Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: Analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales

The Lancet

Volumn 380, Issue 9855, 2012, Pages 1759-1766

  Smith, Alison J ^a   Dieppe, Paul ^b   Howard, Peter W ^c   Blom, Ashley W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL DERBY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; DISEASE REGISTRY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; IMPLANT SURVIVAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAL ON METAL HIP RESURFACING; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84869088051     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60989-1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 8th Annual Report 2011 http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/Portals/0/Documents/ NJR%208th%20Annual%20Report%202011.pdf (accessed Jan 31, 2012).
2. Puolakka TJ, Pajamäki KJ, Halonen PJ, Pulkkinen PO, Paavolainen P, Nevalainen JK. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72: 433-41.
3. Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 867-75.
4. Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Girard J, Roy AG. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88-B: 997-1002.
5. Isaac GH, Thompson J, Williams S, Fisher J. Metal-on-metal bearing surfaces: materials, manufacture, design, optimization, and alternatives. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006; 220: 119-33.
6. Tracey RBC, McBryde CW, Shears E, Pynsent PB. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. A minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 27-33.
7. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88-B: 592-600.
8. Beule PE, Dorey FJ, Le DuffM, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 418: 87-93.
9. Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90-B: 847-51.
10. de Steiger RN, Hang JR, Miller LN, Graves SE, Davidson DC. Five-year results of the ASR X-large Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 2287-93.
11. Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom AW, on behalf of the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet 2012; 379: 1199-1204.
12. Royston P, Parmar MKB. Flexible proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Stat Med 2002; 21: 2175-97.
13. Coviello E. STCOMPADJ: Stata module to estimate the covariate-adjusted cumulative incidence function in the presence of competing risks. Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics, 2009. http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s457063 (accessed Jan 31, 2012).
14. Shimmin AJ, Walter WL, Esposito C. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. A review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92-B: 469-76.
15. Baker R, Whitehouse M, Kilshaw M, et al. Maximum temperatures of 89?C recorded during the mechanical preparation of 35 femoral heads for resurfacing. Acta Orthop 2011; 82: 669-73.
16. Wylde V, Blom AW. The failure of survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 569-70.
17. Keegan GM, Learmonth ID, Case CP. A systematic comparison of the actual, potential, and theoretical health effects of cobalt and chromium exposure from industry and surgical implants. Crit Rev Toxicol 2008; 38: 645-74.
18. Ladon D, Doherty A, Newson R et al. Changes in metal levels and chromosome aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 78-83.
19. Landgraeber S, Quint U, Classen T, Totsch M. Senescence in cells in aseptic loosening after total hip replacement. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 1364-68.
20. Smith TO, Nichols R, Donell ST, Hing CB. The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Acta Orthop 2010; 81: 684-95.
21. Van Der Weegen W, Hoekstra HJ, Sijbesma T, Bos E, Schemitsch EH, Poolman RW. Survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93-B: 298-306.
22. Van Gerwen M, Shaerf DA, Veen RM. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A systematic review of functional outcome. Acta Orthop 2010; 81: 680-83.
23. Jiang Y, Zhang K, Die J, Shi Z, Zhao H, Wang K. A systematic review of modern metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing vs standard total hip arthroplasty in active young patients. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26: 419-26.
24. Macpherson GJ, Breusch SJ. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a critical review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131: 101-10.
25. Haddad FS, Thakrar RR, Hart AJ, et al. Metal-on-metal bearings. The evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93-B: 572-79.
26. De Smet K, Campbell PA, Gill HS. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. A consensus from the advanced hip resurfacing course, Ghent, June 2009. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92-B: 335-36.
27. Sedrakyan, A. Metal-on-metal failures-in science, regulation, and policy. Lancet 2012; 379: 1174-76.