Resource Availability Modulates the Cooperative and Competitive Nature of a Microbial Cross-Feeding Mutualism

PLoS Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  Hoek, Tim A ^a   Axelrod, Kevin ^b   Biancalani, Tommaso ^c   Yurtsev, Eugene A ^c   Liu, Jinghui ^c   Gore, Jeff ^c  

^a HUBRECHT INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESSENTIAL AMINO ACID; LEUCINE; TRYPTOPHAN;

ARTICLE; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; CROSS FEEDING; ECOSYSTEM; FEEDING; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY; PARASITISM; PREDICTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES EXTINCTION; SYMBIOSIS; YEAST; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL DIVISION; CLASSIFICATION; CULTURE MEDIUM; DRUG EFFECTS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENETICS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; PHARMACOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; TIME FACTOR;

ALGORITHMS; CELL DIVISION; CULTURE MEDIA; ECOSYSTEM; FLOW CYTOMETRY; LEUCINE; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; SYMBIOSIS; TIME FACTORS; TRYPTOPHAN;

EID: 84988847906     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002540     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Thebault E, Fontaine C, Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science. 2010;329(5993):853–6. doi: 10.1126/science.118832120705861
2. Rohr RP, Saavedra S, Bascompte J, Ecological networks. On the structural stability of mutualistic systems. Science. 2014;345(6195):1253497. 25061214
3. Coyte KZ, Schluter J, Foster KR, The ecology of the microbiome: Networks, competition, and stability. Science. 2015;350(6261):663–6. doi: 10.1126/science.aad260226542567
4. Klein AM, Vaissiere BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc Biol Sci. 2007;274(1608):303–13. 17164193
5. Fautin DG, The anemonefish symbiosis: what is known and what is not. Symbiosis. 1991;10:23–46.
6. Cordes EE, Arthur MA, Shea K, Arvidson RS, Fisher CR, Modeling the mutualistic interactions between tubeworms and microbial consortia. PLoS Biol. 2005;3(3):e77. 15736979
7. Yurtsev EA, Conwill A, Gore J, Oscillatory dynamics in a bacterial cross-protection mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016.
8. Liu J, Prindle A, Humphries J, Gabalda-Sagarra M, Asally M, Lee DY, et al. Metabolic co-dependence gives rise to collective oscillations within biofilms. Nature. 2015;523(7562):550–4. doi: 10.1038/nature1466026200335
9. Shou W, Ram S, Vilar JM, Synthetic cooperation in engineered yeast populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(6):1877–82. 17267602
10. Muller MJ, Neugeboren BI, Nelson DR, Murray AW, Genetic drift opposes mutualism during spatial population expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(3):1037–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.131328511124395776
11. Hillesland KL, Stahl DA, Rapid evolution of stability and productivity at the origin of a microbial mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(5):2124–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.090845610720133857
12. Mee MT, Collins JJ, Church GM, Wang HH, Syntrophic exchange in synthetic microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(20):E2149–56. doi: 10.1073/pnas.140564111124778240
13. Vetsigian K, Jajoo R, Kishony R, Structure and evolution of Streptomyces interaction networks in soil and in silico. PLoS Biol. 2011;9(10):e1001184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.100118422039352
14. Germerodt S, Bohl K, Luck A, Pande S, Schroter A, Kaleta C, et al. Pervasive Selection for Cooperative Cross-Feeding in Bacterial Communities. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12(6):e1004986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100498627314840
15. Rakoff-Nahoum S, Foster KR, Comstock LE, The evolution of cooperation within the gut microbiota. Nature. 2016;533(7602):255–9. doi: 10.1038/nature1762627111508
16. Waite AJ, Shou W, Adaptation to a new environment allows cooperators to purge cheaters stochastically. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(47):19079–86. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121019010923091010
17. Bronstein JL, Our current understanding of mutualism. Quarterly Review of Biology. 1994:31–51.
18. Chamberlain SA, Bronstein JL, Rudgers JA, How context dependent are species interactions?Ecol Lett. 2014;17(7):881–90. doi: 10.1111/ele.1227924735225
19. Palmer TM, Stanton ML, Young TP, Goheen JR, Pringle RM, Karban R, Breakdown of an ant-plant mutualism follows the loss of large herbivores from an African savanna. Science. 2008;319(5860):192–5. doi: 10.1126/science.115157918187652
20. Johnson N, Graham JH, Smith F, Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum. New phytologist. 1997;135(4):575–85.
21. Bull JJ, Harcombe WR, Population dynamics constrain the cooperative evolution of cross-feeding. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(1):e4115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.000411519127304
22. Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, et al. Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature. 2002;417(6891):844–8. 12075350
23. Karst J, Marczak L, Jones MD, Turkington R, The mutualism-parasitism continuum in ectomycorrhizas: a quantitative assessment using meta-analysis. Ecology. 2008;89(4):1032–42. 18481528
24. Wintermute EH, Silver PA, Emergent cooperation in microbial metabolism. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:407. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.6620823845
25. Hom EF, Murray AW, Plant-fungal ecology. Niche engineering demonstrates a latent capacity for fungal-algal mutualism. Science. 2014;345(6192):94–8. 24994654
26. Klitgord N, Segre D, Environments that induce synthetic microbial ecosystems. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(11):e1001002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100100221124952
27. Breugelmans P, Barken KB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Hofkens J, Dejonghe W, Springael D, Architecture and spatial organization in a triple-species bacterial biofilm synergistically degrading the phenylurea herbicide linuron. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;64(2):271–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00470.x18373685
28. Nielsen AT, Tolker-Nielsen T, Barken KB, Molin S, Role of commensal relationships on the spatial structure of a surface-attached microbial consortium. Environ Microbiol. 2000;2(1):59–68. 11243263
29. Mitri S, Clarke E, Foster KR, Resource limitation drives spatial organization in microbial groups. ISME J. 2015.
30. Akashi H, Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. Genetics. 2003;164(4):1291–303. 12930740
31. Hardin G, The competitive exclusion principle. science. 1960;131(3409):1292–7. 14399717
32. Scheffer M, Bascompte J, Brock WA, Brovkin V, Carpenter SR, Dakos V, et al. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature. 2009;461(7260):53–9. doi: 10.1038/nature0822719727193
33. Kot M, Elements of mathematical ecology: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
34. Vilar JM, Solé RV, Effects of noise in symmetric two-species competition. Physical review letters. 1998;80(18):4099.
35. McKane AJ, Newman TJ, Predator-prey cycles from resonant amplification of demographic stochasticity. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;94(21):218102. 16090353
36. Nowak MA, Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science. 2006;314(5805):1560–3. 17158317
37. Gillespie DT, Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. The journal of physical chemistry. 1977;81(25):2340–61.