Similarity relations between groups of notes: Music-theoretical and music-psychological perspectives

Musicae Scientiae

Volumn 13, Issue 1_suppl, 2009, Pages 47-98

  Ockelford, Adam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROEHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cognition; imitation; relationship; repetition; zygonic

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991221975     PISSN: 10298649     EISSN: 20454147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/102986490901300104     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Attneave F., (1950). Dimensions of similarity, American Journal of Psychology, 63(4), 516–56.
2. Babbitt M., (1962). Twelve-tone rhythmic structure and the electronic medium, Perspectives of New Music, 1(1), 49–69.
3. Bernstein L., (1976). The unanswered question, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Borthwick A., (1995). Music theory and analysis: The limitations of logic, New York: Garland.
5. Bregman A. S., (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Chávez C., (1961). Musical Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Coker W., (1972). Music and Meaning: A Theoretical Introduction to Musical Aesthetics, New York: Free Press.
8. Cone E. T., (1987). On derivation: syntax and rhetoric, Music Analysis, 6(3), 237–55.
9. Cook N., (1994). Perception: A perspective from music theory. In Aiello R., and Sloboda J., (eds), Musical Perceptions, pp. 64–95, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Crawford T., Iliopoulos C. S., & Raman R., (1998). String-matching techniques for musical similarity and melodic recognition. In Hewlett W.B., and Selfridge-Field E., (eds), Melodic Similarity Concepts, Procedures and Applications, pp. 73–100, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Cross I., (1998). Music analysis and music perception. Music Analysis, 17(1), 3–20.
12. Deliège I., (2007). Similarity relations in listening to music: How do they come into play?, Musicæ Scientiæ, Discussion Forum 4A, 9–37.
13. DeWitt L. A., & Samuel A. G., (1990). The role of knowledge-based expectations in music perception: Evidence from musical restoration, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119(2), 123–44.
14. Djiovanis S. G., (2005). The oboe works of Benjamin Britten, unpublished DMus treatise, Florida State University, College of Music.
15. Dubiel J., (1999). Composer, theorist, composer/theorist. In Cook N., and Everist M., (eds), Rethinking Music, pp. 262–83, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Fauconnier G., (1985/1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Fiske H. E., (1990). Music and the mind: Philosophical essays on the cognition and meaning of music, Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.
18. Forte A., (1973). The structure of atonal music, New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
19. Forte A., (1983). Motivic design and structural level in the first movement of Brahms's String Quartet in C minor, Musical Quarterly, 69(4), 471–502.
20. Forte A., (1985). Pitch-class set analysis today, Music Analysis, 4(1/2), 29–58.
21. Gjerdingen R. O., (1999). An experimental music theory?. In Cook N., and Everist M., (eds), Rethinking Music, pp. 161–70, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Hiramoto S., (1999). An analysis of Britten's Six Metamophoses after Ovid, The Journal of the International Double Reed Society, 22(2), 23–6.
23. Huron D., (1999/2001). What is a musical feature? Forte's analysis of Brahms's Op. 51, No. 1, revisited Music Theory Online, 7(4).
24. Huron D., (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Isaacson E. J., (1990). Similarity of interval-class content between pitch-class sets: The IcVSIM relation. Journal of Music Theory, 34(1), 1–27.
26. Krumhansl C. L., (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch, New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Kubler G., (1962). The shape of time. New Haven: Yale University Press.
28. Lakoff G., (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Large E. W., (1993). Dynamic programming for the analysis of serial behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25(2), 238–41.
30. LaRue J., (1970). Guidelines for style analysis, New York: Norton.
31. Lerdahl F., (1992). Cognitive constraints on compositional systems. Contemporary Music Review, 6(2), 97–121.
32. Lerdahl F., & Jackendoff R., (1983). A generative theory of tonal music, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Lewin D., (1987). Generalized musical intervals and transformations, New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
34. Medin D. L., Goldstone R. L., & Gentner D., (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100(2), 254–78.
35. Meyer L. B., (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Meyer L. B., (1967). Music, the arts, and ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Meyer L. B., (1973). Explaining music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Moles A., (1958/1966). Information theory and esthetic perception. Urbana: University of Urbana Press.
39. Morris R. D., (1995). Equivalence and similarity in pitch and their interaction with pcset theory. Journal of Music Theory, 39(2), 207–43.
40. Nattiez J.-J., (1990). Music and discourse: Toward a semiology of music (trans. C. Abbate), Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
41. Ockelford A., (1991). The role of repetition in perceived musical structures. In Howell P., West R., and Cross I., (eds), Representing Musical Structure, pp. 129–60, London: Academic Press.
42. Ockelford A., (1993). A theory concerning the cognition of order in music. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of London.
43. Ockelford A., (1999). The cognition of order in music: A metacognitive study, London: Roehampton Institute.
44. Ockelford A., (2002). The magical number two, plus or minus one: Some limits on our capacity for processing musical information. Musicæ Scientiæ, 6, 177–215.
45. Ockelford A., (2004). On similarity, derivation and the cognition of musical structure. Psychology of Music, 32(1), 23–74.
46. Ockelford A., (2005a). Repetition in music: Theoretical and metatheoretical perspectives. London: Ashgate.
47. Ockelford A., (2005b). Musical structure, content and aesthetic response: Beethoven's Op. 110. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 129(2), 112–55.
48. Ockelford A., (2006a). Implication and expectation in music: a zygonic model. Psychology of Music, 34(1), 81–142.
49. Ockelford A., (2006b). Using a music-theoretical approach to interrogate musical development and social interaction. In Lerner N., and Straus J., (eds), Sounding off: theorizing disability in music, pp. 137–55. New York: Routledge.
50. Ockelford A., (2007). Exploring musical interaction between a teacher and pupil, and her evolving musicality, using a music-theoretical approach. Research Studies in Music Education, 28, 3–23.
51. Ockelford A., (2008a). Music for children and young people with complex needs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Ockelford A., (2008b). Beyond music psychology. In Hallam S., Cross I., and Thaut M., (eds), pp. 539–51, Oxford handbook of music psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Ockelford A., & Pring L., (2005). Children with septo-optic dysplasia — musical interests, abilities and provision: The results of a parental survey. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 23(2), 58–66.
54. Palmer C., & van de Sande C., (1993). Units of knowledge in music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19(2), 457–70.
55. Proctor R., & Dutta A., (1995). Skill acquisition and human performance. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
56. Rahn J., (1980). Basic atonal theory. New York: Longman.
57. Reber A., (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(3), 219–35.
58. Repp B.H., (1996). The art of inaccuracy: Why pianists’ errors are difficult to hear. Music Perception, 14(2), 161–83.
59. Repp B., (1997). The aesthetic quality of a quantitatively average music performance: two preliminary experiments. Music Perception, 14(4), 419–44.
60. Ræti R., (1951). The thematic process in music. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
61. Roskies A. L., (1999). The binding problem. Neuron, 24, 7–9.
62. Ruwet N., (1966/1987). Methods of analysis in musicology (trans. M. Everist). Music Analysis 6(1/2), 3–36.
63. Schenker H., (1935/1979). Free composition, rev., 1956 (ed. Jonas O., tran Oster s. E), New York: Longman.
64. Schoenberg A., (1911/1978). Theory of harmony (trans. R.E. Carter). London: Faber and Faber.
65. Schoenberg A., (1967). Fundamentals of musical composition. London: Faber and Faber.
66. de Selincourt B., (1958). Music and duration. Music and Letters 1, 286-93. In Langer S.K., (ed), Reflections on Art, pp. 152–60. London: Oxford University Press.
67. Serafine M. L., (1983). Cognition in music. Cognition, 14, 119–83.
68. Sessions R., (1950). The musical experience of composer, performer and listener. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
69. Shepard R. N., (1982). Structural representations of musical pitch. In Deutsch D., (ed), The psychology of music, pp. 343–90. New York: Academic Press.
70. Slawson W., (1985). Sound color. Berkeley: University of California Press.
71. Solie A., (1982). Melody and the historiography of music. Journal of the History of Ideas, 43(2), 297–308.
72. Spaethling R., (2000). Mozart's letters, Mozart's life. New York: Norton.
73. Stravinsky I., (1942). Poetics of music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74. Sun R., (2002). Duality of the mind. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75. Temperley D., (1995). Motivic perception and modularity. Music Perception, 13(2), 141–69.
76. Toiviainen P., (2007). Editorial. Musicæ Scientiæ, Discussion Forum 4A, 3-5.
77. Tovey D. F., (1935). Essays in musical analysis, Volume I: Symphonies. London: Oxford University Press.
78. Warren J. D., Uppenkamp S., Patterson R. D., & Griffiths T. D., (2003). Separating pitch chroma and pitch height in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(17), 10,038–10,042.
79. Wolpert R. S., (1990). Recognition of melody, harmonic accompaniment, and instrumentation: Musicians vs. nonmusicians. Music Perception, 8(1), 95–106.
80. Zbikowski L. M., (2002). Conceptualizing music: Cognitive structure, theory, and analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
81. Zuckerkandl V., (1956). Sound and symbol: Music and the external world. New York: Pantheon Books.