The processing of information from multiple sources in simultaneous interpreting

Interpreting

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 95-115

  Jesse, Alexandra ^a   Vrignaud, Nick ^a   Cohen, Michael M ^a   Massaro, Dominic W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989382918     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.5.2.04jes     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, L. (1994). Simultaneous Interpretation: Contextual and Translation Aspects. In S. Lambert &B. Moser-Mercer (Eds), Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation (pp. 101-120). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2. Balzani, M. (1990). Le contact visuel en interpretation simultanee: resultats d’une experience (Franais-Italien). In L. Gran &C. Taylor (Eds), Aspects of Applied and Experimental Research on Conference Interpretation (pp.93-100). Udine: Campanotto Editore.
3. Benoit, C., Mohamadi, T., &Kandel, S. (1994). Effects of phonetic context on audio-visual intelligibility of French. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 1195-1203.
4. Bernstein, L.E., Demorest, M.E., &Eberhardt, S. P. (1994). A computational approach to analyzing sentential speech perception: Phoneme- to-phoneme stimulus-response alignment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3617-3622.
5. Bernstein, L.E., &Eberhardt, S.P. (1986). Johns Hopkins lip-reading corpus videodisk set. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University.
6. Black, A., &Taylor, P. (1997). Festival Speech Synthesis System: System documentation (1.1.1), Human Communication Research Centre Technical Report HCRC/TR-83, Edinburgh.
7. Cisneros, S. (1991). The House on Mango Street. Vintage Books: New York, NY.
8. Cohen, M.M., &Massaro, D.W. (1993) Modeling coarticulation in synthetic visual speech, In Models and Techniques. In D. Thalmann &N. Magnenat-Thalmann (Eds.), Computer Animation (pp. 141-155). Tokyo: Springer.
9. Cohen, M.M., Walker, R.L., &Massaro, D.W. (1996). Perception of synthetic visual speech. In D.G. Stork &M.E. Hennecke (Eds.), Speechreading by humans and machines (pp. 153-168). New York: Springer.
10. Davis, H., &Silverman, S. R. (1978). Hearing and deafness (4th Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11. Gerver, D. (1974). The effects of noise on the performance of simultaneous interpreters: Accuracy of performance. Acta Psychologica, 38,159-167.
12. Gile, D. (1997). Conference interpreting as a cognitive management problem. In J.H. Danks, G.M. Shreve, S.B. Fountain, &M.K. McBeath (Eds), Cognitive processes in translation and interpreting (pp. 196-214). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
13. Gile, D. (1999). Testing the Effort Models’ tightrope hypothesis in simultaneous interpreting — A contribution. Journal of Linguistics, 23,153-172.
14. Massaro, D.W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
15. Massaro, D.W., &Shlesinger, M. (1997). Information processing and a computational approach to the study of simultaneous interpretation, Interpreting, 2, 13-53.
16. McGurk, H., &MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
17. Meyer, D.E., &Kieras, D.E. (1999) Precis to a Practical Unified Theory of Cognition and Action: Some Lessons from EPIC Computational Models of Human Multiple-Task Performance. Attention and Performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 17-88). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Nicholson, K.G., Baum, S., Cuddy, L. &Munhall, K.G. (2002). A case of impaired auditory and visual speech prosody perception after right hemisphere damage. Neurocase, 8, 314-322.
19. Risberg, A., &Lubker, J. (1978). Prosody and speechreading. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress Report Status Report, 4,1-16.
20. Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., Meyer, D.E. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12(2), 101-108.
21. Sumby, W.H., &Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
22. Sutton, S., Cole, R.A., deVilliers, J., Schalkwyk, J., Vermeulen, P., Macon, M., Yan, Y., Kaiser, E., Rundle, B., Shobaki, K., Hosom, P., Kain, A., Wouters, J., Massaro, D.W., Cohen, M. (1998). Universal Speech Tools: the CSLU Toolkit. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Sydney, Australia, 3221-3224.
23. Waibel, A. (1996). Interactive translation of conversational speech. Computer, 29, 41-48.