Evaluation of ultrasound velocity in enucleated equine aqueous humor, lens and vitreous body

BMC Veterinary Research

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Meister, Ulrike ^a   Ohnesorge, Bernhard ^a   Körner, Daniel ^b   Boevé, Michael H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE HANNOVER   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aqueous humor; Equine eye; Intraocular lens; Ultrasound velocity; Vitreous body

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; AQUEOUS HUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HORSE; LENS; MALE; VITREOUS BODY;

ANIMALS; AQUEOUS HUMOR; FEMALE; HORSES; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MALE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VITREOUS BODY;

EID: 84988664514     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17466148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-014-0250-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Mettenleiter EM: Sonographic diagnosis (B-mode technique) for the eyes in horses. 1. Methods and normal findings. Tierarztl Prax 1995, 23(5):481-488.
2. Schiffer SP, Rantanen NW, Leary GA, Bryan GM: Biometric study of the canine eye, using a-mode ultrasonography. Am J Vet Res 1982, 43(5):826-830.
3. Gelatt KN: Veterinary Ophthalmology. 4th edition. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Pub; 2007.
4. Thijssen JM: Emmetropic and iseikonic implant lens-computer calculation of refractive power and its accuracy. Ophthalmologica 1975, 171(6):467-486.
5. Hamidzada WA, Osuobeni EP: Agreement between a-mode and b-mode ultrasonography in the measurement of ocular distances. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1999, 40(5):502-507.
6. Gaiddon J, Rosolen SG, Steru L, Cook CS, Peiffer R: Use of biometry and keratometry for determining optimal power for intraocular-lens implants in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1991, 52(5):781-783.
7. Gilger BC, Davidson MG, Howard PB: Keratometry, ultrasonic biometry, and prediction of intraocular lens power in the feline eye. Am J Vet Res 1998, 59(2):131-134.
8. Grinninger P, Skalicky M, Nell B: Evaluation of healthy equine eyes by use of retinoscopy, keratometry, and ultrasonographic biometry. Am J Vet Res 2010, 71(6):677-681.
9. Jansson F, Kock E: Determination of velocity of ultrasound in human lens and vitreous. Acta Ophthalmol 1962, 40(4):420-433.
10. Görig C, Varghese T, Stiles T, Van den Broek J, Zagzebski JA, Murphy CJ: Evaluation of acoustic wave propagation velocities in the ocular lens and vitreous tissues of pigs, dogs, and rabbits. Am J Vet Res 2006, 67(2):288-295.
11. Osuobeni EP, Hamidzada WA: Determination of sound velocity in the lens of the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius). Med Sci Res 1998, 26(4):267-269.
12. Jansson F, Sundmark E: Determination of velocity of ultrasound in ocular tissues at different temperatures. Acta Ophthalmol 1961, 39(5):899-910.
13. Oksala A, Lehtinen A: Measurement of the velocity of sound in some parts of the eye. Acta Ophthalmol 1958, 36(4):633-639.
14. Thijssen JM, DeKorte CL, VanderSteen AFW, Duindam JJ, Otto C, Puppels GJ: Acoustic Characteristics of the Eye Lens, Volume 61. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publ; 1997.
15. Hamidzada WA: Determination of sound velocity in the preserved lens of the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius). Med Sci Res 1998, 26(6):429-430.
16. McMullen RJ, Gilger BC: Keratometry, biometry and prediction of intraocular lens power in the equine eye. Vet Ophthalmol 2006, 9(5):357-360.
17. Vanderheijde GL, Weber J: Accommodation used to determine ultrasound velocity in the human lens. Optom Vis Sci 1989, 66(12):830-833.
18. Whitley RD, Meek LA: Cataract-surgery in horses. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1989, 11(11):1396-1401.
19. Osuobeni EP: The effect of preservation on the velocity of sound through the ocular fluids of the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius). Med Sci Res 1998, 26(7):503-504.
20. Coleman DJ, Lizzi FL, Franzen LA, Abramson DH: Determination of velocity of ultrasound in cataractous lenses. Biblio Ophthalmol 1975, 83:246-251.
21. Coleman DJ, Lizzi FL, Jack RL: Ultrasonography of the Eye and Orbit. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1977.
22. Shaw EM, Williams TR, Koenig JL: Structure and regional water-content of bovine, porcine, and human lenses examined with proton nuclearmagnetic-resonance imaging. Ophthalmic Res 1995, 27(5):268-276.
23. McFallngai MJ, Horwitz J: A comparative-study of the thermal-stability of the vertebrate eye lens-antarctic ice fish to the desert iguana. Exp Eye Res 1990, 50(6):703-709.
24. Dekorte CL, Vandersteen AFW, Thijssen JM, Duindam JJ, Otto C, Puppels GJ: Relation between local acoustic parameters and protein distribution in human and porcine eye lenses. Exp Eye Res 1994, 59(5):617-627.
25. Hedrick WR, Hykes DL, Starchman DE: Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation. 3rd edition. St. Louis [u.a.]: Mosby; 1995.
26. Rosenbluth RF, Fatt I: Temperature-measurements in eye. Exp Eye Res 1977, 25(4):325-341.
27. Hamidzada WA, Osuobeni EP: Ultrasound velocity in the aqueous and vitreous humours of the one-humped camel (Camelus Dromedarius). Clin Exp Optom 1998, 81(5):222-227.
28. Siebinga I, Vrensen G, Demul FFM, Greve J: Age-related changes in local water and protein content of human eye lenses measured by raman microspectroscopy. Exp Eye Res 1991, 53(2):233-239.
29. McMullen RJ, Davidson MG, Campbell NB, Salmon JH, Gilger BC: Evaluation of 30-and 25-diopter intraocular lens implants in equine eyes after surgical extraction of the lens. Am J Vet Res 2010, 71(7):809-816.