Effects of personality disorders on self-other agreement and favorableness in personality descriptions

Journal of Personality Disorders

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 576-594

  Tandler, Nancy ^a   Mosch, Alice ^a   Wolf, Annegret ^a   Borkenau, Peter ^a  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PEER GROUP; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PERSONALITY TEST; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT; STUDENT;

ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PEER GROUP; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; STUDENTS;

EID: 84990990285     PISSN: 0885579X     EISSN: 19432763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_213     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518-529. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.518
2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4. Asendorpf, J. B., & Ostendorf, F. (1998). Is selfenhancement healthy? Conceptual, psychometric, and empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 955-966. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.955
5. Biesanz, J. S. (2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 853-885. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2010 .519262
6. Borkenau, P., & Zaltauskas, K. (2009). Effects of self-enhancement on agreement on personality profiles. European Journal of Personality, 23, 107-123. doi: 10.1002/per.707
7. Clifton, A., Turkheimer, E., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2004). Contrasting perspectives on personality problems: Descriptions from the self and others. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1499-1514. doi: 10.1016/j. paid.2003.06.002
8. Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on "understanding of others" and "assumed similarity." Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193. doi: 10.1037/h0044919
9. Edwards, A. L. (1953). The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 90-93. doi: 10.1037/h0058073
10. Fiedler, P. (2000). Integrative Psychotherapie bei Persönlichkeitsstörungen [Integrative psychotherapy of personality disorders]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
11. First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Benjamin, L. S. (1997). User’s guide for structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders (SCID-II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
12. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77-83. doi: 10.1016/j. tics.2006.11.005
13. Furr, R. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267-1316. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521.x
14. Gallrein, A.-M. B., Carlson, E. N., Holstein, M., & Leising, D. (2013). You spy with your little eye: People are "blind" to some of the ways in which they are consensually seen by others. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.001
15. Human, L. J., & Biesanz, J. C. (2011). Through the looking glass clearly: Accuracy and assumed similarity in well-adjusted individuals’ first impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 349-364. doi: 10.1037/a0021850
16. Human, L. J., Biesanz, J. C., Finseth, S. M., Pierce, B., & Le, M. (2014). To thine own self be true: Psychological adjustment promotes judgeability via person-behavior congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 286-303. doi: 10.1037/a0034860
17. Ickes, W., & Simpson, J. A. (1997). Managing empathic accuracy in close relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 218-250). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19. King, A. R., & Pate, A. N. (2003). MCMI-II predictors of judgmental tendencies as measured by the first impression interaction procedure. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 327-337. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00193-9
20. Klonsky, E. D., Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2002). Informant-reports of personality disorder: Relation to self-reports, and future research directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 300-311. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.9.3.300
21. Leising, D., & Borkenau, P. (2011). Person perception, dispositional inferences, and social judgment. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 157-170). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
22. Lorenzo, G. L., Biesanz, J. C., & Human, L. J. (2010). What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood: Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality. Psychological Science, 21, 1777-1782. doi: 10.1177/0956797610388048
23. Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2011). Personality development across the life span: Longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 847-861. doi: 10.1037/a0024298
24. Lukowitsky, M. R., & Pincus, A. L. (2013). Interpersonal perception of pathological narcissism: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(3), 261-273. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.765881
25. Mahaffey, K. J., & Marcus, D. K. (2006). Interpersonal perception of psychopathy: A social relations analysis. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 53-74. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.1.53
26. Meyer, B., Pilkonis, P. A., & Beevers, C. G. (2004). What’s in a (neutral) face? Personality disorders, attachment styles, and the appraisal of ambiguous social cues. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(4), 320-336.
27. Oltmanns, T. F., Friedman, J. N. W., Fiedler, E. R., & Turkheimer, E. (2004). Perceptions of people with personality disorders based on thin slices of behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 216-229. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00066-7
28. Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur: Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit [Language and personality: On the validity of the Five-Factor model of personality]. Regensburg, Germany: Roderer.
29. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2010). HLM7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
30. Schallberger, U., & Venetz, M. (1999). Kurzversionen des MRS-Inventars von Ostendorf (1990) zur Erfassung der fünf "grossen" Persönlichkeitsfaktoren [Short versions of the MRS Inventory by Ostendorf (1990) to assess the "big" five factors of personality]. Zürich, Switzerland: Universität Zürich, Department of Applied Psychology.
31. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and wellbeing: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
32. Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281-300. doi: 10.1037/a0017908
33. Wittchen, H. U., Zaudig, M., & Fydrich, T. (1997). Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSMIV [Structured Clinical Interview for DSMIV]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.