Melodic cue abstraction, similarity, and category formation: A formal model

Music Perception

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 347-370

  Cambouropoulos, Emilios ^a  

^a AUSTRIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002748915     PISSN: 07307829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2001.18.3.347     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Beckner, M. (1959). The biological way of thought. New York: Columbia University Press.
3. Black, M. (1952). The identity of indiscernibles. Mind, 61, 153-164.
4. Cambouropoulos, E. (1997). Musical rhythm: Inferring accentuation and metrical structure from grouping structure. In M. Leman (Ed.), Music, gestalt and computing: Studies in systematic and cognitive musicology (pp. 277-293). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
5. Cambouropoulos, E. (1998a). Towards a general computational theory of musical structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
6. Cambouropoulos, E. (1998b). Musical parallelism and melodic segmentation. In A. Argentini & C. Mirolo (Eds.), Proceedings of the XII Colloquium on Musical Informatics. Venice, Italy: Associazione di Informatica Musicale Italiana.
7. Cambouropoulos, E., Smaill, A., & Widmer, G. (1999). A clustering algorithm for melodic analysis. In H. G. Feichtinger & M. Dörfler (Eds.), Proceedings of the Diderot'99 Forum on Mathematics and Music (pp. 21-28). Vienna, Austria: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft.
8. Cambouropoulos, E., & Widmer, G. (2000). Automated motivic analysis via melodic clustering. Journal of New Music Research, 29(4) (forthcoming).
9. Cambouropoulos, E., Crawford, T., & Iliopoulos, C. S. (2001). Pattern processing in melodic sequences: Challenges, caveats and prospects. Computers and the Humanities, 35(1) (forthcoming).
10. Carterette, E. C., Hohl, D. V., & Pitt, M. A. (1986). Similarities among transformed melodies: The abstraction of invariants. Music Perception, 3, 393-410.
11. Deliège, I. (1996). Cue abstraction as a component of categorisation processes in music listening. Psychology of Music, 24, 131-156.
12. Deliège, I. (1997). Similarity in processes of categorisation: Imprint formation as a prototype effect in music listening. In M. Ramscar, U. Hahn, E. Cambouropoulos, & H. Pain (Eds.), Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Similarity and Categorisation (pp. 59-65). Edinburgh, U. K.: Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh.
13. Deliège, I. (2001). Prototype effects in music listening: An empirical approach to the notion of imprint. Music Perception, 18, 371-407.
14. Deliège, I., & Mélen, M. (1997). Cue abstraction in the representation of musical form. In I. Deliège & J. Sloboda (Eds.), Perception and cognition of music (pp. 387-412). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press Ltd.
15. Eerola, T., Järvinen, T., Louhivuori J, & Toiviainen P. (2001). Statistical features and perceived similarity of folk melodies. Music Perception, 18, 275-296.
16. Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Goldstone, R. L., Medin, D. L., & Gentner, D. (1991). Relational similarity and the non-independence of features in similarity judgments. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 222-262.
18. Goodman, N. (1972). Seven strictures on similarity. In Project and problems (pp. 437-446). New York: Bobbs-Merrill Co, Inc.
19. Hampton, J. (1993). Prototype models of concept representation. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. S. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts (pp. 67-95). London: Academic Press.
20. Hampton, J., & Dubois, D. (1993). Psychological models of concepts: Introduction. In I. Van Mechelen et al. (Eds.), Categories and concepts (pp. 11-33). London: Academic Press.
21. Hötheker K., Hörnel D., & Anagnostopoulou C. (2001). Investigating the influence of representations and algorithms in music classification. Computers and the Humanities, 35(1) (forthcoming).
22. Koniari, D., Predazzer S, & Mélen, M. (2001). Categorization and schematization processes used in music perception by 10- to 11-year-old children. Music Perception, 18, 297-324.
23. Krumhansl, C. L. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density. Psychological Review, 85, 445-463.
24. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
25. Lamont, A., & Dibben, N. (1997). Perceived similarity of musical motifs: An exploratory study. In M. Ramscar, U. Hahn, E. Cambouropoulos, & H. Pain (Eds.), Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Similarity and Categorisation (pp. 143-149). Edinburgh, U.K.: Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh.
26. Lamont, A., & Dibben, N. (2001). Motivic structure and the perception of similarity. Music Perception, 18, 245-274.
27. Mechelen, I. V., Hampton, J., Michalski, R. S., & Theuns, P. (1993). Categories and Concepts. London: Academic Press.
28. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278.
29. Mélen, M., & Wachsmann, J. (2001). Categorization of musical motifs in infancy. Music Perception, 18, 325-346.
30. Murphy, G. L. (1993). Theories and concept formation. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. S. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts (pp. 173-200). London: Academic Press.
31. Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
32. Murtagh, F. D. (1993). Cluster analysis using proximities. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. S. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts (pp. 225-245). London: Academic Press.
33. Pollard-Gott, L. (1983). Emergence of thematic concepts in repeated listening to music. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 66-94.
34. Quine, W. V. (1950). Identity, ostension, and hypostasis. The Journal of Philosophy, XLVII, 621-633.
35. Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality and categorisation. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21-59). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
36. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-232.
37. Russell, B. (1949). A critical exposition of the philosophy of Leibniz. London: Bradford and Dickens.
38. Russell, B., & Whitehead, A. N. (1964). Principia mathematica. 2nd ed. London: Allen & Unwin.
39. Shepard, R. N. (1962a). The analysis of proximities: Multi-dimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, part I. Psychometrica, 27, 125-140.
40. Shepard, R. N. (1962b). The analysis of proximities: Multi-dimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, part II. Psychometrica, 27, 219-246.
41. Stroll, A. (1967). Identity. The encyclopedia of philosophy. London: Macmillan Publishing Co.
42. Sutcliffe, J. P. (1993). Concept, class, and category in the tradition of Aristotle. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. S. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts (pp. 35-65). London: Academic Press.
43. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
44. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. London: Macmillan Publishing Co.