Effects of school-based educational interventions for enhancing adolescents abilities in critical appraisal of health claims: A systematic review

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  Nordheim, Lena V ^a,b   Gundersen, Malene W ^c   Espehaug, Birgitte ^a   Guttersrud, Oystein ^d   Flottorp, Signe ^d,e  

^a BERGEN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^e NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CINAHL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBASE; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDLINE; PSYCINFO; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCISEARCH; SKILL; SOCIAL WORK; STUDY DESIGN; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TEACHER; TEACHING; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; APTITUDE; EARLY CHILDHOOD INTERVENTION; GERMANY; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; INSURANCE; META ANALYSIS; PUBLISHING; SCHOOL; STUDENT; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; APTITUDE; EARLY INTERVENTION (EDUCATION); GERMANY; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INSURANCE CLAIM REVIEW; PUBLICATION BIAS; SCHOOLS; STUDENTS; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84990925082     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161485     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Manganello JA. Health literacy and adolescents: A framework and agenda for future research. Health Educ Res. 2008; 23: 840-847. doi: 10.1093/her/cym069 PMID: 18024979
2. Rideout VJ, Foehr UG, Roberts DF. Generation M2: media in the lives of 8-to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, California: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2010. Available: https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files. wordpress.com/2013/04/8010.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2016.
3. Ettel G, Nathanson I, Ettel D, Wilson C, Meola P. How do adolescents access health information? And do they ask their physicians? Permanente J. 2012; 16: 35-38.
4. Fergie G, Hunt K, Hilton S. What young people want from health-related online resources: A focus group study. J Youth Stud. 2013; 16: 579-596. PMID: 24748849
5. Skinner H, Biscope S, Poland B, Goldberg E. How adolescents use technology for health information: implications for health professionals from focus group studies. J Med Internet Res. 2003; 5: e32. Available: http://www.jmir.org/2003/4/e32/. PMID: 14713660
6. Cooper B, Lee W, Goldacre B, Sanders T. The quality of dietary advice given in UK national newspapers. Public Underst Sci. 2011; 21: 664-673. doi: 10.1177/0963662511401782
7. Glenton C, Paulsen EJ, Oxman AD. Portals to Wonderland: health portals lead to confusing information about the effects of health care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005; 5: 7. Available: http://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6947-5-7. PMID: 15769291
8. Fox S, Duggan M. Health Online 2013. Pew Research Center; 2013. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/. Accessed 31 May 2016.
9. Grilli R, Ramsay C, Minozzi S. Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; CD 000389. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd000389
10. Ybarra M, Suman M. Reasons, assessments and actions taken: sex and age differences in uses of Internet health information. Health Educ Res. 2008; 23: 512-521. PMID: 16880222
11. Gray NJ, Klein JD, Noyce PR, Sesselberg TS, Cantrill JA. Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: The place of the internet. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60: 1467-1478. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004. 08.010 PMID: 15652680
12. Tsai P, Chang W, Cheng S, Chang H. Young adolescents' intentional use of science news. Int J Sci Educ Pt B. 2013; 4: 281-304. doi: 10.1080/21548455.2013.817027
13. Pettersen S. Critical thinking in Norwegian upper secondary biology education: The cases of complementary-alternative-medicine and health claims in the media. Nord Stu Sci Educ. 2005; 1: 61-71.
14. Marks R, Higgins JW. Health literacy, health and academic status. In: Marks R, editor. Health literacy and school-based education. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 2012. pp. 43-62.
15. Horsley T, Hyde C, Santesso N, Parkes J, Milne R, Stewart R. Teaching critical appraisal skills in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; CD001270. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD001270.pub2 PMID: 22071800
16. Ryder J. Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Stud Sci Educ. 2001; 36: 1-44. doi: 10.1080/03057260108560166
17. Ryder J. School science education for citizenship: strategies for teaching about the epistemology of science. J Curriculum Stud. 2002; 34: 637-658. doi: 10.1080/00220270210148434
18. Austvoll-Dahlgren A, Oxman AD, Chalmers I, Nsangi A, Glenton C, Lewin S, et al. Key concepts that people need to understand to assess claims about treatment effects. J Evid Based Med. 2015; 8: 112-125. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12160 PMID: 26107552
19. Fine P, Goldacre B, Haines A. Epidemiology-A science for the people. Lancet. 2013; 381: 1249-1252. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60766-7 PMID: 23582383
20. Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W, Kurz-Milcke E, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2007; 8: 53-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053. 2008.00033.x PMID: 26161749
21. Kaelin MA, Huebner WW. Epidemiology, health literacy, and health education. Am J Health Educ. 2002; 33: 362-364.
22. Norman G. Critical thinking and critical appraisal. In: Norman GR, van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI, Dolmans DHJM, Mann KV, Rothman A, et al., editors. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2002. pp. 277-298.
23. Abrami PC, Bernard RM, Borokhovski E, Waddington DI, Wade CA, Persson T. Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 2015; 85: 275-314. doi: 10.3102/0034654314551063
24. Bennett J, Lubben F, Hogarth S. Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Sci Educ. 2007; 91: 347-370. doi: 10.1002/sce.20186
25. Hogarth S, Bennett J, Lubben F, Campbell B, Robinson A. ICT in science teaching: The effect of ICT teaching activities in science lessons on students' understanding of science ideas. In: Research Evidence in Education Library [Internet]. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. Available: http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=945. Accessed 31 May 2016.
26. Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 80. Available: http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-12-80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80 PMID: 22276600
27. Nutbeam D. The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67: 2072-2078. doi: 10.1016/j. socscimed.2008.09.050 PMID: 18952344
28. Sheridan SL, Halpern DJ, Viera AJ, Berkman ND, Donahue KE, Crotty K. Interventions for individuals with low health literacy: A systematic review. J Health Commun. 2011; 16 Suppl 3: 30-54. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604391 PMID: 21951242
29. Bergsma LJ, Carney ME. Effectiveness of health-promoting media literacy education: A systematic review. Health Educ Res. 2008; 23: 522-542. doi: 10.1093/her/cym084 PMID: 18203680
30. Car J, Lang B, Colledge A, Ung C, Majeed A. Interventions for enhancing consumers' online health literacy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(6: ): CD007092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007092.pub2 PMID: 21678364
31. Cusack L, Del Mar CB, Chalmers I, Hoffmann TC. Educational interventions to improve people's understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: A systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2016; 5: 1-8. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0213-9
32. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updates March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
33. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 PMID: 19621072
34. Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluation of training. In: Craig L, Bittel LR, editors. Training and Development Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967. pp. 87-112.
35. Ryan R, Hill S, Prictor M, McKenzie J, Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group. Study quality guide 2013. Available: http://cccrg.cochrane.org/authorresources. Accessed 31 May 2016.
36. Sterne JAC, Higgins JPT, Reeves BC, on behalf of the development group for ACROBAT-NRSI. A Cochrane Risk Of Bias assessment tool: for non-randomized studies of interventions (ACROBATNRSI). Version 1.0.0, 24 September 2014. Available: http://www.riskofbias.info. Accessed 31 May 2016.
37. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2014.
38. GRADEpro. [Computer program on www.gradepro.org]. Version [29.04.2015]. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University; 2014.
39. Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). What studies should be included in the Characteristics of excluded studies table? EPOC Resources for review authors. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2013. Available: http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-specific-resourcesreviewauthors. Accessed 31 May 2016.
40. Derry SJ, Levin JR, Osana HP, Jones MS. Developing middle-school students' statistical reasoning abilities through simulation gaming. In: Lajoie SP, editor. Reflections on statistics: learning, teaching, and assessment in Grades K-12. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1998. pp. 175-195.
41. Hendricks CC. Teaching causal reasoning through cognitive apprenticeship: What are results from situated learning? J Educ Res. 2001; 94: 302-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220670109598766
42. Hill CC. The effects of situated learning, abstracted instruction, and teaching for transfer on students' use of statistical reasoning to solve real-world problems. Doctoral Thesis. University of South Carolina 1998.
43. Kaelin MA, Huebner WW, Nicolich MJ, Kimbrough ML. Field test of an epidemiology curriculum for middle school students. Am J Health Educ. 2007; 38: 16-31. PMID: 18274623
44. Kuhn D, Ramsey S, Arvidsson TS. Developing multivariable thinkers. Cognitive Development. 2015; 35: 92-110. Study 2; p. 97-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.11.003
45. Kuhn D, Ramsey S, Arvidsson TS. Developing multivariable thinkers. Cognitive Development. 2015; 35: 92-110. Study 3; p. 104-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.11.003
46. Leshowitz B, Jenkens K, Heaton S, Bough TI. Fostering critical thinking skills in students with learning disabilities: An instructional program. J Learn Disabil. 1993; 26: 483-490. PMID: 8409746
47. Powell WA. The effects of emotive reasoning on secondary school students' decision-making in the context of socioscientific issues: University of South Florida; 2014.
48. Steckelberg A, Hülfenhaus C, Kasper J, Mühlhauser I. Ebm@school-A curriculum of critical health literacy for secondary school students: results of a pilot study. Int J Public Health. 2009; 54: 158-165. doi: 10.1007/s00038-008-7033-1 PMID: 19183847
49. Steckelberg A, Hulfenhaus C, Kasper J, Rost J, Muhlhauser I. How to measure critical health competences: development and validation of the Critical Health Competence Test (CHC Test). Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009; 14: 11-22. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9083-1 PMID: 17902033
50. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. PISA 2015: draft science framework. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2013. Available: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA% 202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2016.
51. Hale TM, Pathipati AS, Zan S, Jethwani K. Representation of health conditions on Facebook: Content analysis and evaluation of user engagement. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16: e182. doi: 10.2196/jmir. 3275 PMID: 25092386
52. Rutsaert P, Regan á, Pieniak Z, McConnon á, Moss A, Wall P, et al. The use of social media in food risk and benefit communication. Trends Food Sci Tech. 2013; 30: 84-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tifs.2012.10.006
53. Levin JR. Random thoughts on the (in)credibility of educational-psychological intervention research. Educ Psychol 2004; 39: 173-184.
54. Torgerson CJ, Torgerson DJ. The need for randomised controlled trials in educational research. Brit J Educ Stud. 2001; 49: 316-328.
55. Bennett J, Hogarth S, Lubben F, Campbell B, Robinson A. Talking Science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching. Int J Sci Educ. 2010; 32: 69-95. doi: 10.1080/09500690802713507
56. Jarman R, McClune B. A survey of the use of newspapers in science instruction by secondary teachers in Northern Ireland. Int J Sci Educ. 2002; 24: 997-1020.
57. Kachan M, Guilbert S, Bisanz G. Do teachers ask students to read news in secondary science?: Evidence from the Canadian context. Sci Educ. 2006; 90: 496-521.
58. Levinson R, Turner S. The teaching of social and ethical issues in the school curriculum, arising from developments in biomedical research: A research study of teachers. London: Institute of Education; 2001.
59. Nordheim L, Pettersen S, Flottorp S, Hjälmhult E. Critical appraisal of health claims: science teachers' perceptions and practice. Health Educ. 2016; 116: 449-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/HE-04-2015-0016
60. Moore L, Graham A, Diamond I. On the feasibility of conducting randomised trials in education: Case study of a sex education intervention. Brit Educ Res J. 2003; 29: 673-689.