Political communication and the epistemic value of diversity: Deliberation and legitimation in media societies

Communication Theory

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 348-355

  Bohman, James ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMOCRACY; MASS MEDIA;

EID: 35648968682     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: 14682885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00301.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Agarwal, B. (2002). Conceptualizing environmental collective action: Why gender matters. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24, 283-310.
2. Bohman, J. (2003). Deliberative toleration. Political Theory, 31, 757-779.
3. Bohman, J. (2007). Democracy across borders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Druckman, J. (2004). Political preference formation. American Political Science Review, 98, 674-686.
5. Fung, A. (2003). Recipes for public spheres. Journal of Political Philosophy, 3, 338-367.
6. Gigenrenzer, G., & Todd. P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media societies. Communication Theory, 16, 411-426.
8. Hurley, S. (2005). Social heuristics that makes us smarter. Philosophical Psychology, 18, 585-611.
9. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., & Slovic, P. (Eds.). (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Mill, J. S. (1989). On liberty and other writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.