Argumentation: The mixed game

Argumentation

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 59-87

  Weigand, Edda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action games; Argumentation; Competence in performance; Dialogue; Emotion; Persuasion; Rationality; Reason; Rhetoric; Speech act theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748801985     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-006-9000-4     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Cattani, A.: 2001, Botta e risposta. L'arte della replica, II Mulino, Bologna.
2. Damasio, A.: 2000, The Feeling of what Happens, Body, emotion and the making of consciousness, Vintage, London.
3. Dascal, M.: 1994, 'Speech Act Theory and Gricean Pragmatics: Some differences of detail that make a difference', in S. L. Tsohatzidis, (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory. Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, pp. 323-334, Routledge, London, New York.
4. Dascal, M. and A. G. Gross: 1999, The Marriage of Pragmatics and Rhetoric, Philosophy and Rhetoric 32(2),107-130.
5. Harris, R.: 1981, The Language Myth, Duckworth, London.
6. Harris, R.: 1998, Introduction to Integrational Linguistics, Elsevier, Oxford.
7. Jacobs, S. and S. Jackson: 1982, 'Conversational Argument: A discourse analytic approach', in J. R. Cox and C. A. Willard, (eds.), Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, pp. 205-237, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Edwardsville.
8. Kallmeyer, W.: 1996, Gesprächsrhetorik, Rhetorische Verfahren im Gesprächsprozess, Narr, Tübingen.
9. Martinet, A.: 1975, 'Functional Linguistics. La linguistique fonctionnelle' in: A. Martinet, Studies in Functional Syntax. Études de syntaxe fonctionnelle, Fink, München, pp. 9-81.
10. Moeschler, J.: 1985, Argumentation et Conversation, Élé ments pour une analyse pragmatique du discours, Hatier, Paris.
11. Perelman, C.: 1977, L'empire rhétorique, Rhétorique et argumentation, J. Vrin, Paris.
12. Piattelli Palmarini, M.: 1995, L'arte di persuadere, Come impararla, come esercitarla, come difendersene, Mondatori, Milano.
13. Plantin, C.: 1996, L'argumentation, Seuil, Paris.
14. Prigogine, I.: 1997, The End of Certainty. Time. Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature, The Free Press, New York etc.
15. Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff and G. Jefferson: 1978, 'A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation', in J. N. Schenkein, (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, pp. 7-56, Academic Press, New York etc.
16. Searle, J. R.: 1972, Chomsky's Revolution in Linguistics. The New York Review of Books 18(12), June 29, 16-24.
17. Searle, J., R.: 1979, 'A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts', in J. R. Searle, (ed.), Expression and Meaning, Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, pp. 1-29, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge etc.
18. Searle J. R.: 1992, 'Conversation' in Searle J. R., et al. (On) Searle on Conversation, Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 7-30.
19. Stati, S.: 2002, Principi di analisi argomentativa, Retorica, logica, linguistica, Pàtron editore, Bologna.
20. Toulmin, S.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, At the University Press, Cambridge.
21. Toulmin, S.: 2001, Return to Reason, Harvard University Press, Cambridge/Mass., London.
22. F. H. Eemeren van, (ed.): 2001, Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
23. Eemeren, F. H. and P Houtlosser: 1999, Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse, Discourse Studies 1, 479-497.
24. Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, Foris, Dordrecht, Cinnaminson.
25. Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 2004, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Eemeren, F. H., R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson and S. Jacobs: 1993, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, London.
27. Rees, M. A: 1992, The Adequacy of Speech Act Theory for Explaining Conversational Phenomena: A response to some conversation analytical critics, Journal of Pragmatics 17, 31-47.
28. Weigand, E: 1988, Historische Sprachpragmatik am Beispiel: Gesprächsstrukturen im Nibelungenlied, Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum und deutsche Literatur 117, 159-173.
29. Weigand, E. 1999, 'Rhetoric and Argumentation in a Dialogic Perspective, in: Rigotti E. (ed., in collaboration with S. Cigada), Rhetoric and Argumentation, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 53-69.
30. Weigand, E.: 2000a, 'The Dialogic Action Game', in M. Coulthard, J. Cotterill and F. Rock, (eds.), Dialogue Analysis VII. Working with dialogue, pp. 1-18, Niemeyer, Tübingen.
31. Weigand, E.: 2000b, 'Coherence in Discourse: A never-ending problem', in S. Beckmann, P.-P. König and G. Wolf, (eds.), Sprachspiel und Bedeutung. Festschrift für Franz Hundsnurscher zum 65. Geburtstag, pp. 267-274, Niemeyer, Tübingen.
32. Weigand, E.: 2001, 'Games of Power', in E. Weigand and M. Dascal, (eds.), Negotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction, pp. 63-76, Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia.
33. Weigand, E.: 2002, The Language Myth and Linguistics Humanised', in R. Harris, (ed.), The Language Myth in Western Culture, pp. 55-83, Curzon, Richmond, Surrey.
34. Weigand, E.: 2003a, Argomentazione giuridica, uno sguardo europeo, in A. Mariani Marini (a cura di), Teoria e tecnica dell'argomentazione giuridica, Giuffrè (Consiglio Nazionale Forense), Milano, pp. 23-32.
35. Weigand, E. 2003b, Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik, 2nd rev. ed., Niemeyer, Tübingen.
36. Willard, C. A.; 1989, A Theory of Argumentation, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, London.