Representation of health conditions on Facebook: Content analysis and evaluation of user engagement

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2014, Pages e182-

  Hale, Timothy M ^a   Pathipati, Akhilesh S ^b   Zan, Shiyi ^a   Jethwani, Kamal ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Facebook; Health communication; Information seeking behavior; Internet; Social media; Social networking sites; Social support

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERTIZING; BIBLIOMETRICS; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SEEKING; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORK; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; BIBLIOMETRICS; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

EID: 84907515232     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3275     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Fox S, Duggan M. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2013. Health online 2013 URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/PIP-HealthOnline.pdf [accessed 2014-01-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6MTHCH4MT]
2. Hesse BW, Moser RP, Rutten LJ. Surveys of physicians and electronic health information. N Engl J Med 2010 Mar 4;362(9):859-860. [doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0909595] [Medline: 20200398]
3. Cotten SR. Implications of internet technology for medical sociology in the new millennium. Sociological Spectrum 2001 Jul;21(3):319-340. [doi: 10.1080/027321701300202019]
4. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(4):e85 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1933] [Medline: 23615206]
5. Brenner J. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2013. Social networking 2013 URL: http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-Social-Networking-full-detail.aspx [accessed 2014-01-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6MTPLgHrQ]
6. Duggan M, Brenner J. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center The demographics of social media users 2012 URL: http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP-SocialMediaUsers.pdf [accessed 2014-01-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6MTPFfEKi]
7. Facebook.: Facebook, Inc; 2014. Key Facts - Facebook's latest news, announcements and media resources URL: http://newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts [accessed 2014-01-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6MTPYAhzE]
8. Greene JA, Choudhry NK, Kilabuk E, Shrank WH. Online social networking by patients with diabetes: a qualitative evaluation of communication with Facebook. J Gen Intern Med 2011 Mar;26(3):287-292 [FREE Full text] [doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1526-3] [Medline: 20945113]
9. Ahmed OH, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, McCrory P. iSupport: do social networking sites have a role to play in concussion awareness? Disabil Rehabil 2010 Jan;32(22):1877-1883. [doi: 10.3109/09638281003734409] [Medline: 20367328]
10. Gajaria A, Yeung E, Goodale T, Charach A. Beliefs about attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and response to stereotypes: youth postings in Facebook groups. J Adolesc Health 2011 Jul;49(1):15-20. [doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.09.004] [Medline: 21700151]
11. Bender JL, Jimenez-Marroquin MC, Jadad AR. Seeking support on Facebook: a content analysis of breast cancer groups. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(1):e16 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1560] [Medline: 21371990]
12. Thoren EM, Metze B, Bührer C, Garten L. Online support for parents of preterm infants: a qualitative and content analysis of Facebook 'preemie' groups. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013 Nov;98(6):F534-F538. [doi:10.1136/archdischild-2012-303572] [Medline: 23759520]
13. De la Torre-Díez I, Díaz-Pernas FJ, Antón-Rodríguez M. A content analysis of chronic diseases social groups on Facebook and Twitter. Telemed J E Health 2012;18(6):404-408. [doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0227] [Medline: 22650380]
14. Farmer AD, Bruckner Holt CE, Cook MJ, Hearing SD. Social networking sites: a novel portal for communication. Postgrad Med J 2009 Sep;85(1007):455-459. [doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.074674] [Medline: 19734511]
15. Frankhauser D. Mashable.com. 2013. 18 Facebook fossils we'll remember forever URL: http://mashable.com/2013/01/25/facebook-fossils/ [accessed 2014-01-08] [WebCite Cache ID 6MTPgMrJF]
16. Warble A. Notes by Facebook Engineering.: Facebook, Inc; 2010 Mar 16. Notes by Facebook engineering: intro to Facebook search URL: http://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/intro-to-facebook-search [accessed 2014-05-11] [WebCite Cache ID 6PUpifjMc]
17. Sajadi KP, Goldman HB. Social networks lack useful content for incontinence. Urology 2011 Oct;78(4):764-767. [doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.074] [Medline: 21862115]
18. Dobransky K, Hargittai E. Inquiring minds acquiring wellness: uses of online and offline sources for health information. Health Commun 2012;27(4):331-343. [doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.585451] [Medline: 21932982]
19. Percheski C, Hargittai E. Health information-seeking in the digital age. J Am Coll Health 2011;59(5):379-386. [doi:10.1080/07448481.2010.513406] [Medline: 21500056]
20. Robinson L. A taste for the necessary: a Bourdieuian approach to digital inequality. Information, Communication & Society 2009 Jun;12(4):488-507. [doi: 10.1080/13691180902857678]
21. Hargittai E, Hinnant A. Digital inequality: differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Communication Research 2008 Aug 04;35(5):602-621. [doi: 10.1177/0093650208321782]
22. DiMaggio P, Hargittai E, Celeste C, Shafer S. Digital inequality: from unequal access to differentiated use. In: Neckerman KM, editor. Social Inequality. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2004:355-400.
23. Viswanath K. Public communications and its role in reducing and eliminating health disparities. In: Thompson GE, Michell F, Williams MB, editors. Examining the health disparities research plan of the National Institutes of Health: unfinished business. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2006:215-252.
24. Viswanath K. Science and society: the communications revolution and cancer control. Nat Rev Cancer 2005 Oct;5(10):828-835. [doi: 10.1038/nrc1718] [Medline: 16195753]
25. Rains SA. The implications of stigma and anonymity for self-disclosure in health blogs. Health Commun 2014;29(1):23-31. [doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.714861] [Medline: 23356432]
26. Lampe C, Vitak J, Gray R, Ellison N. Perceptions of Facebook's value as an information source. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.: ACM; 2012 Presented at: CHI; May 5-10, 2012; Austin, TX p. 3195-3204. [doi: 10.1145/2207676.2208739]