Erratum to: Trade, Politics, and the Poor: Is Sen Right and Bhagwati Wrong? (Studies in Comparative International Development, (2017), 52, 1, (1-22), 10.1007/s12116-016-9231-9);Trade, Politics, and the Poor: Is Sen Right and Bhagwati Wrong?

Studies in Comparative International Development

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 1-22

  Rudra, Nita ^a   Tirone, Daniel C ^b  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Health; Income inequality; International political economy; Trade

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING WORLD; HEALTH STATUS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; POLITICAL ECONOMY; POVERTY; TRADE;

EID: 84991070303     PISSN: 00393606     EISSN: 19366167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12116-017-9234-1     Document Type: Erratum

References (69)

1. Acemoglu D, Robinson J. Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business; 2012.
2. Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. Economics versus politics: pitfalls of policy advice. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Working Paper Series; 2013.
3. Aisbett E. Why are the critics so convinced that globalization is bad for the poor? In: Harrison A, editor. Globalization and poverty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2007. p. 33–86.
4. Alesina A, Baqir R, Easterly W. Public goods and ethnic divisions. Q J Econ. 1999;114:1243–84.
5. Alesina A, Devleeschauwer A, Easterly W, Kurlat S, Wacziarg R. Fractionalization. J Econ Growth. 2003;8:155–94.
6. Amiti M, Davis DR. Trade, firms, and wages: theory of evidence. Review of Economic Studies. 2012;79:1–36.
7. Barro RJ, Lee JW. International data on educational attainment: updates and implications. Manuscript: Harvard University; 2000.
8. Baum, C.F., M.E. Schaffer and S. Stillman. Ivreg2: State module for extended instrumental variables /2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML, and k-class regression. Boston College Department of Economics, Statistical Software Components S425401. Downloadable from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s425401.html; 2007.
9. Bell A, Jones K. Explaining fixed effects: random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods. 2015;3:133–53.
10. Bergh, A & Nilsson, T. Globalization and absolute poverty: a panel data study. IFN Working Paper; 2011.
11. Bhagwati J, Panagariya A. Why growth matters: how economic growth in India reduced poverty and the lessons for other developing countries. New York: Public Affair; 2013.
12. Blouin C, Heymann J, Drager N, editors. Negotiating across boundaries: promoting health in a globalized world, vol. 20. Montrreal, CA: McGill-Queens UP; 2007.
13. Brambor T, Clark WR, Golder M. Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Polit Anal. 2006;14:63–82.
14. Bussmann M. The effect of trade openness on women’s welfare and work life. World Dev. 2009;37:1027–38.
15. Caldwell JC. Education as a factor in mortality decline: an examination of Nigerian data. Popul Stud. 1979;33:395–413.
16. Castilho M, Menéndez M, Sztulman A. Trade liberalization, inequality, and poverty in Brazilian states. World Dev. 2012;40:821–35.
17. Chandra R. Trade in health services. Bulletin of world health. Organization. 2002;80:158–63.
18. Cornia GA. Globalization and health: results and options. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:83.
19. Davis DR, Mishra P. Stolper-Samuelson is dead: and other crimes of both theory and data. In: Harrison A, editor. Globalization and poverty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2007. p. 87–108.
20. Deininger KW, Squire LA. New data set measuring income inequality. The. World Bank Econ Rev. 1996;10:565–91.
21. Dollar D, Kraay A. Trade, growth, and poverty. Econ J. 2004;114:F22–49.
22. Dreze J, Sen A. An uncertain glory: India and its contradictions. Princeton UP: Princeton; 2013.
23. Easterly W. Inequality does cause underdevelopment: insights from a new instrument. J Dev Econ. 2007;84:755–76.
24. Easterly W, Ritzan J, Woolcock M. Social cohesion, institutions, and growth. Econ Polit. 2006;18:103–20.
25. Engerman, S. L. and Sokoloff, K. L Factor endowments, inequality, and paths of development among new world economies. NBER Working Paper. 2002;9259.
26. Figini P, Santarelli E. Openness, economic reforms, and poverty: globalization in developing countries. The Journal of Developing Areas. 2006;39:129–51.
27. Filmer D, Hammer JS, Pritchett LH. Weak links in the chain: a diagnosis of health policy in poor countries. The World Bank Research Observer. 2000;15:99–224.
28. Fukuda-Parr S, Lawson-Remer T, Randolph S. An index of economic and social rights fulfillment: concept and methodology. Journal of Human Rights. 2009;8:195–221.
29. Goldberg PK, Pavcnik N. The response of the informal sector to trade liberalization. J Dev Econ. 2003;72:463–96.
30. Goldberg, P. K., & Pavcnik, N. Trade, inequality, and poverty: what do we know? Evidence from recent trade liberalization episodes in developing countries (No. w10593). Natl Bur Econ Res; 2004.
31. Harrison, A. Globalization and poverty. No. w12347. Natl Bur Econ Res; 2006.
32. Harrison A, Hanson G. Who gains from trade reform? Some remaining puzzles. J Dev Econ. 1999;59:25–154.
33. Hasan R, Mitra D, Ural BP. Trade liberalization, labor-market institutions and poverty reduction: evidence from Indian states. In India Policy Forum. 2007;3:71–122.
34. Heston, A, Summers, R. and Allen, B. Penn World Table Version 7.1, Center for international comparisons of production, income and prices at the University of Pennsylvania; 2012.
35. Hobcraft J. Women’s education, child welfare, and child survival: a review of the evidence. Health Transition Review. 1993;3:159–75.
36. Hoekman, B. and Winters, A. H. Trade and employment: stylized facts and research findings. World Bank Publications; 2005.
37. Jamison E, Jamison D, Hanushek E. The effects of education quality on income growth and mortality decline. Econ Educ Rev. 2007;26:771–88.
38. Kovak, B. Overestimating the effect of complementarity on skill demand. B.E. J Econ Anal Policy. 2011;11.
39. Lake DA, Baum MA. The invisible hand of democracy political control and the provision of public services. Comparative Political Studies. 2001;34:587–621.
40. Leung CS, Meisen P. How electricity consumption affects social and economic development by comparing low, medium and high human development countries. GENI: San Diego, CA; 2005.
41. Levine DI, Rothman D. Does trade affect child health? J Health Econ. 2006;25:538–54.
42. MacDonald, R. and Majeed, M.T. Distributional and poverty consequences of globalization: a dynamic comparative analysis for developing countries; 2010.
43. Maertens, M, Liesbeth, C., and Swinnen, J. F. M. Globalisation and poverty in Senegal: a worst case scenario? Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2011;jbq053.
44. Marshall, M. G. & Jaggers, K. Polity IV Data Set. [Computer file] College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland; 2002. Available from http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/polity/data/
45. Martens P, Akin SM, Maud H, Mohsin R. Is globalization healthy: a statistical indicator analysis of the impacts of globalization on health. Glob Health. 2010;6.
46. McGuire, J. W.Wealth, health, and democracy in East Asia and Latin America. Cambridge University Press; 2010.
47. Mukherjee N, Kriekhaus J. Globalization and human wellbeing. International Political Science Review. 2011;33:150–70.
48. North DC, Wallis JJ, Weingast BR. Violence and social orders. Cambridge: Cambridge UP; 2013.
49. Nussbaum M, Sen A. The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford UP; 1993.
50. Owen, A. L. & Wu, S. Is trade good for your health? Review of International Economics. 2007;15:660–682.
51. Payne JE. A survey of the electricity consumption-growth literature. Appl Energy. 2010;87:723–31.
52. Perotti R. Political equilibrium, income distribution, and growth. Review of Economic Studies. 1993;60:755–76.
53. Perotti R. Growth, income distribution, and democracy: what the data say. J Econ Growth. 1996;1:149–87.
54. Piketty T. About capital in the twenty-first century. Am Econ Rev. 2015;105:48–53.
55. Porto GG. Using survey data to assess the distributional effects of trade policy. J Int Econ. 2006;70:140–60.
56. Randolph S, Fukuda-Parr S, Lawson-Remer T. Economic and social rights fulfillment index: country scores and rankings. Journal of Human Rights. 2001;9:230–61.
57. Rodriguez, F., & Rodrik, D. Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to cross-national evidence. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual. MIT Press. 2001;15:261–338.
58. Rodrik D. Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflict, and growth collapses. J Econ Growth. 1999;4:385–412.
59. Roeder, P.G. Ethnolinguistic fractionalization (ELF) indices, 1961 and 1985. Available from http//:weber.ucsd.edu/-proeder/elf.htm; 2001.
60. Ross M. Is democracy good for the poor? Am J Polit Sci. 2006;50:860–74.
61. Rueda D, Pontusson J. Wage inequality and varieties of capitalism. World Politics. 2000;52:350–83.
62. Savun B, Tirone DC. Foreign aid, democratization and civil conflict: how does democracy aid affect civil conflict? Am J Polit Sci. 2011;55:233–46.
63. Sen A. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford UP; 1999.
64. Smith, R., Blouin, C. and Drager, N. International trade in health services and the GATS. World Bank Group; 2006.
65. Tsai MC. Economic and non-economic determinants of poverty in developing countries: competing theories and empirical evidence. Canadian Journal of Development Studies. 2006;27:267–85.
66. Verhoogen E. Trade, quality upgrading and wage inequality in the Mexican manufacturing sector. Q J Econ. 2008;123:489–530.
67. Waldmann RJ. Income distribution and infant mortality. Q J Econ. 1992;107:1283–302.
68. Wood A. Openness and wage inequality in developing countries: the Latin American challenge to east Asian conventional wisdom. World Economic Review. 1997;11:35–57.
69. World Health Organization. Primary health care: now more than ever. World health report. http://www.who.int/whr/2008/whr08_en.pdf ; 2008.