Advancing Our Understanding of the Interface Between Perception and Intergroup Relations

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 286-289

  Deska, Jason C ^a   Lloyd, E Paige ^a   Hugenberg, Kurt ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992027356     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2016.1215208     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. E.Balcetis, & D.Dunning, (2010). Wishful seeing:Desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science, 21, 147–152.
2. J.S.Bruner, & C.C.Goodman, (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 33–44.
3. E.M.Caruso, & E.Balcetis, (2009). Political partisanship influences perception of biracial candidates' skin tone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 20168–20173.
4. H.M.Claypool, M.K.Housley, K.Hugenberg, M.J.Bernstein, & D.M.Mackie, (2012). Easing in:Fluent processing brings others into the ingroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 441–455.
5. S.Cole, E.Balcetis, & D.Dunning, (2013). Affective signals of threat increase perceived proximity. Psychological Science, 24, 34–40.
6. F.H.Durgin, D.DeWald, S.Lechich, Z.Li, & Z.Ontiveros, (2011). Action and motivation:Measuring perception or strategies?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1077–1082.
7. K.M.Fincher, & P.E.Tetlock, (2016). Perceptual dehumanization of faces is activated by norm violations and facilitates norm enforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 145, 131–146.
8. C.Firestone, (2013). How “paternalistic” is spatial perception? Why wearing a heavy backpack doesn't—and couldn't—make hills look steeper. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 455–473.
9. J.B.Freeman, & N.Ambady, (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118, 247–279.
10. M.Inzlicht, C.R.Kaiser, & B.Major, (2008). The face of chauvinism:How prejudice expectations shape perceptions of facial affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 758–766.
11. K.L.Johnson, & R.B.Adams, (2013). Social vision:An introduction. Social Cognition, 31, 633–635.
12. J.W.Kunstman, T.Tuscherer, S.Trawalter, & E.P.Lloyd, (2016). What lies beneath? Minority group members' suspicion of Whites' egalitarian motivation predicts responses to Whites' smiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1193–1205. doi:10.1177/0146167216652860
13. D.T.Levin, & M.R.Banaji, (2006). Distortions in the perceived lightness of faces:the role of race categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 135, 501–512.
14. Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2013). Fluency of visual processing explains prejudiced evaluations following categorization of concealable identities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 419–425.
15. S.Pitts, J.P.Wilson, & K.Hugenberg, (2014). When one is ostracized, others loom:Social rejection makes other people appear closer. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 550–557.
16. D.R.Proffitt, (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 110–122.
17. J.Riskind, R.Moore, & L.Bowlby, (2006). The looming of spiders:The fearful perceptual distortion of movement and menace. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 171–178.
18. D.F.Sacco, J.H.Wirth, K.Hugenberg, Z.Chen, & K.D.Williams, (2011). The world in black and white:Ostracism enhances the categorical perception of social information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 836–842.
19. J.P.Wilson, Hugenberg, K., & Rule, N. O. (2016). Racial bias in judgments of physical size and formidability:Bottom-up and top-down factors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. Y.J.Xiao, & J.J.Van Bavel, (2012). See your friends close and your enemies closer:Social identity and identity threat shape the representation of physical distance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 959–972.