Technology Helps, People Make: A Smart City Governance Framework Grounded in Deliberative Democracy

Public Administration and Information Technology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2016, Pages 333-347

  Garcia Alonso, Roberto ^a   Lippez De Castro, Sebastian ^a  

^a NONE   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Framework; Governance; Habermasian model; People and communities; Smart city; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991815486     PISSN: 25121812     EISSN: 25121839     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_18     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Al-Dalou, R., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2013). E-participation levels and technologies. The 6th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT 2013), Amman, Jordan, 8–10 May (pp. 1–8). http://sce.zuj.edu.jo/icit13/images/Camera%20Ready/E-Technology/656.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
2. Alexander, C. (Ed.). (1998). Digital democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bessette, J. M. (1980). Deliberative democracy: The majority principle in republican government. In R. Goldwin & W. Schambra (Eds.), How democratic is the constitution? Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
4. Bohman, J. (2006). Deliberative democracy and the epistemic benefits of diversity. Episteme, 3(3), 175–190.
5. Bohman, J. (2007). Political communication and the epistemic value of diversity: Deliberation and legitimation in media societies. Communication Theory, 17(4), 348–355.
6. Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.). (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7. Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2003). Dicing with deception: People with disabilities’ strategies for managing safety and identity online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(2). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00209.x.
8. Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2004). Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives. System Sciences. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on IEEE (p. 10). http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/05/205650119c.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
9. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. System Science (HICSS). 45th Hawaii International Conference on IEEE (pp. 2289–2297). http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2012/4525/00/4525c289.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
10. Christiano, T. (1996). The rule of the many. Colorado: Westview Press.
11. Clarke, M., & Stewart, J. (1998). Community governance, community leadership and the new local government. YPS for the Joseph Rowntree foundation. http://www.jrf.org.uk/system/files/lgr119.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
12. Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and smart communities a social learning challenge. Social Science Computer Review, 19(1), 80–93.
13. Davies, J., & Imbroscio, D. (2009). Theories of urban governance. London: Sage.
14. Denters, B., & Rose, L. E. (2005). Comparing local governance—Trends and developments. New York: Taylor and Francis.
15. Department of Innovation, Industry and Regional Development, State Government of Victoria, Australia. (2009). Web 2.0: The new tools for democratic conversations—A snapshot of initiatives in government. http://www.egov.vic.gov.au/. Accessed 29 July 2014.
16. Edwards, A. R. (2002). The moderator as an emerging democratic intermediary: The role of the moderator in Internet discussions about public issues. Information Polity, 7(1), 3–20.
17. Elster, J. (Ed.). (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. European Commission. (2009). Public services 2.0: The impact of social computing on public services. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC54203.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
19. Fishkin, J., & Laslett, R. (2003). Debating deliberative democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Foster, S. P. (2000). The digital divide: Some reflections. International Information and Library Review, 23, 437–451.
21. Giffinger, R., Kramar, H., & Haindl, G. (2007). The role of rankings in growing city competition. Proceedings of the 11th European Urban Research Association (EURA) Conference, Milan, Italy, October 9–11. http://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/PubDat_167218.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
22. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
23. Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
24. Habermas, J. (1998). Facticidad y validez. Madrid: Trotta.
25. Habermas, J. (2003). Truth and justification. Cambridge: MIT Press.
26. Habermas, J. (2005a). Between naturalism and religion. Malden: Polity Press.
27. Habermas, J. (2005b). Concluding comments on empirical approaches to deliberative politics. Acta Política, 40, 384–392.
28. Hacker, K. L., & van Dijk, J. (Eds.). (2000). Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice. London: Sage.
29. Hall, R. E. (2000). The vision of a smart city. Proceedings of the 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop, Paris, France, September 28. http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/773961oyxp82/webviewable/773961.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
30. Hambleton, R., & Gross, J. (2007). Governing cities in a global era. Urban innovation, competition and democratic reform. London: Palgrave.
31. Harding, A. (1995). Elite theory and growth machines. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics. London: Sage.
32. Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., & Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for smarter cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(4), 1–16.
33. Hoff, J., Horrocks, I., & Tops, P. (2000). Democratic governance and new technology: Technologically mediated innovations in political practice in Western Europe. London: Routledge.
34. Holden, S. H., Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level: Progress to date and future issues. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(4), 325–344.
35. Holzer, M., Melitski, J., Rho, S., & Schwester, R. (2004). Restoring trust in government: The potential of digital citizen participation. E-Government Series, IBM Center for The Business of Government. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/HolzerReport.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
36. Internet Content Syndication Council. (2008). Content creation and distribution in an expanding Internet universe: A white paper. http://internetsyndication.org. Accessed 29 July 2014.
37. Johnston, E. W., & Hansen, D. L. (2011). Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures. American Governance, 3, 197–212.
38. Judge, D., Stoker, G., & Wolman, H. (1995). Urban politics and theory. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 1–12). London: Sage.
39. Kamarck, E. C., & Nye, J. S. (Eds.). (2002). Governance.com: Democracy in the Information Age. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
40. Kersting, N., & Vetter, A. (Eds.). (2003). Reforming local government in Europe: Closing the gap between democracy and efficiency. Opladen: Springer DE, VS Verlag für Sozialwissen-schaften, Leske + Budrich.
41. Kim, M. K., & Jee, K. Y. (2006). Characteristics of individuals influencing adoption intentions for portable Internet service. ETRI Journal, 28(1), 67–76.
42. Klijn, E. H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe. An assessment of ten years of research on the theme. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505–525.
43. Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993). Modern governance: New government-society interactions. London: Sage.
44. Komninos, N., Pallot, M., & Schaffers, H. (2013). Special issue on smart cities and the future internet in europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 119–134. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s13132-012-0083-x.
45. Lynn, L. E., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2000). Studying governance and public management: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 233– 262.
46. Mooij, J. (2003). Smart governance? Politics in the policy process in Andhra Pradesh, India. (Working Paper 228). London: Overseas Development Institute. http://www.odi.org/sites/odi. org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/2464.pdf.
47. Mossberger, K., & Jimenez, B. (2009). Can e-government promote civic engagement? A study of local government websites in Illinois and the US. Institute for Policy and Civic Engagement Research Partnership. http://www.uic.edu/cuppa/ipce/interior/egovtfinalreport2009.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
48. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship. The internet, society, and participation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
49. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (pp. 282–291). Accessed 29 July 2014.
50. Neblo, M. (2005). Thinking through democracy: Between the theory and practice of deliberative politics. Acta Politica, 40(2), 169–181.
51. Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. OECD. (2001). Citizens as partners. Information, consultation, and public participation in policy making. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/4201131e.pdf?expir es=1435076834&id=id&accname=id15861&checksum=2B2313630BEA54DF1FD511B4E5 5792A3.
53. Osborne, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2002). The new public management in context. In K. McLaughlin, S. Osborne, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management. Current trends and future prospects (pp. 7–14). London: Routledge.
54. Pierre, J. (1999). Models of urban governance—The institutional dimension of urban politics, Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 372–396.
55. Pierre, J. (2000). Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Polat, R. K., & Pratchett, L. (2009). E-citizenship: Reconstructing the public online. Changing local governance, changing citizens. doi:10.1332/policypress/9781847422170003.0011. Accessed 29 July 2014.
57. Prats, J. (2003). El concepto y el análisis de la gobernabilidad. Revista Instituciones y Desarrollo, 14–15, 239–269.
58. Putnam, R. D. (Ed.). (2002). Democracies in flux. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
60. Rubaii-Barrett, N., & Wise, L. R. (2006). Language minorities and the digital divide: A study of state e-government accessibility. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 12(2), 5–27.
61. Rubaii-Barrett, N., & Wise, L. R. (2008). Disability access and e-government an empirical analysis of state practices. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 19(1), 52–64.
62. Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281. http://search.proquest.com/docview/208315275?accountid=1325.
63. Toppeta, D. (2010). The smart city vision: How innovation and ICT can build smart, “Livable”, sustainable Cities. The Innovation Knowledge Foundation. http://www.thinkinnovation.org/file/research/23/en/Toppeta_Report_005_2010.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
64. Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., & Nelson, L. E. (2010). Helping CIOs understand “Smart City” initiatives: Defining the smart city, its drivers, and the role of the CIO. Cambridge: Forrester Research, Inc. http://public.dhe.ibm.com/partnerworld/pub/smb/smarterplanet/forr_help_cios_und_smart_city_initiatives.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
65. Wiklund, H. (2005). A Habermasian analysis of the deliberative democratic potential of ICT-enabled services in Swedish municipalities. New Media & Society, 7(2), 247–270. Accessed 29 July 2014.