Combining dependent P-values with an empirical adaptation of Brown's method

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 17, 2016, Pages i430-i436

  Poole, William ^a   Gibbs, David L ^a   Shmulevich, Ilya ^a   Bernard, Brady ^a   Knijnenburg, Theo A ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; NEOPLASM; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84990978733     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw438     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Aerts, S. et al. (2006) Gene prioritization through genomic data fusion. Nat. Biotechnol., 24, 537-544
2. Alves, G. et al. (2014) Accuracy evaluation of the unified p-value from combining correlated p-values. PloS One, 9, e91225
3. Anders, S. and Huber, W. (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol., 11, R106
4. Benjamini, Y. and Heller, R. (2008) Screening for partial conjunction hypotheses. Biometrics, 64, 1215-1222
5. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol), 57, 289-300
6. Brennan, C.W. et al. (2013) The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell, 155, 462-477
7. Brown, M.B. (1975) 400: a method for combining non-independent, one-sided tests of significance. Biometrics, 31, 987-992
8. ENCODE Project Consortium. (2012b) An integrated encyclopedia of dna elements in the human genome. Nature, 489, 57-74
9. Fisher, R.A. (1948) Answer to question 14 on combining independent tests of significance. Am. Statistician, 2, 30-31
10. Friedman, N. et al. (2006) Linking stochastic dynamics to population distribution: an analytical framework of gene expression. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 168302
11. Genomes Project Consortium. (2012a) An integrated map of genetic variation from 1, 092 human genomes. Nature, 491, 56-65
12. Gully, C.P. et al. (2012) Aurora b kinase phosphorylates and instigates degradation of p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, E1513-E1522
13. Hartl, D.L. et al. (1997). Principles of Population Genetics, vol. 116 Sinauer Associates Sunderland
14. Knijnenburg, T.A. et al. (2009) Fewer permutations, more accurate p-values. Bioinformatics, 25, i161-i168
15. Kost, J.T. and McDermott, M.P. (2002) Combining dependent p-values. Stat. Probabil. Lett., 60, 183-190
16. Kundaje, A. et al. (2015) Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature, 518, 317-330
17. Lähdesmäki, H. et al. (2005) Intrinsic dimensionality in gene expression analysis. In: Proceedings of theGenomic Signal Processing and Statistics, pp. 1-2
18. Lee, S. et al. (2014) Rare-variant association analysis: study designs and statistical tests. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 95, 5-23
19. Loughin, T.M. (2004) A systematic comparison of methods for combining p-values from independent tests. Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 47, 467-485
20. Raychaudhuri, S. et al. (2000). Principal components analysis to summarize microarray experiments: application to sporulation time series. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. NIH Public Access, p. 455
21. Ringner, M. (2008) What is principal component analysis? Nat. Biotechnol., 26, 303-304
22. Schaefer, C.F. et al. (2009) Pid: the pathway interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D674-D679
23. Storey, J. (2015). qvalue: Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control. r package version 2.0. 0
24. Storey, J.D. (2002) A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Stat. Methodol), 64, 479-498
25. Whitlock, M. (2005) Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted z-method is superior to fisher's approach. J. Evol. Biol., 18, 1368-1373
26. Zaykin, D.V. et al. (2002) Truncated product method for combining p-values. Genet. Epidemiol., 22, 170-185