Similarity perception as a cognitive tool for musical sense-making: Deictic and ecological claims

Musicae Scientiae

Volumn 13, Issue 1_suppl, 2009, Pages 99-118

  Reybrouck, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

cognitive economy; deixis; ecological perception; event perception; similarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991206845     PISSN: 10298649     EISSN: 20454147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/102986490901300105     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bartlett J., (1984). Cognition of complex events: visual scenes and music. In Crozier W., & Chapman A., (eds). Cognitive processes in the perception of art (pp. 225–51). Amsterdam - New York - Oxford: North-Holland.
2. Bransford J., & McCarrell N., (1977). A sletch of a cognitive approach to comprehension: some thought about understanding what it means to comprehend. In Johnson-Laird P., & Wason P., Thinking. Readings in cognitive science (pp. 377–99). Cambridge - London - New York - Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bregman A., (1981). Asking the “what for” question in auditory perception. In Kubovy M., & Pomerantz J., (eds). Perceptual organization (pp. 99–118), Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
4. Bregman A., (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound London, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bruner J., (1983). Child's talk. Learning to use language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Bühler K., (1934). Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfnktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.
7. Bühler K., (1982). The deictic field of language and deictic words (Transl.). In Jarvella R., & Klein W., (eds). Speech, place, and action. Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 9–30). Chichester — New York: John Wiley.
8. Cambouropoulos E., (2001). Melodic cue abstraction, similarity, and category formation. Music Perception, 18, 3, 347–70.
9. Cariani P., (2003). Cybernetic systems and the semiotics of translation. In Petrilli S., (ed). Translation Translation (pp. 349–67). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
10. Clark E., (1978). From gesture to word: On the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. In Bruner J., & Garton A., (eds). Human growth and development (pp. 85–120). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Deliège I., (1995). Cue-abstraction and schematization of the musical form. Scientific Contributions to General Psychology, 14, 11–28.
12. Deliège I., (2001a). Introduction: Similarity perception ↔ Categorization ↔ Cue abstraction. Music Perception, 18, 3, 233–43.
13. Deliège I., (2001b). Prototype effects in music listening: An empirical approach to the notion of imprint. Music Perception, 18, 3, 371–407.
14. Deliège I., (2007). Similarity relations in listening to music: How do they come into play? Musicæ Scientiæ. Discussion Forum 4A, 9–29.
15. Downie J., (2003). Music information retrieval. In Cronin B., Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37 (pp. 295–340). Medford, NJ: Information Today Books.
16. Edelman G., (1989). The remembered present. A biological theory of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
17. Ehlich K., (1982). Anaphora and Deixis: Same, similar, or different? In Jarvella R. J., & Klein W., (eds). Speech, place and action. Studies in Deixis and related topics (pp. 315–38). Chichester - New York - Brisbane - Toronto - Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Engelkamp J., (1981). Experimentelle Psychosemiotik: Wahrnehmung — Vorstellung — Begriff. Zeitschrift für Semiotik, 289–333.
19. Fillmore Ch., (1972). Ansätze zu einer Theorie der Deixis. In Kiefer F., (ed), Semantik und generative Grammatik. I (pp. 147–74). Frankfurt/M: Athenäum Verlag.
20. Fillmore Ch., (1982). Towards a descriptive framework for spatial Deixis. In Jarvella R., & Klein W., (eds). Speech, place, and action. Studies in Deixis and related topics (pp. 31–59). Chichester - New York: John Wiley.
21. Gaver W., (1993). What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5(1), 1–29.
22. Gibson J., (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. London: Allen & Unwin.
23. Gibson J., (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston - Dallas - Geneva - Illinois - Hopewell - New Jersey - Palo Alto - London: Houghton Mifflin Company.
24. Godøy R. I., (1997). Formalization and epistemology. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
25. Handel S., (1989). Listening. An introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA - London: MIT Press.
26. Jackendoff R., (1987). Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge, MA - London: MIT Press.
27. Kita S., (2003). Pointing. Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah (N.J.): Erlbaum.
28. Kurodi S.-Y., (1976). Subject. In Shibatani M., (ed). Syntax and semantics, Vol. 5. Japanese Generative Grammar (p. 5). New York - San Francisco - London: Academic Press.
29. Lamont A., & Dibben N., (2001). Motivic structure and the perception of similarity. Music Perception, 18, 3, 245–74.
30. Langacker R., (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Lerdahl F., (1988). Cognitive constraints on compositional systems. In Sloboda J., (ed), Generative processes in music (pp. 231–59). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32. Levelt W., (1974). Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics. Vol. II, Applications in Linguistic Theory. The Hague - Paris: Mouton.
33. Lyons J., (1982). Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Jarvella R., & Klein W., (eds). Speech, place, and action. Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 101–24). Chichester - New York: John Wiley.
34. Marr D., (1982). Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Freeman.
35. Medin D., & Schaffer M., (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–38.
36. Michaels C., & Carello C., (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs: New Jersey Prentice-Hall.
37. Miller G., (2000). Evolution of human music through sexual selection. In Wallin N. L., Merker B., and Brown S., (eds). The origins of music (pp. 329–60). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Müller M., (2007). Information retrieval for music and motion. Berlin - Heidelberg - New York: Springer.
39. Nosofsky R., (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 700–08.
40. Peirce C., (1960). Elements of logic. In Hartshorne C., & Weiss P., (eds), Collected papers of Ch. S. Peirce. Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Piaget J., (1936). La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant. Geneva: Delachaux et Niestlæ.
42. Piaget J., (1937). La construction du ræel chez l'enfant. Geneva: Delachaux et Niestlæ.
43. Pomerantz J. R., (1986). Visual form perception: An overview. In Schwab E., & Nusbaum H., (eds). Pattern recognition by humans and machines: Visual perception (Vol. 2, pp. 1–30). Orlando, FL: Academic.
44. Reti R., (1961). The thematic process in music. London: Faber & Faber.
45. Reybrouck M., (2001). Biological roots of musical epistemology: Functional cycles, Umwelt, and enactive listening. Semiotica, 134, 1-4, 599–633.
46. Reybrouck M., (2004). Music cognition, semiotics and the experience of time. Ontosemantical and epistemologic claims. Journal of New Music Research, 33, 4, 411–28.
47. Reybrouck M., (2005a). A biosemiotic and ecological approach to music cognition: Event perception between auditory listening and cognitive economy. Axiomathes. An International Journal in Ontology and Cognitive Systems, 15, 2, 229–66.
48. Reybrouck M., (2005b). Body, mind and music: musical semantics between experiential cognition and cognitive economy. Trans, 9
49. Reybrouck M., (2006). Musical creativity between symbolic modelling and perceptual constraints: the role of adaptive behaviour and epistemic autonomy. In Deliège I., & Wiggins G., (eds). Musical creativity: Multidisciplinary research in theory and practice (pp. 42–59). Hove: Psychology Press.
50. Reybrouck M., (2008). The musical code between nature and nurture. In Barbieri M., (ed). The codes of life: The rules of macroevolution (pp. 395–434). Springer: Dordrecht.
51. Rosenthal D., & Okuno H., (1998). Computational auditory scene analysis. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.
52. Ruwet N., (1972). Langage, musique, poæsie. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
53. Shaw R., Flascher O., & Mace W., (1996). Dimensions of event perception. In Prinz W., & Bridgeman B., Handbook of perception and action. Volume 1: Perception (pp. 345–95). London - San Diego - New York - Boston - Sydney - Tokyo - Toronto: Academic Press, Harcourt Brace.
54. Shaw R., & Hazelett W., (1986). Schemas in cognition. In McCabe V., & Balzano G., Event cognition: An ecological perspective (pp. 45–58). Hillsdale (NJ) - London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Shaw R., & Pittenger J., (1978). Perceiving change. In Pick H.L., & Salzman E., (ed). Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 187–204). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
56. Shepard R., (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, Vol. 91 (4), 417–47.
57. Trehub S., (2003). Musical predispositions in infancy: An update. In Peretz I., & Zatorre R., (eds). The cognitive neuroscience of music (pp. 3–20). Oxford - New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Tversky A., (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–52.
59. Wang D., & Brown G., (eds) (2006). Computational auditory scene analysis: Principles, algorithms, and applications. Hoboken (NJ): IEEE Press/Wiley-Interscience.
60. Weiss P., (1971). Hierarchically organized systems in theory and practice. New York: Hafner.
61. Whitehead A., & Russell B., (1968). Principia mathematica, Vol. I. Cambridge: University Press.
62. Wiggins G., (2007). Models of musical similarity. Musicæ Scientiæ, Discussion Forum 4A, 315–37.
63. Wittmann M., (1999). Time perception and temporal processing levels of the brain. Chronobiology International, 16, 17–32.
64. Wittmann M., & Pöppel E., (1999-2000). Temporal mechanisms of the brain as fundamentals of communication — with special reference to music perception and performance. Musicæ Scientiæ, Special Issue, 13–28.
65. Ziv N., & Eitan Z., (2007). Themes as prototypes: Similarity judgments and categorization tasks in musical contexts. Musicæ Scientiæ. Discussion Forum 4A, 3–6, 99-133.