Action and motivation: Measuring perception or strategies?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1077-1082

  Durgin, Frank H ^a   DeWald, Dinah ^a   Lechich, Stephanie ^a   Li, Zhi ^a   Ontiveros, Zachary ^a  

^a SWARTHMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Action measures; Human factors; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 81355142094     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0164-z     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2010). Wishful seeing: More desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science, 21, 147-152.
2. Durgin, F. H., Baird, J. A., Greenburg, M., Russell, R., Shaughnessy, K., & Waymouth, S. (2009). Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 964-969. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 16. 5. 964.
3. Durgin, F. H., Hajnal, A., Li, Z., Tonge, N., & Stigliani, A. (2010a). Palm boards are not action measures: An alternative to the two-systems theory of geographical slant perception. Acta Psychologica, 134, 182-197. doi: 10. 1016/j. actpsy. 2010. 01. 009.
4. Durgin, F. H., Hajnal, A., Li, Z., Tonge, N., & Stigliani, A. (2010b). An imputed dissociation might be an artifact: Further evidence for the generalizability of the observations of Durgin et al. 2010. Acta Psychologica. doi: 10. 1016/j. actpsy. 2010. 09. 002.
5. Durgin, F. H., Ruff, A. J., & Russell, R. (in press). Constant enough: On the kinds of perceptual constancy worth having. In G. Hatfield & S. Allred (Eds.), Visual experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Eby, D. W., & Loomis, J. M. (1987). A study of visually directed throwing in the presence of multiple distance cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 308-312.
7. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of visual surfaces. The American Journal of Psychology, 63, 367-384.
8. Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H. (2011). Design, data, and theory regarding a digital hand inclinometer: A portable device for studying slant perception. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 363-371. doi: 10. 3758/s13428-010-0047-7.
9. Norman, J. F., Crabtree, C. E., Bartholomew, A. N., & Ferrell, E. L. (2009). Aging and the perception of slant from optical texture, motion parallax, and binocular disparity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 116-130. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 71. 1. 116.
10. Rieser, J. J., Pick, H. L., Jr., Ashmead, D. H., & Garing, A. E. (1995). Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 21, 480-497. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 21. 3. 480.
11. Sahm, C. S., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Thompson, W. B., & Willemsen, P. (2005). Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in similar real and virtual environments. ACM: Transactions on Applied Perception, 2, 35-45.
12. Stevenson, H. W., & Allen, S. (1964). Adult performance as a function of sex of experimenter and sex of subject. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 214-216.
13. Thomson, J. A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 9, 427-443.
14. Woods, A. J., Philbeck, J. W., & Danoff, J. V. (2009). The various perceptions of distance: An alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1104-1117.