2015. QSAR model as a random event: A case of rat toxicity. Bioorg Med Chem 23:1223–1230.
29. Toropova AP, Toropov AA, Benfenati E, Gini G, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J. 2011. CORAL: Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for estimating toxicity of organic compounds in rats. J Comput Chem 32:2727–2733.
30. Toropova AP, Toropov AA, Veselinović JB, Veselinović AM. 2015. QSAR as a random event: A case of NOAEL. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:8264–8271.
31. Toropova AP, Toropov AA, Rallo R, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J. 2015. Optimal descriptor as a translator of eclectic data into prediction of cytotoxicity for metal oxide nanoparticles under different conditions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 112:39–45.
32. Toropova MA, Toropov AA, Raška I, Rašková M. 2015. Searching therapeutic agents for treatment of Alzheimer disease using the Monte Carlo method. Comput Biol Med 64:148–154.
33. 2 metrics for validation of QSPR models. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 107:194–205.
34. Vikas R. 2015. Exploring the role of quantum chemical descriptors in modeling acute toxicity of diverse chemicals to Daphnia magna. J Mol Graph Model 61:89–101.
35. Kar S, Roy K. 2010. QSAR modeling of toxicity of diverse organic chemicals to Daphnia magna using 2D and 3D descriptors. J Hazard Mater 177:344–351.
36. Cassani S, Kovarich S, Papa E, Roy PP, van der Wal L, Gramatica P. 2013. Daphnia and fish toxicity of (benzo)triazoles: Validated QSAR models, and interspecies quantitative activity–activity modeling. J Hazard Mater 258–259:50–60.
37. Toropova AP, Toropov AA, Martyanov SE, Benfenati E, Gini G, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J. 2012. CORAL: QSAR modeling of toxicity of organic chemicals toward Daphnia magna. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 110:177–181.
38. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2007. Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative)structure–activity relationship [(Q)SAR] models. Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 69. ENV/JM/MONO(2007)2. Paris, France.