Post-fordism, political economy, and critical organizational communication studies

Management Communication Quarterly

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 259-267

  Nadesan, Majia Holmer ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990393861     PISSN: 08933189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0893318901152005     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Amin, A. (1994). Post-Fordism: Models, fantasies and phantoms of transition. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A reader (pp. 1-40). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
2. Brooks, P. (1999). Compensation inequality. Bureau of Labor Statistics [Online]. Available: http://stats.bls.gov/ore/abstract/ec/ec990040.htm
3. Carlone, D., & Taylor, B. (1998). Organizational communication and cultural studies: A review essay. Communication Theory, 8, 337-367.
4. Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Malden, MA: Basil Blackwell.
5. Charles, C. A. (1998). Building the global information economy: A roadmap from the Global Information Infrastructure Commission. New York: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
6. Clinton, A. (1997, August). Flexible labor: Restructuring the American work force. Monthly Labor Review, 120(8), 3-27.
7. Freeman, C., Clarke, J., & Soete, L. (1982). Unemployment and technical innovation. A study of long waves of economic development. London: Frances Pinter.
8. Frow, J. (1991). What was postmodernism? Sydney, Australia: Local Consumption.
9. Garrett, G. (2000). The causes of globalization. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 941-991.
10. Gartman, D. (1998). Postmodernism; or, the cultural logic of postmodernism? The Sociological Quarterly, 39, 119-137.
11. Hall, S. (1991). Brave new world. Socialist Review, 91(1), 57-64.
12. Hall, S., & Jacques, M. (Eds.). (1990). New times: The changing face of politics in the 1990s. London: Verso.
13. Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
14. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell.
15. Hirst, P., & Zeitlin, J. (1991). Flexible specialization versus post-Fordism: Theory, evidence and policy implications. Economy and Society, 20, 1-56.
16. Iversen, T., & Cusack, T. R. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics, 52, 313-349.
17. Jessop, B. (1991). Regulation theory, post-Fordism and the state: More than a reply to Werner Bonefeld. In W. Bonefeld & J. Holloway (Eds.), Post-Fordism and social form: A Marxist debate on the post-Fordist state (pp. 69-91). London: Macmillan.
18. Kiely, R. (1998). Globalization, post-Fordism and the contemporary context of development. International Sociology, 13, 95-115.
19. Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1987). The end of organized capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
20. Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. London: Sage.
21. Lipietz, A. (1987). Mirages and miracles: The crises of global Fordism. London: New Left Review.
22. Lipietz, A. (1997). The post-Fordist world: Labour relations, international hierarchy and global ecology. Review of International Political Economy, 4, 1-41.
23. Menzies, H. (1997). Telework, shadow work: The privatization of work in the new digital economy. Studies in Political Economy, 53, 103-123.
24. Ong, A. (1991). The gender and labour politics of postmodernity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 20, 279-280.
25. Patterson, R., & Wilson, E. J. (2000). New IT and social inequality: Resetting the research and policy agenda. The Information Society, 16, 77-86.
26. Perez, C. (1985). Microelectronics, long waves and world structural change: New perspectives for developing countries. World Development, 13, 441-463.
27. Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Prospects for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
28. Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Sassen, S. (1996). Losing control? Sovereignty in an age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
30. Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and its discontents. New York: New Press.
31. Sassen, S. (2000). Women’s burden: Counter-geographies of globalization and the feminization of survival. Journal of International Affairs, 53, 503-524.
32. Standing, G. (1999). Global feminization through flexible labor: A theme revisited. World Development, 27, 583-602.
33. Stark, B. (2000). Women and globalization: The failure and postmodern possibilities of international law. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 33(3), 503-553.
34. Tobin, J. (2000). Financial globalization. World Development, 28(6), 1101-1104.
35. United Nations Development Program. (1999). The human development report 1990-1999. New York: Author.
36. Vallas, S. P. (1999). Rethinking post-Fordism: The meaning of workplace flexibility. Sociological Theory, 17, 68-101.
37. Wallerstein, I. (1979). The capitalist world economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Zeytinoglu, I. U., & Muteshi, J. K. (1999). A critical review of flexible labour: Gender, race and class dimensions of economic restructuring. Resources for Feminist Research, 27(3/4), 97-120.