The Organization of Organizational Discourse

Management Communication Quarterly

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 213-226

  Prichard, Craig ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990385350     PISSN: 08933189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0893318906291979     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Abrahamson, E. (1997). The emergence and prevalence of employee management rhetorics: The effects of long waves, labor unions, and turnover, 1875 to 1992. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 491-533.
2. Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G. (1999). Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 708-740.
3. Alvesson, M. (1994). Talking in organizations—Managing identity and impressions in an advertising agency. Organization Studies, 15, 535-563.
4. Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53, 1125-1149.
5. Astley, W. G., & Zammuto, R. F. (1992). Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 3, 443-460.
6. Ball, K., & Hodgeson, D. (2001, July). Knowing your limits: Organization studies and discourse analytic technologies. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Critical Management Studies, Manchester, England.
7. Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion—Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 363-399.
8. Barry, D., & Elmes, M. (1997). Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of Management Review, 22, 429-452.
9. Chia, R. (2000). Discourse analysis as organizational analysis. Organization, 7, 513-518.
10. Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
11. Clark, T., & Salaman, G. (1998). Telling tales: Management gurus’ narratives and the construction of managerial identity. Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 137-161.
12. Cooper, D. J., Hinings, B., Greenwood, R., & Brown, J. L. (1996). Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: The case of Canadian law firms. Organization Studies, 17, 623-647.
13. Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., Heian, J. B., & Samuel, S. (1998). The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 293-327.
14. Davis, G. F., & Stout, S. K. (1992). Organization theory and the market for corporate-control—A dynamic analysis of the characteristics of large takeover targets, 1980-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 605-633.
15. DeCock, C., & Hipkin, I. (1997). TQM and BPR: Beyond the beyond myth. Journal of Management Studies, 34, 659-675.
16. Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60, 549-559.
17. Dugay, P. (1994). Making up managers—Bureaucracy, enterprise and the liberal art of separation. British Journal of Sociology, 45, 655-674.
18. Dugay, P., & Salaman, G. (1992). The culture of the customer. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 615-633.
19. Dugay, P., Salaman, G., & Rees, B. (1996). The conduct of management and the management of conduct: Contemporary managerial discourse and the constitution of the “competent” manager. Journal of Management Studies, 33, 263-282.
20. Fairclough, N., Graham, P., Lemke, J., & Wodak, R. (2004). Introduction. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(1), 1-7.
21. Fairhurst, G. T. (1993). The leader-member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry—A discourse analysis. Communication Monographs, 60, 321-351.
22. Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14(1), 5-26.
23. Fiske, J. (1996). Opening the hallway; Some remarks on the fertility of Stuart Hall’s contribution to critical theory. In D. Morley & H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 212-220). London: Routledge.
24. Fondas, N. (1997). Feminization unveiled: Management qualities in contemporary writings. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 257-282.
25. Fournier, V., & Grey, C. (1999). Too much, too little and too often: A critique of du Gay’s analysis of enterprise. Organization, 6(1), 107-128.
26. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21, 389-400.
27. Gherardi, S. (1999). Learning as problem-driven or learning in the face of mystery? Organization Studies, 20(1), 101-123.
28. Gill, S. (1992). Economic globalization and the internationalization of authority—Limits and contradictions. Geoforum, 23, 269-283.
29. Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., & Putnam, L. (Eds.). (2004). The Sage handbook of organizational discourse. London: Sage.
30. Grint, K., & Case, P. (1998). The violent rhetoric of re-engineering: Management consultancy on the offensive. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 557-577.
31. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1993). Family discourse, organizational embeddedness, and local enactment. Journal of Family Issues, 14(1), 66-81.
32. Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (1999). No joking matter: Discursive struggle in the Canadian refugee system. Organization Studies, 20(1), 1-24.
33. Hatch, M. J. (1997). Irony and the social construction of contradiction in the humor of a management team. Organization Science, 8, 275-288.
34. Heracleous, L., & Hendry, J. (2000). Discourse and the study of organization: Toward a structurational perspective. Human Relations, 53, 1251-1286.
35. Jessop, B. (1995). The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism—Alternative perspectives on economic and political-change. Economy and Society, 24, 307-333.
36. Jewkes, R., Abrahams, N., & Mvo, Z. (1998). Why do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services. Social Science & Medicine, 47, 1781-1795.
37. Kerfoot, D., & Knights, D. (1993). Management, masculinity and manipulation—From paternalism to corporate-strategy in financial services in Britain. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 659-677.
38. Knights, D., & Morgan, G. (1995). Strategy under the microscope—Strategic management and IT in financial services. Journal of Management Studies, 32, 191-214.
39. Lodge, D. (1988). Nice work. London: Penguin.
40. Lok, J., & Willmott, H. (2006). Institutional theory, language and discourse analysis: A comment on Phillips, Lawrence and Hardy. Academy of Management Review, 31, 477-488.
41. Newton, T. (1998). Theorizing subjectivity in organizations: The failure of Foucauldian studies? Organization Studies, 19, 415-447.
42. O’Neill, P., & Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1999). Enterprise discourse and executive talk: Stories that destabilize the company. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(1), 11-22.
43. Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (1996). Conflicting uses of metaphors: Reconceptualizing their use in the field of organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 21, 691-717.
44. Phillips, N. (2003). Discourse or institution? Institutional theory and the challenge of critical discourse analysis. In R. Westwood & S. R. Clegg (Eds.), Debating organization: Point/counterpoint (pp. 220-231). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
45. Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (1997). Managing multiple identities: Discourse, legitimacy and resources in the UK refugee system. Organization, 4(2), 159-185.
46. Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction (Vol. 50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Prichard, C. (2005). Challenging academic imperialism: Some tactics for constructing an organizational communication of the elsewhere. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 1-9.
48. Prichard, C., Jones, D., & Stablein, R. (2004). Doing discourse analysis in organization studies. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 213-236). London: Sage.
49. Sturdy, A. (1998). Customer care in a consumer society: Smiling and sometimes meaning it? Organization, 5(1), 27-53.
50. Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power knowledge, and its relevance for human-resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18, 518-545.
51. Tsoukas, H. (1992). Panoptic reason and the search for totality—A critical-assessment of the critical systems perspective. Human Relations, 45, 637-657.
52. Watson, T. J. (1995). Rhetoric, discourse and argument in organizational sense making—A reflexive tale. Organization Studies, 16, 805-821.
53. Westwood, B., & Clegg, S. (2003). The discourse of organization studies: Dissensus, politics and paradigms. In B. Westwood & S. Clegg (Eds.), Debating organization: Point-counterpoint in organization studies (pp. 1-42). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
54. Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (1994). The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large US corporations—When is more not better. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 121-142.
55. Zbaracki, M. J. (1998). The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 602-636.