Use of confocal microscopy for quantification of plastic remnants on rough titanium after instrumentation and evaluation of efficacy of removal

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 519-525

  Yang, Seung Min ^a   Park, Jun Beom ^b   Ko, Youngkyung ^b  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Chlorhexidine; Dental implant; Dental scaling; Microscopy; Plastics; Titanium

Indexed keywords

PLASTIC; TITANIUM; TOOTH IMPLANT;

CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DENTAL SCALING; DEVICES; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT; ULTRASOUND;

DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL SCALING; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; PLASTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 84989768816     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3500     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of periimplant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:286-291.
2. Claffey N, Clarke E, Polyzois I, Renvert S. Surgical treatment of periimplantitis. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:316-332.
3. Renvert S, Roos-Jansåker A-M, Claffey N. Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: A literature review. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:305-315.
4. Muthukuru M, Zainvi A, Esplugues EO, Flemmig TF. Non-surgical therapy for the management of peri-implantitis: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(suppl 6):77-83.
5. Renvert S, Polyzois I, Claffey N. Surgical therapy for the control of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:84-94.
6. Louropoulou A, Slot DE, Van der Weijden F. The effects of mechanical instruments on contaminated titanium dental implant surfaces: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1149-1160.
7. Ruhling A, Kocher T, Kreusch J, Plagmann HC. Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon-coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:19-29.
8. Speelman JA, Collaert B, Klinge B. Evaluation of different methods to clean titanium abutments. A scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:120-127.
9. Quirynen M, van der Mei HC, Bollen CM, et al. An in vivo study of the influence of the surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra-and subgingival plaque. J Dent Res 1993;72: 1304-1309.
10. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Sculean A, Georg T, Scherbaum W, Becker J. Effects of an Er:YAG laser and the Vector ultrasonic system on the biocompatibility of titanium implants in cultures of human osteoblast-like cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:784-792.
11. Unursaikhan O, Lee JS, Cha JK, et al. Comparative evaluation of roughness of titanium surfaces treated by different hygiene instruments. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2012;42:88-94.
12. Gosau M, Hahnel S, Schwarz F, Gerlach T, Reichert TE, Burgers R. Effect of six different peri-implantitis disinfection methods on in vivo human oral biofilm. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:866-872.
13. Piruska A, Nikcevic I, Lee SH, et al. The autofluorescence of plastic materials and chips measured under laser irradiation. Lab Chip 2005;5:1348-1354.
14. Daims H, Lucker S, Wagner M. DAIME, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. Environ Microbiol 2006;8:200-213.
15. Schwarz F, Papanicolau P, Rothamel D, Beck B, Herten M, Becker J. Influence of plaque biofilm removal on reestablishment of the biocompatibility of contaminated titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;77:437-444.
16. Dmytryk JJ, Fox SC, Moriarty JD. The effects of scaling titanium implant surfaces with metal and plastic instruments on cell attachment. J Periodontol 1990;61:491-496.
17. Sato S, Kishida M, Ito K. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: An in vitro study. J Periodontol 2004;75: 1269-1273.
18. Duarte PM, Reis AF, de Freitas PM, Ota-Tsuzuki C. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments. J Periodontol 2009;80:1824-1832.
19. Ramaglia L, di Lauro AE, Morgese F, Squillace A. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations. Implant Dent 2006;15:77-82.
20. Rapley JW, Swan RH, Hallmon WW, Mills MP. The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5:47-52.
21. Hallmon WW, Waldrop TC, Meffert RM, Wade BW. A comparative study of the effects of metallic, nonmetallic, and sonic instrumentation on titanium abutment surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:96-100.
22. Park JB, Jang YJ, Koh M, Choi BK, Kim KK, Ko Y. In vitro analysis of the efficacy of ultrasonic scalers and a toothbrush for removing bacteria from resorbable blast material titanium disks. J Periodontol 2013;84:1191-1198.
23. Kawashima H, Sato S, Kishida M, Yagi H, Matsumoto K, Ito K. Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study. J Periodontol 2007;78:1689-1694.
24. 2 laser treatment at various energies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1522-1527.
25. Park JB, Jang YJ, Koh M, Choi BK, Kim KK, Ko Y. In vitro analysis of the efficacy of ultrasonic scalers and a toothbrush for removing bacteria from RBM titanium discs. J Periodontol 2013;84:1191-1198.
26. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007;6:997-1003.
27. Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, McLachlan T, et al. Differential responses of osteoblast lineage cells to nanotopographically-modified, microroughened titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy surfaces. Biomaterials 2012;33:8986-8994.