A case of impaired auditory and visual speech prosody perception after right hemisphere damage

Neurocase

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 314-322

  Nicholson, Karen G ^a   Baum, Shari ^a   Cuddy, Lola L ^a   Munhall, Kevin G ^a  

^a MOUNT ALLISON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amusia; Aprosodia; Audio visual speech; Prosody; Right hemisphere damage

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ATROPHY; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN REGION; CASE REPORT; CEREBELLUM; COGNITION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; EDUCATION; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTEGRATION; INTELLECT; MALE; MEMORY; MUSIC; PARALYSIS; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PERCEPTION DISORDER; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SENSORY SYSTEM; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL INFORMATION;

AGED; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036378915     PISSN: 13554794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/neucas/8.4.314     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baum S, Pell MD. The neural bases of prosody: Insights from lesion studies and neuroimaging. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 581-608.
2. Benton AL, Hamsher K, Varney NR, Spreen O. Contributions to neuropsychological assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.
3. Bernstein LE, Eberhardt SP, Demorest ME. Single-channel vibrotactile supplements to visual perception of intonation and stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989; 85: 397-405.
4. Bernstein LE, Demorest ME, Tucker PE. Speech perception without hearing. Perception and Psychophysics 2000; 62: 233-52.
5. Blair JR, Spreen O. Predicting premorbid IQ: A revision of the National Adult Reading Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1989; 3: 129-36.
6. Boothroyd A. Perception of speech pattern contrasts from auditory presentation of voice fundamental frequency. Ear and Hearing 1988; 9: 313-21.
7. Calvert GA, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Campbell R, Williams SCR, McGuire PK et al. Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science 1997; 276: 593-6.
8. Calvert GA, Campbell R, Brammer MJ. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Current Biology 2000; 10: 649-57.
9. Campbell R, Landis T, Regard M. Face recognition and lipreading. A neurological dissociation. Brain 1986; 109: 509-21.
10. Campbell R, Dodd B, Burnham D. Hearing by eye II: Advances in the psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech. London: Psychology Press, 1998.
11. Ekman P. About brows: Emotional and conversational signals. In: Aschoff J, von Carnack M, Foppa K, Lepenies W, Plog D, editors. Human ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979: 169-202.
12. Fisher CG. The visibility of terminal pitch contour. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1969; 12: 379-82.
13. Fougeron C, Keating PA. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997; 101: 3728-40.
14. Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE). Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1983.
15. Grant KW, Ardell LA, Kuhl PK, Sparks DW. The transmission of prosodic information via an electrotactile speechreading aid. Ear and Hearing 1986; 7: 328-35.
16. Heaton RK. A manual for the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1981.
17. Hnath-Chisolm T, Kishon-Rabin L. Tactile presentation of voice fundamental frequency as an aid to the perception of speech pattern contrasts. Ear and Hearing 1988; 9: 329-34.
18. Kent RD, Netsell R. Effects of stress contrast on certain articulatory parameters. Phonetica 1971; 24: 23-44.
19. Lansing CR, McConkie GW. Attention to facial regions in segmental and prosodic visual speech perception tasks. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1999; 42: 526-39.
20. Lehiste I. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1970.
21. Levelt W. Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989.
22. MacLeod A, Summerfield Q. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. British Journal of Audiology 1987; 12: 131-41.
23. McGurk H, MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976: 264: 746-8.
24. Patel AD, Peretz I, Tramo M, Labreque R. Processing prosodic and musical patterns: A neuropsychological investigation. Brain and Language 1998; 61: 123-44.
25. Porazzo JG. Prosodic factors in speechreading: Visual disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Doctoral Dissertation. City University of New York, 2000.
26. Raven JC. Guide to using the coloured progressive matrices. London: H.K. Lewis, 1965.
27. Rey A. L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encephalopathy traumatique. Archives de Psychologie 1941; 28: 286-340.
28. Risberg A, Lubker J. Prosody and speechreading. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress Report Status Report 1978; 4: 1-16.
29. Steinke WR, Cuddy LL, Jakobson LS. Dissociations among functional subsystems governing melody recognition after right hemisphere damage. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2001; 18: 411-37.
30. Stone CP, Girdner J, Albrecht R. An alternate form of the Wechsler Memory Scale. Journal of Psychology 1946; 22: 199-206.
31. Sumby WH, Pollack I. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1954; 26: 212-5.
32. Thompson DM. On the detection of emphasis in spoken sentences by means of visual, tactual, and visual-tactual cues. Journal of General Psychology 1934; 11: 160-72.
33. Tye-Murray N, Folkins JW. Jaw and lip movements of deaf talkers producing utterances with known stress patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990; 87: 2675-83.
34. Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (revised edn). New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1981.