Erratum: Impact of game-inspired infographics on user engagement and information processing in an ehealth program ((J Med Internet Res (2016) 18:9 (e237) DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5976);Impact of game-inspired infographics on user engagement and information processing in an ehealth program

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2016, Pages

  Comello, Maria Leonora G ^a   Qian, Xiaokun ^a   Deal, Allison M ^a   Ribisl, Kurt M ^a,b   Linnan, Laura A ^a,b   Tate, Deborah F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

eHealth; Game design; Infographics; Personalized feedback; Visuals

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRUIT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TELEHEALTH; TOBACCO USE; VEGETABLE;

EID: 84989915292     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7104     Document Type: Erratum

References (59)

1. Forjuoh S, Ory M, Wang S, des Bordes JK, Hong Y. Using the iPod Touch for patient health behavior assessment and health promotion in primary care. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2014;2(1):e14 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2927] [Medline: 25100308]
2. Douglas S, Caldwell B. Design and validation of an individual health report (IHR). Int J Ind Ergonomics 2011 Jul;41(4):352-359. [doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.02.004]
3. Bardus M, Smith J, Samaha L, Abraham C. Mobile phone and Web 2.0 technologies for weight management: A systematic scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2015;17(11):e259 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.5129] [Medline: 26573984]
4. Soler R, Leeks K, Razi S, Hopkins DP, Griffith M, Aten A, et al. A systematic review of selected interventions for worksite health promotion. The assessment of health risks with feedback. Am J Prev Med 2010 Feb;38(2 Suppl):S237-S262. [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.030] [Medline: 20117610]
5. Willey S, Walsh JK. Outcomes of a mobile health coaching platform: 12-week results of a single-arm longitudinal study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016;4(1):e3 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4933] [Medline: 26747611]
6. van der Weegen S, Verwey R, Spreeuwenberg M, Tange H, van der Weijden T, de Witte L. The development of a mobile monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity of people with a chronic disease in primary care: A user-centered design. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2013;1(2):e8 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2526] [Medline: 25099556]
7. Schubart J, Stuckey H, Ganeshamoorthy A, Sciamanna CN. Chronic health conditions and internet behavioral interventions: A review of factors to enhance user engagement. Comput Inform Nurs 2011 Feb;29(2):81-92. [doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3182065eed] [Medline: 21372645]
8. Smiciklas M. The Power of Infographics: Using Pictures to Communicate and Connect With Your Audiences. Indianapolis, IN: Que Biz-Tech; 2012.
9. King AJ, Jensen JD, Davis LA, Carcioppolo N. Perceived visual informativeness (PVI): construct and scale development to assess visual information in printed materials. J Health Commun 2014;19(10):1099-1115. [doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.878004] [Medline: 24742307]
10. Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. New York, NY: ACM; 2011 Presented at: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments; 2011; Tampere, Finland p. 9-15. [doi: 10.1145/2181037.2181040]
11. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA 2004 Mar 10;291(10):1238-1245. [doi: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1238] [Medline: 15010446]
12. Atkin CK, Freimuth V. Guidelines for formative evaluation research in campaign design. In: Rice RE, Atkin CK, editors. Public Communication Campaigns. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; Mar 06, 2012:53-68.
13. Pechmann C, Andrews C. Copy test methods to pretest advertisements. In: Sheth JN, Malhotra NK, editors. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010.
14. International Cancer Screening Network. Designing Print Materials: A Communications Guide for Breast Cancer Screening. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2007.
15. Ancker J, Senathirajah Y, Kukafka R, Starren JB. Design features of graphs in health risk communication: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13(6):608-618 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2115] [Medline: 16929039]
16. Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely E. Communicating health risks with visual aids. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2013 Sep 25;22(5):392-399. [doi: 10.1177/0963721413491570]
17. Houts P, Doak C, Doak L, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2006 May;61(2):173-190. [doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004] [Medline: 16122896]
18. Witteman H, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Wijeysundera H, Exe N, Dickson M, Holtzman L, et al. Animated randomness, avatars, movement, and personalization in risk graphics. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(3):e80 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2895] [Medline: 24642037]
19. Noar S, Harrington N. eHealth Applications: Promising Strategies for Health Behavior Change. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012.
20. Delp C, Jones J. Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Acad Emerg Med 1996 Mar;3(3):264-270 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 8673784]
21. Paivio A. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1990.
22. David P. News concreteness and visual-verbal association: Do news pictures narrow the recall gap between concrete and abstract news? Human Comm Res 1998 Dec;25(2):180-201. [doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00442.x]
23. Zikmund-Fisher B, Witteman H, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Exe N, Kahn V, Dickson M. Animated graphics for comparing two risks: A cautionary tale. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(4):e106 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2030] [Medline: 22832208]
24. Schapira M, Nattinger A, McHorney C. Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care. Med Decis Making 2001;21(6):459-467. [Medline: 11760103]
25. McGuire WJ. Public communication as a strategy for inducing health-promoting behavioral change. Prev Med 1984 May;13(3):299-319. [Medline: 6387698]
26. MacKenzie S, Lutz R, Belch G. The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. J Marketing Res 1986 May;23(2):130-143. [doi: 10.2307/3151660]
27. Mitchell A, Olson J. Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? J Marketing Res 1981 Aug;18(3):318-332. [doi: 10.2307/3150973]
28. Shimp T. Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. J Advertising 1981 Jun;10(2):9-48. [doi: 10.1080/00913367.1981.10672756]
29. Olney T, Holbrook M, Batra R. Consumer responses to advertising: the effect of ad content, emotions, and attitude toward the ad on viewing time. J Consumer Res 1991 Mar;17(4):440-453. [doi: 10.1086/208569]
30. Kelly K, Slater M, Karan D. Image advertisements' influence on adolescents' perceptions of the desirability of beer and cigarettes. J Public Policy Marketing 2002 Sep;21(2):295-304. [doi: 10.1509/jppm.21.2.295.17585]
31. Mollick E, Rothbard N. Mandatory fun: gamification and the impact of games at work. SSRN J 2013:1. [doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2277103]
32. Lounis S, Neratzouli X, Pramatari K. Can gamification increase consumer engagement? A qualitative approach on a green case. In: Douligeris C, Polemi N, Karantjias A, Lamersdorf W, editors. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Berlin: Springer; 2013:200-212.
33. Baranowski T, Buday R, Thompson DI, Baranowski J. Playing for real: video games and stories for health-related behavior change. Am J Prev Med 2008 Jan;34(1):74-82 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.027] [Medline: 18083454]
34. Cugelman B. Gamification: what it is and why it matters to digital health behavior change developers. JMIR Serious Games 2013;1(1):e3 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/games.3139] [Medline: 25658754]
35. Ahola R, Pyky R, Jämsä T, Mäntysaari M, Koskimäki H, Ikäheimo TM, et al. Gamified physical activation of young men: multidisciplinary population-based randomized controlled trial (MOPO study). BMC Public Health 2013 Jan 14;13(1):a. [doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-32] [Medline: 23311678]
36. Consolvo S, Klasnja P, McDonald D, Avrahami D, Froehlich J, LeGrand L, et al. Flowers or a robot army? Encouraging awareness & activity with personal, mobile displays. New York, NY: ACM; 2008 Presented at: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing; 2008; Seoul, South Korea p. 54-63. [doi: 10.1145/1409635.1409644]
37. McCallum S. Gamification and serious games for personalized health. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012;177:85-96. [Medline: 22942036]
38. Sue D, Ray P, Talaei-Khoei A, Jonnagaddala J, Vichitvanichphong S. Assessing video games to improve driving skills: A literature review and observational study. JMIR Serious Games 2014;2(2):e5 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/games.3274] [Medline: 25654355]
39. Cafazzo J, Casselman M, Hamming N, Katzman D, Palmert M. Design of an mHealth app for the self-management of adolescent type 1 diabetes: A pilot study. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(3):e70 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2058] [Medline: 22564332]
40. Cheema A, Bagchi R. The effect of goal visualization on goal pursuit: implications for consumers and managers. J Marketing 2011 Mar;75(2):109-123. [doi: 10.1509/jmkg.75.2.109]
41. Werbach K, Hunter D. For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Digital Press; 2012.
42. Schell J. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2008.
43. Marczewski A. Gamasutra. 2013 Oct 24. Game Thinking-Breaking Down Gamification and Games URL: http://www. gamasutra.com/blogs/AndrzejMarczewski/20131024/203054/Game-Thinking-Breaking-down-gamification-and-games. php [accessed 2016-08-23] [WebCite Cache ID 6jyvusCwG]
44. Gallagher K, Updegraff J. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med 2012 Feb;43(1):101-116. [doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7] [Medline: 21993844]
45. Lipkus IM, Pollak KI, McBride CM, Schwartz-Bloom R, Lyna P, Bloom PN. Assessing attitudinal ambivalence towards smoking and its association with desire to quit among teen smokers. Psychol Health 2005 Jun;20(3):373-387. [doi: 10.1080/08870440512331333988]
46. Fazio R, Powell M, Williams C. The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process. J Consumer Res 1989 Dec;16(3):280-288. [doi: 10.1086/209214]
47. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling S. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. [doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980] [Medline: 26162106]
48. Carter R, DiFeo A, Bogie K, Zhang GQ, Sun J. Crowdsourcing awareness: exploration of the ovarian cancer knowledge gap through Amazon Mechanical Turk. PLoS One 2014;9(1):e85508 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085508] [Medline: 24465580]
49. Borgida E, Nisbett R. The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions. J Appl Social Pyschol 1977 Sep;7(3):258-271. [doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1977.tb00750.x]
50. Fazio RH. A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In: Hendrick C, Clark MB, editors. Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990:74.
51. Eveland WP, Dunwoody S. User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load? Commun Res 2001 Feb 01;28(1):48-78. [doi: 10.1177/009365001028001002]
52. Pechmann C, Reibling E. Antismoking advertisements for youths: An independent evaluation of health, counter-industry, and industry approaches. Am J Public Health 2006 May;96(5):906-913. [doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057273] [Medline: 16571709]
53. Dillard J, Shen L, Vail R. Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Commun Res 2007 Oct;33(4):467-488. [doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x]
54. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire 2011. 2011 Jan
55. URL: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/pdf-ques/2011brfss.pdf [accessed 2016-08-23] [WebCite Cache ID 6jyxM3OOp]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire 2008. 2007 Dec
56. URL: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/pdf-ques/2008brfss.pdf [accessed 2016-08-23] [WebCite Cache ID 6jyxV29LC]
57. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 2009. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2009-2010/questionnaires09-10.htm [accessed 2016-08-23] [WebCite Cache ID 6jyxWCeuV]
58. Slater M, Peter J, Valkenberg PM. Message variability and heterogeneity: A core challenge for communication research. Commun Yearbook 2015;39:3-31 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 26681816]
59. Hall KL, Rossi JS. Meta-analytic examination of the strong and weak principles across 48 health behaviors. Prev Med 2008 Mar;46(3):266-274. [doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.006] [Medline: 18242667]