Influence of study type on twitter activity for medical research papers

Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 26-36

  Andersen, Jens Peter ^a   Haustein, Stefanie ^b  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

GENERAL PUBLICS; IMPACT INDICATORS; MEDICAL PAPERS; MEDICAL RESEARCH PAPERS; MEDICAL STUDIES; SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE; SCIENTIFIC DOCUMENTS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CLINICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84991108834     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Andersen, J. P. (2013). Conceptualising research quality in medicine for evaluative bibliometrics. University of Copenhagen. Retrieved June 10, 2015 from http://vbn.aau.dk/files/119316655/JensPeterAndersenThesis.pdf
2. Andersen, J. P., & Schneider, J. W. (2011). Influence of study design on the citation patterns of Danish, medical research. In Proceedings of the ISSI 2011 Conference (pp. 46-53).
3. Berger, E. (2009). This sentence easily would fit on Twitter: Emergency physicians are learning to "tweet." Annals of Emergency Medicine, 54(2), A23-A25. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.06.002
4. Calver, M. C., & Bradley, J. S. (2009). Should we use the mean citations per paper to summarise a journal's impact or to rank journals in the same field? Scientometrics, 81(3), 611-615. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2229-y
5. Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., & Wouters, P. (2014). Do "altmetrics" correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1002/asi.23309
6. Eysenbach, G. (2011). Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e123. doi:10.2196/jmir.2012
7. Greenhalgh, T. (2010). How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine (4th ed.). Oxford: BMJ Books.
8. Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., Holmberg, K., Tsou, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated bot accounts on Twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.4139
9. Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: the effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. Submitted to PLOS ONE.
10. Haustein, S., Larivière, V., Thelwall, M., Amyot, D., & Peters, I. (2014). Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? It-Information Technology, 56(5), 207-215. doi:10.1515/itit-2014-1048
11. Haustein, S., Peters, I., Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M., & Larivière, V. (2014). Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 656-669. doi:10.1002/asi.23101
12. Kjaergard, L. L., & Gluud, C. (2002). Citation bias of hepato-biliary randomized clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55(4), 407-10.
13. Martyn, J., & Gilchrist, A. (1968). An Evaluation of British Scientific Journals. London: Aslib.
14. Neylon, C. (2014). Altmetrics: What are they good for? PLOS Opens. Retrieved from http://blogs.plos.org/opens/2014/10/03/altmetrics-what-are-they-good-for/
15. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. (2011). The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
16. Patsopoulos, N. a, Analatos, A. a, & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA : The Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(19), 2362-6. doi:10.1001/jama.293.19.2362
17. Priem, J. (2014). Altmetrics. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: harnessing multidimensional indicators of performance (pp. 263-287). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Priem, J., Piwowar, H. A., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv, 1-17. Digital Libraries. doi:http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745v1
19. Röhrig, B., du Prel, J.-B., Wachtlin, D., & Blettner, M. (2009). Types of study in medical research: part 3 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 106(15), 262-8. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2009.0262
20. Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3), 183-195. doi:10.1087/20110306
21. Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PloS One, 8(5), e64841. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
22. Thelwall, M., Tsou, A., Weingart, S., Holmberg, K., & Haustein, S. (2013). Tweeting links to academic articles. Cybermetrics: International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics, 1-8. Retrieved from http://cybermetrics.cindoc.csic.es/articles/v17i1p1.html
23. Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of "alternative metrics" in scientific publications. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1264-0