STRUM: Structure-based prediction of protein stability changes upon single-point mutation

Bioinformatics

Volumn 32, Issue 19, 2016, Pages 2936-2946

  Quan, Lijun ^a,b   Lv, Qiang ^a,c   Zhang, Yang ^b  

^a SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics ^*  (United States)

^c NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; HUMAN; MOLECULAR MODEL; POINT MUTATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALGORITHMS; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; POINT MUTATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 84990882897     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw361     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Altschul, S.F. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-3402.
2. Bairoch, A. et al. (2008) The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D190-D195.
3. Brender, J.R. and Zhang, Y. (2015) Predicting the effect of mutations on protein-protein binding interactions through structure-based interface profiles. PLoS Comput. Biol., 11, e1004494.
4. Capriotti, E. et al. (2005) I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, W306-W310.
5. Capriotti, E. et al. (2008) A three-state prediction of single point mutations on protein stability changes. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 1.
6. Carra, J.H. and Privalov, P. (1996) Thermodynamics of denaturation of staphylococcal nuclease mutants: an intermediate state in protein folding. FASEB J., 10, 67-74.
7. Dehouck, Y. et al. (2009) Fast and accurate predictions of protein stability changes upon mutations using statistical potentials and neural networks: PoPMuSiC-2.0. Bioinformatics, 25, 2537-2543.
8. Dehouck, Y. et al. (2011) PoPMuSiC 2.1: a web server for the estimation of protein stability changes upon mutation and sequence optimality. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 151.
9. Duan, Y. et al. (2003) A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J. Comput. Chem., 24, 1999-2012.
10. Dunbrack, R.L. Jr. and Cohen, F.E. (1997) Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci., 6, 1661-1681.
11. Fariselli, P. et al. (2015) INPS: predicting the impact of non-synonymous variations on protein stability from sequence. Bioinformatics, 31, 2816-2821.
12. Friedman, J.H. (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat., 29, 1189-1232.
13. Giollo, M. et al. (2014) NeEMO: a method using residue interaction networks to improve prediction of protein stability upon mutation. BMC Genomics, 15, S7.
14. Guerois, R. et al. (2002) Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J. Mol. Biol., 320, 369-387.
15. Henikoff, S., and Henikoff, J.G. (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 10915-10919.
16. Henikoff, S. and Henikoff, J.G. (1994) Position-based sequence weights. J. Mol. Biol., 243, 574-578.
17. Kumar, M.D. et al. (2006) ProTherm and ProNIT: thermodynamic databases for proteins and protein-nucleic acid interactions. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D204-D206.
18. Kumar, P. et al. (2009) Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc, 4, 1073-1081.
19. Moult, J. et al. (2014) Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round x. Proteins, 82(Suppl 2), 1-6.
20. Ng, P.C. and Henikoff, S. (2001) Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Res., 11, 863-874.
21. Pedregosa, F. et al. (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825-2830.
22. Pires, D.E. et al. (2014) mCSM: predicting the effects of mutations in proteins using graph-based signatures. Bioinformatics, 30, 335-342.
23. Remmert, M. et al. (2012) HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat. Methods, 9, 173-175.
24. Roy, A. et al. (2010) I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc., 5, 725-738.
25. Sali, A. and Blundell, T.L. (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol., 234, 779-815.
26. Skjaerven, L. et al. (2014) Integrating protein structural dynamics and evolutionary analysis with Bio3D. BMC Bioinformatics, 15, 399.
27. Tennessen, J.A. et al. (2012) Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes. Science, 337, 64-69.
28. Tokuriki, N. and Tawfik, D.S. (2009) Stability effects of mutations and protein evolvability. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 19, 596-604.
29. Wainreb, G. et al. (2011) Protein stability: a single recorded mutation aids in predicting the effects of other mutations in the same amino acid site. Bioinformatics, 27, 3286-3292.
30. Wu, S. and Zhang, Y. (2007) LOMETS: A local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, 3375-3382.
31. Wu, S. and Zhang, Y. (2008a) ANGLOR: a composite machine-learning algorithm for protein backbone torsion angle prediction. PLoS One, 3, e3400.
32. Wu, S. and Zhang, Y. (2008b) MUSTER: improving protein sequence profile- profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins, 72, 547-556.
33. Xu, J. and Zhang, Y. (2010) How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5? Bioinformatics, 26, 889-895.
34. Yan, R. et al. (2013) A comparative assessment and analysis of 20 representative sequence alignment methods for protein structure prediction. Sci. Rep., 3, 2619.
35. Yang, J. et al. (2015) The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods, 12, 7-8.
36. Yang, Y. and Zhou, Y. (2008) Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures. Proteins, 72, 793-803.
37. Yates, C.M. and Sternberg, M.J. (2013) The effects of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) on protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol., 425, 3949-3963.
38. Zhang, J. et al. (2011) Atomic-level protein structure refinement using fragment-guided molecular dynamics conformation sampling, Structure 19, 1784-1795.
39. Zhang, J. and Zhang, Y. (2010) A novel side-chain orientation dependent potential derived from random-walk reference state for protein fold selection and structure prediction. PloS One, 5, e15386.
40. Zhang, Y. (2008) Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 18, 342-348.
41. Zhang, Y. and Skolnick, J. (2004) Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins, 57, 702-710.
42. Zhou, H. and Zhou, Y. (2002) Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci., 11, 2714-2726.