Dicing with deception: People with disabilities' strategies for managing safety and identity online

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2003, Pages

  Bowker, Natilene ^a   Tuffin, Keith ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

DECEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

EID: 2442418095     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00209.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bargh, J. A. (2002). Beyond simple truths: The human-internet interaction. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 1-8.
3. Bargh, J. A., Mckenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation of the 'true self' in the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33-48.
4. Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2002). Disability discourses for online identities. Disability & Society, 17(3), 327-344.
5. Bruckman, A. (1996). Gender swapping on the Internet. In P. Ludlow (Ed.), High noon on the electronic frontier: Conceptual issues in Cyberspace (pp. 317-326). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.
7. Chesher, C. (1997). The ontology of digital domains. In D. Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics: Identity and community in Cyberspace (pp. 79-92). London: Sage.
8. Curtis, P. (1996). Mudding: Social phenomena in text-based virtual realities. In P. Ludlow (Ed.), High noon on the electronic frontier: Conceptual issues in Cyberspace (pp. 347-356). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Davies, B. & Harre, R. (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43-63.
10. Dibbell, J. (1994). A rape in Cyberspace: Or, how an evil clown, a Haitian trickster spirit, two wizards, and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society. In M. Dery (Ed.), Flame wars: The discourse of cyberculture (pp. 237-261). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
11. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
12. Edwards, P. (1990). The army and the microworld: Computers and the politics of gender identity. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 102-128.
13. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
14. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.
15. Foucault, M. (1979). The history of sexuality: Volume 1: An introduction. London: Allen Lane.
16. Frewin, K., & Tuffin, K. (1999). Police status, conformity and internal pressure: A discursive analysis of police culture. Discourse and Society, 9(2), 173-185.
17. Gergen, K. (1985). The social obstructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266-275.
18. Gersch, B. (1998). Gender at the crossroads: The Internet as cultural text. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 23(3), 306-322.
19. Gilbert, G., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientist's discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Harding, S. (1987). Is there a feminist method? In S.Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology: Social science issues (pp. 1-14). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21. Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London: Sage.
22. Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror?: The importance of looks in everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
23. Heim, M. (1991). The erotic ontology of Cyberspace. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First steps (pp. 59-80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Hyde, D., & Todd, R. (1996). An overview of issues surrounding use of the Internet by people with Disabilities. Proceedings of the 18th World Congress of Rehabilitation International, Auckland, New Zealand.
25. Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177-192.
26. Jordan, T. (1999). Cyberpower: The culture and politics of Cyberspace and the Internet. London: Routledge.
27. Kendall, L. (1996). I hardly know'er!: Adventures of a feminist MUDer. In L. Cherny & E. Weize (Eds.), Wired women (pp.207-223). Seattle, WA: Seal Press.
28. McCormick, N. B., & Leonard, J. (1996). Gender and sexuality in the Cyberspace frontier. Women and Therapy, 19(4), 109-119.
29. McLuhan, M. (1987). Understanding media: The extensions of man. London: Ark Paperbacks.
30. McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9-31.
31. Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
32. Perry, R., & Greber, L. (1990). Women and computers: An introduction. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 74-101.
33. Pomeroy, D. (1996, March). My secret life as a women on Internet Relay Chat. New Zealand PC World, 87, 114-115.
34. Poster, M. (1995). Postmodern virtualities. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace I cyberbodies I cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodiment (pp. 79-95). London: Sage.
35. Poster, M. (1997). Cyberdemocracy: The Internet and the public sphere. In D. Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics: Identity and community in Cyberspace (pp. 212 - 228). London: Sage.
36. Potter, J. (1996) Representations of reality. London: Sage.
37. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
38. Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp.164 -201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Roulstone, A. (1998). Researching a disabling society: The case of employment and new technology. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social sciences perspectives (pp. 110-128). Great Britain: Cassell.
40. Serpentelli, J. (1993). Conversational structure and personality correlates of electronic communication. Unpublished paper, Haverford College. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.game.org/pub/mud/text/research/conversation.txt
41. Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., & Wolbert, A. (2002). When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 91-107.
42. Spender, D. (1995). Nattering on the net: Women, power and Cyberspace. Melbourne, Victoria: Spinifex Press.
43. Suler, J. (1999). Do boys just wanna have fun?: Male gender switching in Cyberspace (and how to detect it) (2.5 ed.). [On-line]. Retrieved from http://www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/genderswap.html
44. Tuffin, K. & Howard, C. (2001). Demystifying discourse analysis: Theory, method and practice. In A. McHoul & M. Rapley (Eds.), How to analyse talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods (pp.196-205). London: Continuum International.
45. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. New York: Simon & Schuster.
46. Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of women in Culture and Society, 76(1), 128-157.
47. Turner, S. (1994) Relativism hot and cold. History of the Human Sciences, 7, 109-115.
48. Van Gelder, L. (1991). The strange case of the electronic lover. In C. Dunlop & R. Kling (Eds.), Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (2nd ed., pp. 364-375). Boston: Academic Press.
49. Vasseleu, C. (1997). Virtual bodies/virtual worlds. In D. Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics: Identity and community in Cyberspace (pp. 46-58). London: Sage.
50. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.
51. Wetherell, M. (1995). Romantic discourse and feminist analysis: Interrogating investment, power and desire. In S. Wilkinson & C. Kitzinger (Eds.), Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives (pp. 128-144). London: Sage.
52. Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1988). Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretive repertoires. In C.Antaki (Ed.), analyzing everyday explanation (pp. 168-183). London: Sage.
53. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.