Systems of practice: How leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 11, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Halverson, Richard R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442533075     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v11n37.2003     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming organizational defenses: Facilitating organizational learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
2. Ball, D. & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is - or might be - the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9): 6-8.
3. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P.B., Kerbow, D., Rollow, S., & Easton, J.Q. (1996). Catalyzing basic organizational change at the building level. In Charting Chicago School Reform,: Westview Press: Chicago. 93-129
4. Bryk, A. S., Camburn, E. & Louis, K. S. (1997). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
5. Bryk, A. S. & Schneider, B. (1996). Social trust: A moral resource for school improvement. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
6. Bryk, A. S. & Schneider, B. (1996). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage.
7. Bryk, A. S., Rollow, S. G., & Pinnel, G. S. (1996). Urban school development: Literacy as a lever for change. Educational Policy, 10(2), 172-201.
8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
9. Consortium for Chicago School Research (1998). Improving Chicago's schools: (Adams) School. Chicago: Consortium for Chicago School Research.
10. Cuban, L. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
11. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1): 3-13.
13. Cunningham, P. M., Hall, D. P. & Defee, M. (1998). Nonability grouped, multilevel instruction: Eight Years Later. Reading Teacher, 51.
14. Deal, T. E., and Peterson, K. D. (1990) The principal's role in shaping school culture. Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
15. Deal, T. E. & Peterson, K. D. (1994). The leadership paradox: Balancing logic and artistry in schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. DiMaggio. P. J. & Powell, W. W. (Eds.) (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
17. Driscoll, M. & Kerchner, C. (1988). The implications of social capital for schools, communities, and cities: Educational administration as if a sense of place mattered, In N. Boyan, (1988). Handbook of research on educational administration. New York: Longman.
18. Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington D.C.: Albert Shanker Institute.
19. Elmore, R. F. & Fuhrman S. (2001). Holding schools accountable: Is it working? Phi Delta Kappan, 83(1): 67-70.
20. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
21. Engeström, Y. (1996). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.) Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Fowler, F. C. (1999). Curioser and curioser: New concepts in the rapidly changing landscape of educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(4), 594-613.
23. Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little Brown.
24. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S. & Woolworth, S. (2000). What makes teacher community different from a gathering of teachers? Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
25. Halpin A. W., and Winer, B. J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. In Stogdill, R. M., and Coons, A. E. (Eds.) Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement. Columbus, OH: Bureau of Business Research of Ohio State University
26. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
27. Halverson, R. (2002). Representing phronesis: Supporting instructional leadership practice in schools. Unpublished dissertation. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
28. Halverson, R. & Zoltners, J. (2001). Distribution across artifacts: How designed artifacts illustrate school leadership. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Seattle: WA.
29. Huberman, M. (1995). Networks that alter teaching: Conceptualizations, exchanges and experiments. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 1, 2.
30. Kruse, S. D. & Louis, K. S. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
31. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1996). Collective responsibility for learning and its effects on gains in achievement for early secondary school students. American Journal of Education, 104(2), 103-147.
33. Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3): 325-340.
34. Little, J. W. & Bird, T. (1987). Instructional leadership 'close to the classroom' in secondary schools. In W. Greenfield. (Ed.) Instructional leadership: Concept, issues and controversies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
35. Louis, K. S., Kruse, S. D. & Bryk, A. S. (1995). Professionalism and community: What is it and why is it important in urban schools? In K. S. Louis and S. D. Kruse, (Eds.). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
36. Louis, K. S. & Kruse, S. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
37. Louis, K. S., Marks, H., & Kruse, S. D. (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757-98.
38. McLaughlin, M. W. & J. E. Talbert (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning. Stanford University: Center for Research on the Context of Learning.
39. Meyer, J. W. & B. Rowan (1983). The structure of educational organizations. In M. Meyer and W. R. Scott (eds.) Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. San Francisco Jossey-Bass.
40. Miller, B., Lord, B., & Dorney, J. (1994). Staff development for teachers. A study of configurations and costs in four districts. Newton, MA: Education Development Center.
41. Newmann, F. M. &. Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
42. Norman, D. A. (1988). Psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
43. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that makes us smart. New York: Addison-Wesley.
44. Ogawa, R. T. & Bossert, S. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(2), 224-43.
45. Peterson, K. D. & Deal, T. E. (2002). Shaping school culture fieldbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46. Peterson, P., McCarthey, S. J. & Elmore, R. F. (1996). Learning from school restructuring. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 119-153.
47. Powell, A., Farrar, E. & Cohen, D. K. (1985). Shopping Mall High School: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
48. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Workplace conditions that affect teacher quality and commitment: Implications for teacher induction programs. Elementary School Journal, 89(4), 421-39.
49. Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. Review of Research in Education, 16, 353-389.
50. Rowan, B. & Miskel, C. (1999). Institutional theory and the study of educational organizations. In J. Murphy and K. Seashore-Louis (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
51. Schein, E. (1992) Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
52. Seashore-Louis, K. & Marks, H. (1996). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
53. Simon, H. A. (1986). The science of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
54. Spillane, J. P. & Thompson, C. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency's capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 185-203.
55. Spillane, J. P. Halverson, R & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-27.
56. Stodolsky, S. S. and Grossman, P. L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subject. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 227-249.
57. Suchman, L. (1995). Making work visible. Communication of the ACM, 38(9), 227-239.
58. Supovitz, J. A. & Poglinco. S. M. (2001). Instructional leadership in a standards-based reform. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
59. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
60. Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Models: Representation and scientific understanding. Boston: Reidel.
61. Wehlage, G. G. (1993). Social capital and the rebuilding of communities: Issues in restructuring schools, Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
62. Wenger, E. McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
63. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1-19.
64. Weick, K. E. (1982). Administering education in loosely coupled schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 63(10), 673-76.
65. Youngs, P. & Kings, M. B. (2000). Professional development that addresses professional community in urban elementary schools. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.