Keratometry, ultrasonic biometry, and prediction of intraocular lens power in the feline eye

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 131-134

  Gilger, Brian C ^a   Davidson, Michael G ^a   Howard, Peter B ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CAT; CAT DISEASE; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CORNEA; DOG; ECHOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; LENS IMPLANT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROGNOSIS;

ANIMALS; CAT DISEASES; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CATS; CORNEA; DOGS; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 0031992262     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gaiddon J, Rosolen SG, Steru L, et al. Use of biometry and keratometry for determining optimal power for intraocular lens implants in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1991;52:781-783.
2. Davidson MG, Murphy CJ, Nasisse MP, et al. Refractive state of aphakic and pseudophakic eyes of dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54:174-177.
3. Coile DC, O'Keefe LP. Schematic eyes for domestic animals. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1988;8:215-220.
4. El-Bab MR, Mish NA, Hifny A, et al. Surgical anatomy of the lens in different domestic animals. Anat Histol Embryol 1992;11: 27-31.
5. Kreuzer RO, Sivak JG. Chromatic aberration of vertebrate lenses. Ophthalmic Phys Opt 1985;5:33-42.
6. Tanimura RO. Comparative morphology of the bulbus oculi of domestic animals revealed by scanning electron microscopy. Jpn J Vet Sci 1977;39:643-656.
7. Vakkur GJ, Bishop PO. The schematic eye in the cat. Vision Res 1963;3:357-381.
8. Vakkur GJ, Bishop PO, Kozak W. Visual optics in the cat, including posterior nodal distance and retinal landmarks. Vision Res 1963;3:289-306.
9. Cottrill NB, Banks WJ, Pechman RD. Ultrasonographic and biometric evaluation of the eye and orbit of dogs. Am J Vet Res 1989; 50:898-903.
10. Binkhorst CD. Power of the prepupillary pseudophakos. Br J Ophthalmol 1972;56:332-337.
11. Thompson J. Intraocular lens power calculation. In: Stark W, Terry A, Maumenee A, eds. Anterior segment surgery. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co, 1987;31-36.
12. Retzlaff J. A new intraocular lens calculation formula. J Am Intraoc Implant Soc 1980;6:148-152.
13. Alpar J, Fechner P. The determination of intraocular lens power. In: Alpar J, Fechner P, eds. Fechner's intraocular lenses. New York: Thieme Inc, 1986;70-98.
14. Binkhorst R. The optimal design of intraocular lens implants. Ophthal Surg 1975;6:17-31.
15. Barbeito R, Herse PR. Problem of between-eye correlation for statistical hypothesis testing: rabbit corneal thickness. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:73-76.
16. Zadnik K, Mutti D, Adams A. The repeatability of measurements of the ocular components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33:2325-2333.
17. Oksala A, Lehtinen A. Measurement of the velocity of sound in some parts of the eye. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 1958;36:633-639.
18. Thijssem J. Acoustic parameters of ocular tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985;11:157-162.
19. Freeman RD. Corneal radius of curvature of the kitten and the cat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1980;19:306-308.
20. Gaiddon J, Bouhana N, Lallement P. Refraction by retinoscopy of normal, aphakic, and pseudophakic canine eyes: advantage of a 41-diopter intraocular lens? Vet Comp Ophthalmol 1996;6: 121-124.