Appraisal of evidence base for introduction of new implants in hip and knee replacement: A Systematic review of five widely used device technologies

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 349, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Nieuwenhuijse, Marc J ^a,b,c   Nelissen, R G H H ^b   Schoones, J W ^b   Sedrakyan, A ^a,c  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DEVICE SAFETY; FEMORAL NECK; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; KNEE IMPLANT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE REPLACEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURVIVAL TIME; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; INVENTION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MORTALITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SEX RATIO; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; INVENTIONS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REOPERATION; SEX DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 84988892551     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g5133     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. MHRA. Medical device alert: all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements. 2012. www.mhra.gov. uk/Publications/Safetywarnings/MedicalDeviceAlerts/CON155761.
2. Sedrakyan A, Normand SL, Dabic S, Jacobs S, Graves S, Marinac-Dabic D. Comparative assessment of implantable hip devices with different bearing surfaces: systematic appraisal of evidence. BMJ 2011;343:d7434.
3. Cohen D. Out of joint: the story of the ASR. BMJ 2011;342:d2905.
4. Meier B. With warning, a hip device is withdrawn. New York Times 2011 March 10.
5. Godlee F. The trouble with medical devices. BMJ 2011;342:d3123.
6. Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom AW, National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet 2012;379:1199-204.
7. Graves SE, Rothwell A, Tucker K, Jacobs JJ, Sedrakyan A. A multinational assessment of metal-on-metal bearings in hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(suppl 3):43-7.
8. Kramer DB, Xu S, Kesselheim AS. Regulation of medical devices in the United States and European Union. N Engl J Med 2012;366:848-55.
9. Sedrakyan A. Metal-on-metal failures-in science, regulation, and policy. Lancet 2012;379:1174-6.
10. Skinner JA, Kay PR, Hart AJ. Introducing new joint replacements to clinical practice. BMJ 2011;343:d8188.
11. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). National medical device postmarket surveillance plan. www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDRH/CDRHReports/ucm301912.htm.
12. Mission statement of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries. www.isarhome.org/statements.
13. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332.
14. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453-7.
15. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. 2011. http://handbook.cochrane.org.
16. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-34.
17. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88.
18. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:13.
19. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-60.
20. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011;343:d4002.
21. Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J, Rymaszewska M, Gregg PJ, Deehan DJ, et al. Independent predictors of failure up to 7.5 years after 35 386 single-brand cementless total hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:747-57.
22. Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Howard PW, Blom AW; National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 2012;380:1759-66.
23. Bozic KJ, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Vail TP, Rubash HE, et al. Risk of complication and revision total hip arthroplasty among Medicare patients with different bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:2357-62.
24. Bozic KJ, Lau EC, Ong KL, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. Comparative effectiveness of metal-on-metal and metal-on-polyethylene bearings in Medicare total hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2012;27(8 suppl):37-40.
25. Weiss RJ, Hailer NP, Stark A, Kärrholm J. Survival of uncemented acetabular monoblock cups: evaluation of 210 hips in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2012;83:214-9.
26. Howard JL, Kremers HM, Loechler YA, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ, et al. Comparative survival of uncemented acetabular components following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1597-604.
27. Namba RS, Inacio MC, Cafri G. Increased risk of revision for high flexion total knee replacement with thicker tibial liners. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:217-23.
28. Namba RS, Cafri G, Khatod M, Inacio MC, Brox TW, Paxton EW. Risk factors for total knee arthroplasty aseptic revision. J Arthroplasty 2013;28(8 suppl):122-7.
29. Malchau H. Introducing new technology: a stepwise algorithm. Spine 2000;25:285.
30. Nelissen RG, Pijls BG, Kärrholm J, Malchau H, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER. RSA and registries: the quest for phased introduction of new implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(suppl 3):62-5.
31. Valstar ER, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RG. Radiostereometry and new prostheses. Acta Orthop 2012;83:103-4.
32. ICOR Collaborators. The International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries (ICOR) effort: a worldwide collaboration to advance the research methods and evidence in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg 2011;93-A(suppl 3E):1-12, 43-47.
33. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009;374:1105-12.
34. McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG, Heneghan C, Diener MK; IDEAL Group. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages. BMJ 2013;346:f3012.
35. Ergina PL, Barkun JS, McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG; IDEAL Group. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages. BMJ 2013;346:f3011.
36. Cook JA, McCulloch P, Blazeby JM, Beard DJ, Marinac-Dabic D, Sedrakyan A; IDEAL Group. IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage. BMJ 2013;346:f2820.
37. McCulloch P, Barkun J, Sedrakyan A; IDEAL Collaboration. Implantable device regulation in Europe. Lancet 2012;380:729.
38. Horton R. Offline: the scandal of device regulation in the UK. Lancet 2012;379:204.
39. O'Dowd A. UK launches inquiry into safety of PIP breast implants. BMJ 2012;344:e11.
40. Namba RS, Inacio MC, Paxton EW, Robertsson O, Graves SE. The role of registry data in the evaluation of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(suppl 3):48-50.