Analysis and discussion of classroom and achievement data to raise student achievement

Data-based Decision Making in Education: Challenges and Opportunities

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 23-47

  Lai, Mei Kuin ^a   McNaughton, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Dust; Steam

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990306158     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Annan, B. (2007). A theory for schooling improvement: Consistency and connectivity to improve instructional practice. Unpublished thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland.
2. Annan, B., Lai, M. K., & Robinson, V. M. J. (2001). Teacher talk to improve teacher practices. SET, 1, 31-35.
3. Biemiller, A. (2001). Teaching vocabulary: Early, direct and sequential. American Educator, 25(1), 24-28 and 47.
4. Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. NewYork: Guilford.
5. Borman, G. D. (2000). Making the most of summer school: A meta analytic and narrative review. In H. Cooper, K. Charlton, J. C.Valentine & L. Muhlenbruck (Eds.), Monographs of the society for research in child development. 260(65), 119-127.
6. Borman, G. D. (2005). National efforts to bring reform to scale in high-poverty schools: Outcomes and implications. In L. Parker (Ed.), Review of research in education, (29, pp. 1-28). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
7. Buly, M. R., & Valencia, S. W. (2002). Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state reading assessments. Educational and Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 219-239.
8. Campbell, C., & Levin, B. (2009). Using data to support educational improvement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 47-65.
9. Cawelti, G., & Protheroe, N. (2001). High student achievement: How six school districts changed into high-performance systems. Arlington: Educational Research Service.
10. Coburn, C., Toure, J., & Yamashita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1115-1161.
11. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should be able to learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Wiley.
12. Earl, L., & Timperley, H. (Eds.). (2008). Evidence-based conversations to improve educational practices. Netherlands: Kluwer/Springer Academic.
13. Education Review Office (2009). Getting the most out of your ERO review: Schools. Wellington, New Zealand: Education Review Office. http://www.ero.govt.nz/Review-Process/For-Parents. Accessed 21 Jan 2010.
14. Elley, W. (2001). STAR supplementary test of achievement in reading: Years 4-6. Wellington. New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
15. Fancy, H. (2007). Schooling reform: Reflections on the New Zealand experience. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (Vol. 1). Netherlands: Springer.
16. Frederiksen, N. (1984). The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. American Psychologist. 39, 193-202.
17. Fuller, B., Wright, J., Gesicki, K., & Kang, E. (2007). Gauging growth: How to judge: No child left behind. Educational Researcher. 36, 268-278.
18. Halverson, R. (2003). Systems of practice: How leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(37). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n37.
19. Halverson, R. (2007). How leaders use artifacts to structure professional community. In L. Stoll & K. Seashore-Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 93-105). NewYork: Open University Press.
20. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
21. Lai, M. K., & McNaughton, S. (2008). Raising student achievement in poor, urban communities through evidence-based conversations. In L. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Evidence-based conversations to improve educational practices (pp. 13-27). Netherlands: Kluwer/Springer Academic.
22. Lai, M. K., & McNaughton, S. (2009). Not by achievement analysis alone: How inquiry needs to be informed by evidence from classrooms. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 44(2), 93-108.
23. Lai, M. K., & McNaughton, S. (2010). Evidence-informed discussions: The role of pedagogical content knowledge. In H.Timperley&J. Parr (Eds.), Weaving evidence, inquiry and standards to build better schools (pp. 157-172). Wellington: NewZealand Council for Educational Research.
24. Lai, M. K., McNaughton, S., Amituanai-Toloa, M., Turner, R., & Hsiao, S. (2009a). Sustained acceleration of achievement in reading comprehension: The New Zealand experience. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 30-56.
25. Lai, M. K., McNaughton, S., Timperley, H., &Hsiao, S. (2009b). Sustaining continued acceleration in reading comprehension achievement following an intervention. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 81-100.
26. McNaughton, S. (2002). Meeting of minds.Wellington: Learning Media.
27. McNaughton, S., & Lai, M. K. (2010). The learning schools model of school change to raise achievement in reading comprehension for culturally and linguistically diverse students in New Zealand. In P. H. Johnston (Ed.), RTI in literacy-responsive and comprehensive (pp. 313-331). Newark: International Reading Association.
28. McNaughton, S., Lai, M.K. & Hsiao, S. (2012). Testing the effectiveness of an intervention model based on data use: Areplication series across clusters of schools. School effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 203-228.
29. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
30. Reid, N. A., &Elley, sW. B. (1991). Revised progressive achievement tests: Reading comprehension. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
31. Robinson, V. M. J. (1993). Problem-based methodology: Research for the improvement of practice. Great Britain: Pergamon.
32. Robinson, V. M. J., & Lai, M. K. (2006). Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. California: Thousand Oaks Corwin.
33. Timperley, H., & Parr, J. (2010). Evidence, inquiry and standards. In H. Timperley & J. Parr (Eds.), Weaving evidence, inquiry and standards to build better schools.Wellington: NZCER.
34. Timperley, H., McNaughton, S., Lai, M. K., Hohepa, M., Parr, J., & Dingle, R. (2010). Towards an optimal model for building better schools. In H. Timperley & J. Parr (Eds.), Weaving evidence, inquiry and standards to build better schools (pp. 25-49).Wellington: NZCER.
35. Toole, J. C., & Seashore-Louis, K. (2002). The role of professional learning communities in international education. In K. L. P. Hallinger (Ed.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 245-279). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
36. Wang, J., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between US and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162-186.
37. Wilkinson, I.,&Son, A. (2010). Adialogic turn in research on learning and teaching to comprehends. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV). NewYork: Routledge.