Is there anyone out there who really is interested in the speaker?

Language and Dialogue

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 283-297

  Kecskes, Istvan ^a  

^a School of Education Beijing Normal University Zhuhai Campus   (China)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Dialogue; Discourse segment; Egocentrism; Intercultural interaction; Privatalization; Socio cognitive approach; Speaker meaning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989367406     PISSN: 22104119     EISSN: 22104127     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ld.2.2.06kec     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aronoff, Mark and Janie Rees-Miller (eds). 2001. The Handbook of Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Bach, Kent. 2001. “You don’t say?” Synthese 128: 15-44.
3. Barnlund, Dean C. 1970. “A transactional model of communication.” In Language Behavior, John Akin, Alvin Goldberg, Gail Myers and Joseph Stewart (eds). The Hague: Mouton.
4. Buber, Martin. 1955. “Dialogue.” In Between Man and Man, Ronald Gregor Smith (Trans), 1-39. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
5. Burton-Roberts, Noel. 2005. “Robyn Carston on semantics, pragmatics and ‘encoding’.” Journal of Linguistics 41: 389-407.
6. Capone, Alessandro. 2008. “Are explicatures cancellable? Towards a theory of the speaker’s in-tentionality.” Intercultural Pragmatics 6.1: 55-83.
7. Carston, Robin. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Carston, Robin. 2004. “Explicature and semantics.” In Semantics: A reader, Steven Davis and Brendan Gillon (eds), 817-845. Oxford: Oxford University Press
9. Cooren, François. 2010. Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, incarnation, and ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10. de Saussure Louis. 2007. “Pragmatic issues in discourse analysis.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Dsciplines 1.1: 179-195.
11. Evanoff, Richard. 2000. “The concept of “third cultures” in intercultural ethics.” Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 10: 126-129.
12. Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech acts, Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds), 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
13. Horn, Laurence R. 2007. “Neo-Gricean pragmatics: A Manichaean manifesto.” In Pragmatics, Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), 158-183. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
14. House, Juliane. 2002. “Developing pragmatic competence in English as a lingua franca.” In Lingua Franca Communication, Karlfried Knapp and Christiane Meierkord (eds), 245-267. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
15. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. 2005. Default Semantics. Foundations of a compositional theory of acts of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Kecskes, Istvan. 2007. “Formulaic language in English Lingua Franca.” In Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects, Istvan Kecskes and Laurence Horn (eds), 191-219. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Kecskes, Istvan. 2008. “Dueling context: A dynamic model of meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 40.3: 385-406.
18. Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. “The paradox of communication: A socio-cognitive approach.” Pragmatics and Society 1.1: 50-73.
19. Kecskes, Istvan and Zhang, Fenghui. 2009. “Activating, seeking and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach.” Pragmatics and Cognition. 17.2: 331-355.
20. Levinson, Stephen C. 2006. “Cognition at the heart of human interaction.” Discourse Studies 8: 85-93.
21. Moeschler, Jacques. 2004. “Intercultural Pragmatics: a cognitive approach.” Intercultural Pragmatics 1.1: 49-70.
22. Philip, Gill. 2005. “Figurative language and the advanced learner.” Research News: The Newsletter of the IATEFL Research SIG 16: 16-20.
23. Puig, Margarida Bassols. 2003. “Pragmatics and discourse analysis.” Noves SL. Revista de Sociolingüistica. http://www.gencat.cat/llengua/noves Winter 2003.
24. Saul, Jennifer. 2002. “What is said and psychological reality: Grice’s project and relevance theorists’ criticisms.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 347-72.
25. Searle, John. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.
26. Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, Blackwell and Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Taboada, Maite and Mann, William C. 2006. “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking back and moving ahead.” Discourse Studies 8.3: 423-459.
28. Tracy, Karen and Craig, Robert T. 2010. “Studying interaction in order to cultivate communicative practices.” In New Adventures in Language and Interaction, Jürgen Streeck (ed.), 145-166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Van Dijk Teun. 2008. Discourse and Context: A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Weigand, Edda and Dascal, Marcelo (eds). 2001. Negotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 214).
31. Weigand, Edda (ed.). 2004. Emotions in Dialogic Interaction. Advances in the complex. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 248).
32. Weigand, Edda. 2006. “Argumentation-The mixed game.” Argumentation 20.1: 59-87.
33. Weigand, Edda. 2010a. “Language as dialogue.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7.3: 505-515.
34. Weigand, Edda. 2010b. Dialogue: The mixed game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.