Use of read-across tools

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 1425, Issue , 2016, Pages 305-322

  Manganelli, Serena ^a   Benfenati, Emilio ^a  

^a MARIO NEGRI INSTITUTE FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Italy)

Author keywords

Mutagenicity; REACH; Read across; Rules; SAR; Structural alerts; ToxRead

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; MUTAGEN TESTING; MUTAGENICITY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; READ ACROSS; SOFTWARE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; AMES TEST; CARCINOGENICITY; MODEL; MUTAGENIC ACTIVITY; PREDICTION; PREVALENCE; READ ACROSS ANALYSIS;

MUTAGENIC AGENT; SPIRONOLACTONE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MUTAGENS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84990207014     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3609-0_13     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Ames BN (1984) The detection of environmental mutagens and potential. Cancer 53:2030-2040
2. Piegorsch WW, Zeiger E (1991) Measuring intra-assay agreement for the Ames Salmonella assay. In: Hotorn L (ed) Statistical methods in toxicology, Lecture notes in medical informatics, vol 43. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 35-41
3. Ashby J (1985) Fundamental structural alerts to potential carcinogenicity or noncarcinogenicity. Environ Mutagen 7:919-921
4. Ashby J, Tennant RW (1988) Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the US NCI/NTP. Mutat Res 204:17-115
5. Benigni R, Bossa C (2006) Structural alerts of mutagens and carcinogens. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 2:169-176
6. Marchant CA, Briggs KA, Long A (2008) In silico tools for sharing data and knowledge on toxicity and metabolism: derek for windows, meteor, and vitic. Toxicol Mech Methods 18:177-187
7. Kazius J, McGuire R, Bursi R (2005) Derivation and validation of toxicophores for mutagenicity prediction. J Med Chem 48:312-320
8. Ferrari T, Cattaneo D, Gini G et al (2013) Automatic knowledge extraction from chemical structures: the case of mutagenicity prediction. SAR QSAR Environ Res 24:365-383
9. Klopman G (1992) MULTICASE 1. A hierarchical computer automated structure evaluation program. Quant Struct Act Rel 11:76-184
10. Klopman G, Rosenkranz HS (1994) Prediction of carcinogenicity/mutagenicity using MULTICASE. Mutation Res 305:33-46
11. Ahlberg E, Carlsson L, Boyer S (2014) Computational derivation of structural alerts from large toxicology data sets. J Chem Inf Model 54:2945-2952
12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) (2008) Guidance for industry, genotoxic and carcinogenic impurities in drug substances and products: recommended approaches. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/ dockets/98fr/fda-2008-d-0629-gdl.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2015
13. ToxRead. http://www.toxgate.eu. Accessed 7 July 2015
14. Gini G, Franchi AM, Manganaro A et al (2014) ToxRead: a tool to assist in read-across and its use to assess mutagenicity of chemicals. SAR QSAR Environ Res 25:999-1011
15. European Chemicals Agency (2012) Practical Guide 6: how to report read-across and categories. http://echa.europa.eu/documents/ 10162/13655/pg_report_readacross_en.pdf/. Accessed 7 July 2015
16. OECD (2014) The OECD QSAR toolbox, version 3.3.2. http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/ risk-assessment/theoecdqsartoolbox. htm. Accessed 7 July 2015
17. AMBIT, Version 2.4.11. http://ambit.sourceforge. net/. Accessed 7 July 2015
18. Toxmatch—OpenTox. http://www.opentox. org/dev/documentation/components/toxmatch. Accessed 7 July 2015
19. Leadscope. http://www.leadscope.com/. Accessed 23 July 2015
20. Analog Identification Methodology (AIM). http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/sf/tools/aim. htm
21. ChemIDplus. http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/ chemidplus/. Accessed 7 July 2015
22. European Chemicals Agency (2008) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals. http://echa.europa. eu/documents/10162/13632/information_ requirements_r6_en.pdf/. Accessed 23 July 2015
23. OECD (2014) Guidance on grouping of chemicals, 2nd ed. Environment Directorate Joint Meeting of the chemicals committee and the working party on chemicals, pesticides and biotechnology, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, ENV/JM/ MONO(2014)4. http://www.oecd.org/offi-cialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?c ote=env/jm/mono%282014%294&doclangu age=en. Accessed 7 July 2015
24. The CALEIDOS project: chemical Assessment according to Legislation Enhancing the In silico Documentation and Safe use. Funded by the LIFE+ EC Programme 2013-2015. http://www.caleidos-life.eu/. Accessed 23 July 2015
25. The PROSIL project: promoting the use of in silico methods in industry. Funded by the LIFE+ EC Programme 2013-2016. http:// www.life-prosil.eu/. Accessed 23 July 2015
26. The ANTARES project: alternative non-testing methods assessed for REACH substances. Funded by the LIFE+ EC Programme 2010-2012. http://www.antares-life.eu/. Accessed 7 July 2015
27. Hansen K, Mika S, Schroeter T et al (2009) Benchmark data set for in silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity. J Chem Inf Model 49:2077-2081
28. Chemical Carcinogenesis Research Information System (2009) NCRI informatics Initiative Homepage. http://www.cancerinformatics. org.uk/matrix/CCRIS.htm. Accessed 7 July 2015
29. Helma C, Cramer T, Kramer S, Raedt LD (2004) Data mining and machine learning techniques for the identification of mutagenicity inducing substructures and structure-activity relationships of noncongeneric compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44:1402-1411
30. Feng J, Lurati L, Ouyang H et al (2003) Predictive toxicology: benchmarking molecular descriptors and statistical methods. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:1463-1470
31. Judson PN, Cooke PA, Doerrer NG et al (2005) Towards the creation of an international toxicology information centre. Toxicology 213:117-128
32. Matthews EJ, Kruhlak NL, Cimino MC et al (2006) An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: I. Identification of carcinogens using surrogate endpoints. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 44:83-96
33. Benigni R, Bossa C, Jeliazkova N et al (2008) Benigni/Bossa rulebase for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity—a module of Toxtree. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. https://eurlecvam.jrc.ec.europa.eu/laboratoriesresearch/predictive_toxicology/doc/EUR_23241_EN.pdf.Accessed19Jun2015
34. Virtual models for evaluating the properties of chemicals within a global architecture. http://www.vega-qsar.eu/download.html. Accessed 7 July 2015
35. SMARTS—a language for describing molecular patterns. http://www.daylight.com/ dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smarts.htm l. Accessed 23 July 2015
36. Floris M, Manganaro A, Nicolotti O et al (2014) A generalizable definition of chemical similarity for read-across. J Cheminform 6:39
37. Byeon WH, Hyun HH, Lee SY (1976) Mutagenicity of nitro furan nitroimidazol and nitrothiazole derivatives on salmonella microsome system. Kor J Microbiol 14:151-158
38. ChemSpider. http://www.chemspider.com/. Accessed 7 July 2015
39. ACD/ChemSketch for academic and personal use. http://www.acdlabs.com/resources/ freeware/chemsketch/. Accessed 19 Jun 2015
40. Marvin, intuitive applications and API for chemical sketching, visualization and data exploration. http://www.chemaxon.com/ products/marvin/. Accessed 19 Jun 2015
41. Kode from data to knowledge. http://www. kode-solutions.net. Accessed 7 July 2015