Pre-ozonation for high recovery of nanofiltration (NF) membrane system: Membrane fouling reduction and trace organic compound attenuation

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 523, Issue , 2017, Pages 255-263

  Park, Minkyu ^a   Anumol, Tarun ^a,b   Simon, Julien ^c   Zraick, Flavia ^c   Snyder, Shane A ^a  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

^b AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^c CIRSEE   (France)

Author keywords

Brine; Fouling; Micropollutant; Nanofiltration; Ozone

Indexed keywords

BRINES; FOULING; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OZONE; OZONE WATER TREATMENT; OZONIZATION; SURFACE WATERS; WATER FILTRATION; WATER TREATMENT;

FOULING MECHANISMS; FOULING POTENTIAL; FOULING REDUCTION; LIMITS OF DETECTION; MICROPOLLUTANTS; STATISTICAL CORRELATION; STRONG CORRELATION; TRACE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER; ORGANIC COMPOUND; OZONE; RIVER WATER; SURFACE WATER; TRYPTOPHAN;

ARTICLE; CAKE FILTRATION; CHROMATOPHORE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FILTRATION; FLUORESCENCE; FOULING CONTROL; LIGHT ABSORPTION; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; OXIDATION; OZONATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REDUCTION; WATER SUPPLY; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84991267012     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.051     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. [1] Shannon, M.A., Bohn, P.W., Elimelech, M., Georgiadis, J.G., Mariñas, B.J., Mayes, A.M., Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452 (2008), 301–310.
2. [2] Grant, S.B., Saphores, J.-D., Feldman, D.L., Hamilton, A.J., Fletcher, T.D., Cook, P.L.M., Stewardson, M., Sanders, B.F., Levin, L.A., Ambrose, R.F., Deletic, A., Brown, R., Jiang, S.C., Rosso, D., Cooper, W.J., Marusic, I., Taking the “waste” out of “wastewater” for human water security and ecosystem sustainability. Science 337 (2012), 681–686.
3. [3] Elimelech, M., Phillip, W.A., The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 333 (2011), 712–717.
4. [4] Kimura, K., Amy, G., Drewes, J.E., Heberer, T., Kim, T.-U., Watanabe, Y., Rejection of organic micropollutants (disinfection by-products, endocrine disrupting compounds, and pharmaceutically active compounds) by NF/RO membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 227 (2003), 113–121.
5. [5] Soltanieh, M., Gill, W.N., Review of reverse osmosis membranes and transport models. Chem. Eng. Commun. 12 (1981), 279–363.
6. 2 nanoparticle self-assembled aromatic polyamide Thin-Film-Composite (TFC) membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001), 2388–2394.
7. [7] Wert, E.C., Rosario-Ortiz, F.L., Drury, D.D., Snyder, S.A., Formation of oxidation byproducts from ozonation of wastewater. Water Res. 41 (2007), 1481–1490.
8. [8] Zularisam, A.W., Ismail, A.F., Salim, R., Behaviours of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment — a review. Desalination 194 (2006), 211–231.
9. [9] Heijman, S.G.J., Guo, H., Li, S., van Dijk, J.C., Wessels, L.P., Zero liquid discharge: heading for 99% recovery in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Desalination 236 (2009), 357–362.
10. [10] Greenlee, L.F., Lawler, D.F., Freeman, B.D., Marrot, B., Moulin, P., Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Res. 43 (2009), 2317–2348.
11. [11] Chelme-Ayala, P., Smith, D.W., El-Din, M.G., Membrane concentrate management options: a comprehensive critical review: a paper submitted to the Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 36 (2009), 1107–1119.
12. [12] Florida-Senate, Leah Schad Memorial ocean outfall program, in: 403.08601, 2009.
13. [13] Lawton, G.W., Eggert, C.V., Effect of high sodium chloride concentration on trickling filter slimes. Sew. Ind. Wastes 29 (1957), 1228–1236.
14. [14] Bond, R., Batchelor, B., Davis, T., Klayman, B., Zero liquid discharge desalination of brackish water with an innovative form of electrodialysis: electrodialysis metathesis. Fla. Water Resour. J. 63 (2011), 36–44.
15. [15] A.RobertsonL.Nghiem, Treatment of high TDS liquid waste: is zero liquid discharge feasible?, 2011.
16. [16] Tong, T., Elimelech, M., The global rise of zero liquid discharge for wastewater management: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (2016), 6846–6855.
17. [17] Van Geluwe, S., Vinckier, C., Braeken, L., Van der Bruggen, B., Ozone oxidation of nanofiltration concentrates alleviates membrane fouling in drinking water industry. J. Membr. Sci. 378 (2011), 128–137.
18. [18] Bes-Pía, A., Iborra-Clar, A., Mendoza-Roca, J.A., Iborra-Clar, M.I., Alcaina-Miranda, M.I., Nanofiltration of biologically treated textile effluents using ozone as a pre-treatment. Desalination 167 (2004), 387–392.
19. [19] You, S.-H., Tseng, D.-H., Hsu, W.-C., Effect and mechanism of ultrafiltration membrane fouling removal by ozonation. Desalination 202 (2007), 224–230.
20. [20] Stanford, B.D., Leising, J.F., Bond, R.G., Snyder, S.A., Chapter 11 inland desalination: current practices, environmental implications, and case studies in Las Vegas, NV. Isabel, C.E., Andrea, I.S., (eds.) Sustainability Science and Engineering, 2010, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, UK, 327–350.
21. [21] Stanford, B.D., Pisarenko, A.N., Holbrook, R.D., Snyder, S.A., Preozonation Effects on the Reduction of Reverse Osmosis Membrane Fouling in Water Reuse. Ozone: Sci. Eng. 33 (2011), 379–388.
22. [22] Wetterau, G.D., Chalmers, R.B., Liu, P., Pearce, W., Advancing indirect potable reuse in California. Water Pract. Technol., 8, 2013.
23. [23] Ormerod, K.J., Scott, C.A., Drinking wastewater: public trust in potable reuse. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 38 (2013), 351–373.
24. [24] Rakness, K.L., Wert, E.C., Elovitz, M., Mahoney, S., Operator-friendly technique and quality control considerations for indigo colorimetric measurement of ozone residual. Ozone: Sci. Eng. 32 (2010), 33–42.
25. [25] Kwon, B., Cho, J., Park, N., Pellegrino, J., Organic nanocolloid fouling in UF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 279 (2006), 209–219.
26. [26] J.R. Lakowicz 3rd ed. Principles of fluorescence Spectroscopy 2006 Springer New York, NY, USA.
27. [27] Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J.A., Booksh, K., Fluorescence excitation−emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (2003), 5701–5710.
28. [28] Anumol, T., Snyder, S.A., Rapid analysis of trace organic compounds in water by automated online solid-phase extraction coupled to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta 132 (2015), 77–86.
29. [29] Glater, J., Zachariah, M.R., McCray, S.B., McCutchan, J.W., Reverse osmosis membrane sensitivity to ozone and halogen disinfectants. Desalination 48 (1983), 1–16.
30. [30] Glater, J., Hong, S.-k, Elimelech, M., The search for a chlorine-resistant reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination 95 (1994), 325–345.
31. [31] Buffle, M.-O., Schumacher, J., Salhi, E., Jekel, M., Von Gunten, U., Measurement of the initial phase of ozone decomposition in water and wastewater by means of a continuous quench-flow system: application to disinfection and pharmaceutical oxidation. Water Res. 40 (2006), 1884–1894.
32. [32] Braghetta, A., DiGiano, F., Ball, W., Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: ph and Ionic strength effects. J. Environ. Eng. 123 (1997), 628–641.
33. [33] Listiarini, K., Sun, D.D., Leckie, J.O., Organic fouling of nanofiltration membranes: evaluating the effects of humic acid, calcium, alum coagulant and their combinations on the specific cake resistance. J. Membr. Sci. 332 (2009), 56–62.
34. [34] Schippers, J., Verdouw, J., The modified fouling index, a method of determining the fouling characteristics of water. Desalination 32 (1980), 137–148.
35. [35] Boerlage, S.F.E., Kennedy, M.D., Dickson, M.R., El-Hodali, D.E.Y., Schippers, J.C., The modified fouling index using ultrafiltration membranes (MFI-UF): characterisation, filtration mechanisms and proposed reference membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 197 (2002), 1–21.
36. [36] Song, L., Chen, K.L., Ong, S.L., Ng, W.J., A new normalization method for determination of colloidal fouling potential in membrane processes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 271 (2004), 426–433.
37. [37] Hermia, J., Constant pressure blocking filtration laws-Applications to power-law non-newtonian fluids. Trans. IChemE 60 (1982), 183–187.
38. [38] Lee, S.-J., Dilaver, M., Park, P.-K., Kim, J.-H., Comparative analysis of fouling characteristics of ceramic and polymeric microfiltration membranes using filtration models. J. Membr. Sci. 432 (2013), 97–105.
39. [39] Palacio, L., Ho, C.-C., Zydney, A.L., Application of a pore-blockage—cake-filtration model to protein fouling during microfiltration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 79 (2002), 260–270.
40. [40] Yuan, W., Kocic, A., Zydney, A.L., Analysis of humic acid fouling during microfiltration using a pore blockage-cake filtration model. J. Membr. Sci. 198 (2002), 51–62.
41. [41] Hoek, E.M.V., Elimelech, M., Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (2003), 5581–5588.
42. [42] Świetlik, J., Dąbrowska, A., Raczyk-Stanisławiak, U., Nawrocki, J., Reactivity of natural organic matter fractions with chlorine dioxide and ozone. Water Res. 38 (2004), 547–558.
43. [43] Wert, E.C., Rosario-Ortiz, F.L., Snyder, S.A., Effect of ozone exposure on the oxidation of trace organic contaminants in wastewater. Water Res. 43 (2009), 1005–1014.
44. [44] Hong, S., Elimelech, M., Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 132 (1997), 159–181.
45. [45] de la Rubia, Á., Rodríguez, M., León, V.M., Prats, D., Removal of natural organic matter and THM formation potential by ultra- and nanofiltration of surface water. Water Res. 42 (2008), 714–722.
46. [46] Krieg, H.M., Modise, S.J., Keizer, K., Neomagus, H.W.J.P., Salt rejection in nanofiltration for single and binary salt mixtures in view of sulphate removal. Desalination 171 (2005), 205–215.
47. [47] Wert, E.C., Gonzales, S., Dong, M.M., Rosario-Ortiz, F.L., Evaluation of enhanced coagulation pretreatment to improve ozone oxidation efficiency in wastewater. Water Res. 45 (2011), 5191–5199.
48. [48] Bose, P., Bezbarua, B.K., Reckhow, D.A., Effect Of Ozonation On Some Physical and ChemicalProperties Of Aquatic Natural Organic Matter. Ozone.: Sci. Eng. 16 (1994), 89–112.
49. [49] Jarusutthirak, C., Amy, G., Understanding soluble microbial products (SMP) as a component of effluent organic matter (EfOM). Water Res. 41 (2007), 2787–2793.
50. [50] Westerhoff, P., Aiken, G., Amy, G., Debroux, J., Relationships between the structure of natural organic matter and its reactivity towards molecular ozone and hydroxyl radicals. Water Res. 33 (1999), 2265–2276.
51. [51] Jarusutthirak, C., Amy, G., Role of Soluble Microbial Products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (2006), 969–974.
52. [52] Park, N., Kwon, B., Kim, I.S., Cho, J., Biofouling potential of various NF membranes with respect to bacteria and their soluble microbial products (SMP): characterizations, flux decline, and transport parameters. J. Membr. Sci. 258 (2005), 43–54.
53. [53] Contreras, A.E., Kim, A., Li, Q., Combined fouling of nanofiltration membranes: mechanisms and effect of organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 327 (2009), 87–95.
54. [54] von Gunten, U., Ozonation of drinking water: part I. Oxidation kinetics and product formation. Water Res. 37 (2003), 1443–1467.
55. [55] Gerrity, D., Gamage, S., Jones, D., Korshin, G.V., Lee, Y., Pisarenko, A., Trenholm, R.A., von Gunten, U., Wert, E.C., Snyder, S.A., Development of surrogate correlation models to predict trace organic contaminant oxidation and microbial inactivation during ozonation. Water Res. 46 (2012), 6257–6272.
56. [56] Lee, Y., Gerrity, D., Lee, M., Bogeat, A.E., Salhi, E., Gamage, S., Trenholm, R.A., Wert, E.C., Snyder, S.A., von Gunten, U., Prediction of micropollutant elimination during ozonation of municipal wastewater effluents: use of kinetic and water specific information. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013), 5872–5881.