Design and fabrication of 3D-printed anatomically shaped lumbar cage for intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration treatment

Biofabrication

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Serra, T ^a   Capelli, C ^b   Toumpaniari, R ^c   Orriss, I R ^d   Leong, J J H ^a,e   Dalgarno, K ^c   Kalaskar, D M ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL VETERINARY COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^e ROYAL NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D printing; design; fabrication; finite element analysis; IVD; lumber cage; nano hydroxyapatide

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; CELL CULTURE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DESIGN; FABRICATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; PATIENT REHABILITATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURGERY;

3-D PRINTING; ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY; DESIGN AND MANUFACTURES; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; NANO HYDROXYAPATIDE; SURFACE CHARACTERISATION; SURGICAL APPLICATIONS; X RAY MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

3D PRINTERS;

BIOMATERIAL;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; DEVICES; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; SPINE FUSION; STEM CELL; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SPINAL FUSION; STEM CELLS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84992029471     PISSN: 17585082     EISSN: 17585090     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Burton A K et al 2006 European guidelines for prevention in low back pain Eur. Spine J. 15 S136-68
2. Malandrino A, Noailly J and Lacroix D 2011 The effect of sustained compression on oxygen metabolic transport in the intervertebral disc decreases with degenerative changes PLoS Comput. Biol. 7 e1002112
3. Giorgi H, Prébet R, Delhaye M, Aurouer N, Mangione P, Blondel B, Tropiano P, Fuentes S and Parent H F 2015 French Society of Sprine Surgery (SFCR) Minimally invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: One-year postoperative morbidity, clinical and radiological results of a prospective multicenter study of 182 cases Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 101(6 Suppl) S241-5
4. Thavaneswaran P and Vandepeer M 2014 Lumbar artificial intervertebral disc replacement: a systematic review ANZ J. Surg. 84 121-7
5. Kuslich S D, Ulstrom C L, Griffith S L, Ahern J W and Dowdle J D 1998 The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion, history, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial Spine 23 1267-78 (Phila Pa 1976) ; discussion 1279
6. Kanayama M, Cunningham B W, Haggerty C J, Abumi K, Kaneda K and McAfee P C 2000 In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices J Neurosurg. 93 259-65
7. Cizek G R and Boyd L M 2000 Imaging pitfalls of interbody spinal implants Spine 25 2633-6 (Phila Pa 1976)
8. Nemoto O, Asazuma T, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Yasuoka H and Fujikawa A 2014 Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation Eur. Spine J. 23 2150-5
9. Vadapalli S, Sairyo K, Goel V K, Robon M, Biyani A, Khandha A and Ebraheim N A 2006 Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study Spine 31 E992-8 (Phila Pa 1976)
10. Palissery V, Mulholland R C and McNally D S 2009 The implications of stress patterns in the vertebral body under axial support of an artificial implant Med. Eng. Phys. 31 833-7
11. Eswaran S K, Gupta A, Adams M F and Keaveny T M 2006 Cortical and trabecular load sharing in the human vertebral body J. Bone Miner. Res. 21 307-14
12. Fields A J, Lee G L and Keaveny T M 2010 Mechanisms of initial endplate failure in the human vertebral body J. Biomech. 43 3126-31
13. Smit T H, Muller R, van Dijk M and Wuisman P I 2003 Changes in bone architecture during spinal fusion: three years follow-up and the role of cage stiffness Spine 28 1802-8 (discussion1809)
14. Serra T, Mateos-Timoneda M A, Planell J A and Navarro M 2013 3D printed PLA-based scaffolds: a versatile tool in regenerative medicine Organogenesis 9 239-44
15. Melchels F P W, Domingos M A N, Klein T J, Malda J, Bartolo P J and Hutmacher D W 2012 Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs Prog. Polym. Sci. 37 1079
16. Chaloupka K, Motwani M and Seifalian A M 2011 Development of a new lacrimal drainage conduit using POSS nanocomposite Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 58 363-70
17. Tan A, Madani S Y, Rajadas J, Pastorin G and Seifalian A M 2012 Synergistic photothermal ablative effects of functionalizing carbon nanotubes with a POSS-PCU nanocomposite polymer J. Nanobiotechnology 10 1-8
18. de Mel A, Punshon G, Ramesh B, Sarkar S, Darbyshire A, Hamilton G and Seifalian A M 2009 In situ endothelialisation potential of a biofunctionalized nanocomposite biomaterial-based small diameter bypass graft Biomed Mater Eng. 19(4-5) 317-31
19. Ahmed M 2011 Design and development of a prosthetic implant for cardiovascular reconstructions Doctoral Thesis, UCL (University College London (http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1334080/)
20. Jungebluth P et al 2011 Tracheobronchial transplantation with a stem-cell-seeded bioartificial nano-composite: a proof of-concept study Lancet 378 1997-2004
21. Lu F, Kang G, Jiang H, Zhang J and Liu Y 2014 Experimental studies on the uniaxial ratchetting of polycarbonate polymer at different temperatures Polym. Test. 39 92-100
22. Hellmich C, Fritsch A and Dormieux L 2011 Multiscale homogenization theory: an analysis tool for revealing mechanical design principles in bone and bone replacement materials Biomimetics - Materials, Structures and Processes, Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering (Berlin: Springer) pp 81-103
23. Noailly J, Lacroix D and Planell J A 2005 Finite element study of a novel intervertebral disc substitute Spine 30 2257-64
24. Williams J G 1984 Fracture Mechanics of Polymers (Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood)
25. Hench L L and Wilson J 1993 An Introduction to Bioceramics (Singapore: World Scientific) pp 25-40
26. Mohanty S, Larsen L B, Trifol J, Szabo P, Burri H V, Canali C, Dufva M, Emnéus J and Wolff A 2015 Fabrication of scalable and structured tissue engineering scaffolds using water dissolvable sacrificial 3D printed moulds Mater. Sci. Eng. C 55 569-78
27. Zein D W, Hutmacher K C and Tan S H 2002 Teoh. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications Biomaterials 23 1169-85
28. Rao P J, Pelletier M H, Walsh W R and Mobbs R J 2014 Spine interbody implants: material selection and modification, functionalization and bioactivation of surfaces to improve osseointegration Orthop. Surg. 6 81-9
29. Zhao Y, Wong H M, Wang W, Li P, Xu Z, Chong E Y, Yan C H, Yeung K W and Chu P K 2013 Cytocompatibility, osseointegration, and bioactivity of three-dimensional porous and nanostructured network on polyetheretherketone. Biomaterials 34 9264-77
30. Kurtz S M and Devine J N 2007 PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants Biomaterials 28 4845-69
31. Chen S, Jones J A, Xu Y, Low H Y, Anderson J M and Leong K W 2010 Characterization of topographical effects on macrophage behavior in a foreign body response model Biomaterials 31 3479-91
32. Deng Y, Liu X, Xu A, Wang L, Luo Z, Zheng Y, Deng F, Wei J, Tang Z and Wei S 2015 Effect of surface roughness on osteogenesis in vitro and osseointegration in vivo of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone-nanohydroxyapatite composite Int J Nanomedicine 10 1425-47
33. Kunzler T P, Drobek T, Schuler M and Spencer N D 2007 Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients Biomaterials. 28 2175-82