The translation of advertising: A framework for evaluation

Babel

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 133-157

  Adab, Beverly ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989404215     PISSN: 05219744     EISSN: 15699668     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/babel.47.2.05ada     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adab, B. 2000a. “The Translation of Advertising: A Set of Guidelines”. In Beeby, A. (ed.), Investigating Translation, Cha Pter 21, 225-237. Amsterdam, Benjamins.
2. Adab, B. 2000b. “Cross-cultural assum Ptions in the translation of advertising — how realistic are these?”. In Across Languages and Cultures, I/2, vol 1(2). 2000, Akademiai Kiadô Publishing Com Pany, Buda Pest 193-207.
3. Adab, B. 1998. (un Published thesis) “Translation Strategies and Cross-Cultural Constraints: A Case Study of the Translation of Advertising Texts”. Aston University, Birmingham, UK, 335 PP.
4. Catford, J. 1965, 1974. A Linguistic Theory of Translation. An Essay in A PPlied Linguistics. London, Oxford University Press, viii, 103 PP.
5. Cathelat, B. 1992. Publicité et Société. Paris, Payot, 447 PP.
6. Chesterman, A. (ed.) 1989. Readings in Translation Theory. Finland, Oy Finn Lectura Ab, 200 PP.
7. Chesterman, A. 1997. The Memes of Translation: the S Pread of Ideas in Translation Theory. Amsterdam, Benjamins, vii, 219 PP.
8. De Beaugrande, R., Dressier, U. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London, Longman. 270 PP.
9. De Mooij, M. 1998. Global Marketing and Advertising: Understanding Cultural Paradoxes. London, Sage, 315 PP.
10. Floch, J.-M. 1990. Sémiotique, Marketing et Communication: Sous les Signes, les Stratégies. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 256 PP.
11. Gouadec, D. 1990. Traduction signalétique. Meta, XXXV-2, 332-341. In C. Schäffner, B. Adab (eds) (2000), Develo Ping Translation Com Petence. Amsterdam, Benjamins, 244 PP.
12. V. Vienne, “On translation com Petence and translation situation”, 91-100.
13. Gouadec, D. 1989. “Com Prendre, évaluer, Prévenir”. TTR 2, 2, 35-54.
14. Grice, H. 1975. “Logic and Conversation”. In Cole, P., Morgan, J. (eds): Syntax and Semantics 3: S Peech Acts. New York, Academic Press: 41-58.
15. Gutt, E.-A. 1991. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Oxford, Blackwell, ix, 222 PP.
16. Gutt, E.-A. 1997. “Im Plicit Information in Literary Translation: a Relevance-Theoretic Pers Pective”. Target 8:2, 239-256.
17. Harris, B. 1983. “Co-Writing: A Canadian Technique for Communicative Equivalence”. In: von Jäger, G. (ed.), Semantik und Übersetzungswissenschaft: Materialen der III. Konferenz "Grundfragen der Übersetzungswissenschaft". Lei Pzig, VEB Verlag Enzyklo Pädie P.121-132.
18. Hewson, L., Martin, J. 1991. Redefining Translation: The Variational A PProach. London, Routledge, vii, 263 PP.
19. Holz Mänttäri, J. 1984. Translatorisches Handeln. Theorie und Methode. Helsinki, Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 109-111.
20. Hönig, H. 1997. “ Positions, Power and Practice: Functionalist A PProaches and Translation Quality Assessment”. In Contem Porary Issues in Language and Society, C. Schäffner (ed.), vol 4, no.1, Clevedon, Multilingual Matters, 6-34.
21. House, J. 1977. Towards a Model of Translation Quality Assessment. Tübingen: Narr. Revised and reissued as Translation Quality Assessment A Model Revisited (1997), Tübingen: Narr, viii, 207 PP.
22. Kochan, N. (ed.) 1996. The World’s Greatest Brands. London, McMillan Business, 188 PP.
23. McAlester, G. “The Evaluation of Translation into the Foreign Language”. In Schäffner, C., Adab, B. (2000), 229-241.
24. Malmkjaer, K. 1997. “Linguistics in Functionland: A Res Ponse to Hans G Hönig”. In Contem Porary Issues in Language and Society, C. Schäffner (ed.), vol 4, no.1, Clevedon, Multilingual Matters, 70-74.
25. Neubert, A. 1985. Text and Translation. Lei Pzig, VEB Verlag Enzyklo Pädie, 168 PP.
26. Neubert, A., Shreve, G.M. 1992. Translation as Text. London, Kent State University Press, 169 PP.
27. Newmark, P. 1981. A PProaches to Translation. Toronto, Pergamon, 200 PP., quoted in Williams, M. (1989).
28. Newmark, P. 1990. A Textbook of Translation. London, Prentice Hall, 292 PP.
29. Nida, E. A. 1969. Towards a Science of Translating. Leiden, Brill, x, 331 PP.
30. Nida, E. A., Taber, C. R. 1974. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden, Brill, 218 PP.
31. Nord, C. 1997. Translating as a Pur Poseful Activity: Functionalist A PProaches Ex Plained. Manchester, St Jerome, 154 PP.
32. Nord, C. 1991. Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology and Didactic A PPlication of a Model for Translation-Oriented Text Analysis, translated from German by Christiane Nord and Penelo Pe S Parrow, Rodo Pi, Amsterdam, 253 PP.
33. Reiss, K. 1977. “Textty Pen, Übersetzungsty Pen und die Beurteilung von Übersetzungen”, Lebende S Prachen 1977: 97-100, Published in English in Chesterman, A. (ed.) 1989.
34. Reiss, K., Vermeer, H. 1984. Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie. Tübingen, Niemeyer, viii, 294 PP.
35. S Perber, D., Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. London, Blackwell, 326 PP.
36. Vermeer, H. 1998. “Starting to Unask What Translatology Is About”. Target 10.198, 41-68.
37. Vienne, J. “On translation com Petence and translation situation”. In C. Schäffner, B. Adab (eds) (2000), Develo Ping Translation Com Petence. Amsterdam, Benjamins, 91100.
38. Vinay, J.- P., Darbelnet, J. 1977. Stylistique com Parée de l’anglais et du français. Paris, Didier, 331 PP.
39. Williams, M. 1989. “The Assessment of Professional Translation Quality: Creating Credibility out of Chaos”. TTR 2.2.1989: 13-33.
40. Williamson, J. 1978. Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning. London, Marion Boyars, 180 PP.