To thine own self be true: Psychological adjustment promotes judgeability via personality-behavior congruence

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 286-303

  Human, Lauren J ^a   Biesanz, Jeremy C ^a   Finseth, Sonia M ^b   Pierce, Benjamin ^a   Le, Marina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accuracy; First impressions; Judgeability; Personality behavior congruence; Psychological adjustment

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERSONALITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PERSONALITY; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84893137588     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0034860     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Oxford, England: Holt. Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518-529. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3 .518
2. Andersen, S. M. (1984). Self-knowledge and social inference: II. The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 294-307. doi:10.1037/0022-3514 .46.2.294
3. Ayduk, O., Gyurak, A., Akinola, M., & Mendes, W. B. (2013). Consistency over flattery: Self-verification processes revealed in implicit and behavioral responses to feedback. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 538-545. doi:10.1177/1948550612471827
4. Baird, B. M., Le, K., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). On the nature of intraindividual personality variability: Reliability, validity, and associations with well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 512-527. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.512
5. Bates, D., & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package Version 0.9975-12) [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
6. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
7. Bem, D. J., & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 506-520. doi:10.1037/h0037130
8. Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. R. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729-750. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729
9. Biesanz, J. C. (2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 853-885. doi:10.1080/ 00273171.2010.519262
10. Biesanz, J. C., Falk, C. F., & Savalei, V. (2010). Assessing mediational models: Testing and interval estimation for indirect effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 661-701. doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.498292
11. Biesanz, J. C., & Human, L. J. (2010). The cost of forming more accurate impressions: Accuracy-motivated perceivers see the personality of others more distinctively but less normatively than perceivers without an explicit goal. Psychological Science, 21, 589 -594. doi:10.1177/ 0956797610364121
12. Biesanz, J. C., & West, S. G. (2000). Personality coherence: Moderating self-other profile agreement and profile consensus. Journal of Person-ality and Social Psychology, 79, 425-437. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3 .425
13. Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Graziano, W. G. (1998). Moderators of self-other agreement: Reconsidering temporal stability in personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 467-477. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.467
14. Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Millevoi, A. (2007). What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 119 -135. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.119
15. Blackman, M. C., & Funder, D. C. (1998). The effect of information on consensus and accuracy in personality judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 164-181. doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1347
16. Block, J. (1961). Ego-identity, role variability, and adjustment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 392-397. doi:10.1037/h0042979
17. Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599-614. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599
18. Borkenau, P., & Zaltauskas, K. (2009). Effects of self-enhancement on agreement on personality profiles. European Journal of Personality, 23, 107-123. doi:10.1002/per.707
19. Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538-549. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.538
20. Cervone, D., & Shoda, Y. (1999). The coherence of personality: Socialcognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21. Chan, M., Rogers, K. H., Parisotto, K. L., & Biesanz, J. C. (2011). Forming first impressions: The role of gender and normative accuracy in personality perception. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 117-120. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.001
22. Chaplin, W. F., & Goldberg, L. R. (1984). A failure to replicate the Bem and Allen study of individual differences in cross-situational consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1074-1090. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1074
23. Cheek, J. M. (1982). Aggregation, moderator variables, and the validity of personality tests: A peer-rating study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1254-1269. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1254
24. Clifton, A., & Kuper, L. E. (2011). Self-reported personality variability across the social network is associated with interpersonal dysfunction. Journal of Personality, 79, 359-390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010 .00686.x
25. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
26. Colvin, C. R. (1993a). Childhood antecedents of young-adult judgability. Journal of Personality, 61, 611-635. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993 .tb00784.x
27. Colvin, C. R. (1993b). "Judgable" people: Personality, behavior, and competing explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 861-873. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.861
28. Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on "understanding of others" and "assumed similarity". Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193. doi:10.1037/h0044919
29. Cross, S. E., Gore, J. S., & Morris, M. L. (2003). The relationalinterdependent self-construal, self-concept consistency, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 933-944. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.933
30. Diehl, M., & Hay, E. L. (2007). Contextualized self-representations in adulthood. Journal of Personality, 75, 1255-1284. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00475.x
31. Diehl, M., & Hay, E. L. (2010). Risk and resilience factors in coping with daily stress in adulthood: The role of age, self-concept incoherence, and personal control. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1132-1146. doi: 10.1037/a0019937
32. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
33. Donahue, E. M., Robins, R. W., Roberts, B. W., & John, O. P. (1993). Divided we fall: Self-concept differentiation, personality, and psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 834-846. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.834
34. Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York, NY: Dryden.
35. Ekman, P. (1972). Universal and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. R. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1971 (pp. 207-283). Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.
36. Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 89-97. doi:10.1177/0146167285111008
37. English, T., & Chen, S. (2007). Culture and self-concept stability: Consistency across and within contexts among Asian Americans and European Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 478-490. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.478
38. English, T., & Chen, S. (2011). Self-concept consistency and culture: The differential impact of two forms of consistency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 838-849. doi:10.1177/0146167211400621
39. Erickson, T. M., Newman, M. G., & Pincus, A. L. (2009). Predicting unpredictability: Do measures of interpersonal rigidity/flexibility and distress predict intraindividual variability in social perceptions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 893-912. doi:10.1037/a0016515
40. Falk, C. F., & Biesanz, J. C. (2013). Two cross-platform programs for inferences and interval estimation about indirect effects in mediational models. Manuscript submitted for publication.
41. Fleeson, W., & Wilt, J. (2010). The relevance of Big Five trait content in behavior to subjective authenticity: Do high levels of within-person behavioral variability undermine or enable authenticity achievement? Journal of Personality, 78, 1353-1382. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010 .00653.x
42. Friedman, H. S., Riggio, R. E., & Casella, D. F. (1988). Nonverbal skill, personal charisma, and initial attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 203-211. doi:10.1177/0146167288141020
43. Friesen, W. V. (1972). Cultural differences in facial expression in a social situation: An experimental test of the concept of display rules (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Francisco.
44. Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652
45. Funder, D. C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to personality perception. London, England: Academic.
46. Funder, D. C., & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.409
47. Funder, D., Furr, R., & Colvin, C. (2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q-Sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 451-489. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00103
48. Furr, R. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267-1316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521.x
49. Gelman, A. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2865-2873. doi:10.1002/sim.3107 Gesn, P. R., & Ickes, W. (1999). The development of meaning contexts for empathic accuracy: Channel and sequence effects. Journal of Personal-ity and Social Psychology, 77, 746-761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4 .746
50. Hall, J. A. (1979). Gender, gender roles, and nonverbal communication skills. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences (pp. 32-67). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
51. Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 218-227. doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8
52. Human, L. J., & Biesanz, J. C. (2011a). Target adjustment and self-other agreement: Utilizing trait observability to disentangle judgeability and self-knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 202-216. doi:10.1037/a0023782
53. Human, L. J., & Biesanz, J. C. (2011b). Through the looking glass clearly: The role of adjustment in accuracy and assumed similarity in first impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 349-364. doi:10.1037/a0021850
54. Human, L. J., & Biesanz, J. C. (2013). Targeting the good target: An integrative review of the characteristics and consequences of being accurately perceived. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 248-272. doi:10.1177/1088868313495593
55. Human, L. J., Biesanz, J. C., Miller, G. E., Chen, E., Lachman, M. E., & Seeman, T. E. (2013). Is change bad? Personality change is associated with poorer psychological health and greater metabolic syndrome in midlife. Journal of Personality, 81, 249-260. doi:10.1111/jopy.12002
56. Human, L. J., Biesanz, J. C., Parisotto, K. L., & Dunn, E. W. (2012). Your best self reveals your true self: Trying to make a good impression results in more accurate impressions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 23-30. doi:10.1177/1948550611407689
57. Human, L. J., Sandstrom, G. M., Biesanz, J. C., & Dunn, E. W. (2013). Accurate first impressions leave a lasting impression: The long-term effects of accuracy on relationship development. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 395-402. doi:10.1177/1948550612463735
58. Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95-109. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000 .tb00006.x
59. John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521-551. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00781.x
60. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
61. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwartz, N. (1999). Well-being: The foundation for hedonic psychology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219 -233. doi:10.1080/ 17439760802303044
62. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
63. Kenny, D. A., Korchmaros, J. D., & Bolger, N. (2003). Lower level mediation in multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 8, 115-128. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.115
64. Kenrick, D. T., & Stringfield, D. O. (1980). Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. Psychological Review, 87, 88-104. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.1.88
65. Keyes, C. L. M., Schmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007-1022. doi:10.1037/0022-3514 .82.6.1007
66. Klein, K. J. K., & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720 -730. doi:10.1177/ 0146167201276007
67. Lackenbauer, S., Campbell, L., Rubin, H., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Troister, T. (2010). The unique and combined benefits of accuracy and positive bias in relationships. Personal Relationships, 17, 475-493. doi:10.1111/j .1475-6811.2010.01282.x
68. Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280 .1990.tb00079.x
69. Larrance, D. T., & Zuckerman, M. (1981). Facial attractiveness and vocal likeability as determinants of nonverbal sending skills. Journal of Personality, 49, 349-362. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1981.tb00219.x
70. Letzring, T. D. (2008). The good judge of personality: Characteristics, behaviors, and observer accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 914-932. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.12.003
71. Letzring, T. D., Wells, S. M., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Information quantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 111-123. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.111
72. Lorenzo, G. L., Biesanz, J. C., & Human, L. J. (2010). What is beautiful is good and more accurately understood: Physical attractiveness and accuracy in first impressions of personality. Psychological Science, 21, 1777-1782. doi:10.1177/0956797610388048
73. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Grob, A., Suh, E. M., & Shao, L. (2000). Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 452-468. doi: 10.1O37//0022-3514.79.3.452
74. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111-131. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111
75. Marangoni, C., Garcia, S., Ickes, W., & Teng, G. (1995). Empathic accuracy in a clinically relevant setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 854-869. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.854
76. Matsumoto, D. (1990). Cultural similarities and differences in display rules. Motivation and Emotion, 14, 195-214. doi:10.1007/BF00995569
77. Matsumoto, D., & Kupperbusch, C. (2001). Idiocentric and allocentric differences in emotional expression and experience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 113-131. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2001.00080.x
78. McReynolds, P., Altrocchi, J., & House, C. (2000). Self-pluralism: Assessment and relations to adjustment, life changes, and age. Journal of Personality, 68, 347-381. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00100
79. Moskowitz, D. S., & Schwarz, J. C. (1982). Validity comparison of behavior counts and ratings by knowledgeable informants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 518-528. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.3.518
80. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
81. Murphy, N. A., Hall, J. A., & Colvin, R. C. (2003). Accurate intelligence assessments in social interactions: Mediators and gender effects. Journal of Personality, 71, 465-493. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.7103008
82. Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., & Funder, D. C. (2008). Beyond self-report in the study of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: Correlations with acquaintance reports, clinician judgments and directly observed social behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 643-659. doi:10.1016/ j.jrp.2007.09.001
83. North, R. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2009). Self-verification 360°: Illuminating the light and dark sides. Self and Identity, 8, 131-146. doi: 10.1080/15298860802501516
84. Norton, M. I., Frost, J. H., & Ariely, D. (2007). Less is more: The lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 97-105. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.97
85. Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (1985). Idiographic measurement strategies for personality and prediction: Some unredeemed promissory notes. Psychological Review, 92, 486-511. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92 .4.486
86. Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8, 162-166. doi:10.1111/j .1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x
87. Pennebaker, J., Booth, R., & Francis, M. (2007). Operator's manual: Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC2007. Austin, TX: LIWC.
88. Pennebaker, J. W., Mayne, T. J., & Francis, M. E. (1997). Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 863-871. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.863
89. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227. doi:10.1080/ 00273170701341316
90. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306
91. R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 2.8.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://cran.rproject.org/bin/macosx/old/R-2.8.1.dmg
92. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382. doi:10.1207/ s15327957pspr0804_3
93. Reis, H. T., Maniaci, M. R., Caprariello, P. A., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 557-570. doi:10.1037/a0022885
94. Riggio, H. R., & Riggio, R. E. (2002). Emotional expressiveness, extraversion, and neuroticism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 26, 195-218. doi:10.1023/A:1022117500440
95. Riggio, R. E., & Friedman, H. S. (1986). Impression formation: The role of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 421-427. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.421
96. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
97. Rogers, K. H., & Biesanz, J. C. (2013, January). Forming first impressions: Examining accuracy in intergroup interactions. Poster presented at Society for Personality and Social Psychology meeting, New Orleans, LA.
98. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
99. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1 .141
100. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations of the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
101. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big Five traits and its relations with authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380-1393. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1380
102. Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., & Funder, D. C. (2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330-343. doi:10.1037/a0019796
103. Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., & Funder, D. C. (2012). Properties of persons and situations relate to overall and distinctive congruence. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 87-101. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.006
104. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
105. Smyth, J. M. (1998). Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174-184. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.174
106. Snodgrass, S. E., Hecht, M. A., & Ploutz-Snyder, R. (1998). Interpersonal sensitivity: Expressivity or perceptivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 238-249. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.238
107. Stillman, T. F., Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Meaning as magnetic force. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 13-20. doi:10.1177/1948550610378382
108. Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1378-1391. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1378
109. Swann, W. B., Jr., De La Ronde, C., & Hixon, J. G. (1994). Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 857-869. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.857
110. Swann, W. B., & Hill, C. A. (1982). When our identities are mistaken: Reaffirming self-conceptions through social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 59-66. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43 .1.59
111. Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G. O. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1079-1094. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1079
112. Thomas, G., & Maio, G. R. (2008). Man, I feel like a woman: When and how gender-role motivation helps mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1165-1179. doi:10.1037/a0013067
113. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678-691. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
114. Wood, D., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2007). Normality evaluations and their relation to personality traits and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 861-879. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.861
115. Wood, J. V., Perunovic, W. Q., & Lee, J. W. (2009). Positive selfstatements: Power for some, peril for others. Psychological Science, 20, 860-866. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02370.x
116. Zaki, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. (2008). It takes two: The interpersonal nature of empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 19, 399-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02099.x
117. Zuckerman, M., Bernieri, F., Koestner, R., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). To predict some of the people some of the time: In search of moderators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 279 -293. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.279
118. Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., DeBoy, T., Garcia, T., Maresca, B. C., & Sartoris, J. M. (1988). To predict some of the people some of the time: A reexamination of the moderator variable approach in personality theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1006-1019. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1006