Cementoenamel junction: An insight

Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 549-554

  Vandana, Kharidi ^a   Haneet, Ryana ^a  

^a Davangere   (India)

Author keywords

Cemento enamel junction; comparison; deciduous; permanent dentition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908454189     PISSN: 0972124X     EISSN: 09751580     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.142437     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Preshaw PM, Kupp L, Hefti AF, Mariotti A. Measurement of clinical attachment levels using a constant-force periodontal probe modified to detect the cemento-enamel junction. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:434-40.
2. Ceppi E, DallOca S, Rimondini L, Pilloni A, Polimeni A. Cementoenamel junction of deciduous teeth: SEM-morphology. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2006;7:131-4.
3. American Academy of Periodontology. Glossary of Periodontal Terms. 4 th ed. Chicago: American Academy of Periodontology; 2001.
4. Ash MM, Nelson SJ. Development and eruption of teeth. In: Ash MM, Nelson SJ, editors. Wheelers Dental Anatomy, Physiology, and Occlusion. 8th ed. St. Louis: Saunders; 2003. p. 29-63.
5. Francischone LA, Consolaro A. Morphology of the cementoenamel junction of primary teeth. J Dent Child (Chic) 2008;75:252-9.
6. Carranza FA, Bernard GW. The tooth supporting structures. In: Newman MG, Takei HH, Carranza FA, editors. Carranzas Clinical Periodontology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2003. p. 42.
7. Jeffcoat MK, Jeffcoat RL, Jens SC, Captain K. A new periodontal probe with automated cemento-enamel junction detection. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:276-80.
8. Carvalho RB, Rocha MJ, Vieira RS. Structural analysis of cementoenamel junction of primary teeth by scanning electron microscopy analysis. J Bras Clín Estet Odontol 2004;4:46-51.
9. Arambawatta K, Peiris R, Nanayakkara D. Morphology of the cemento-enamel junction in premolar teeth. J Oral Sci 2009;51:623-7.
10. Cate RT. Oral Histology: Development, Structure, and Function. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 256.
11. Muller CJ, Van Wyk CW. The amelocemental junction. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1991;39:799-803.
12. Ash MM, Nelson SJ. Orofacial complex: Form and function. In: Ash MM, Nelson SJ, editors. Wheelers Dental Anatomy, Physiology, and Occlusion. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. p. 119-47.
13. Scheid RC, Gabriela W. Woelfels Dental Anatomy: Its Relevance to Dentistry. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1997. p. 94.
14. Leonardi R, Loreto C, Caltabiano R, Caltabiano C. The cervical third of deciduous teeth. An ultrastructural study of the heard tissues by SEM. Minerva Stomatol 1996;45:75-9.
15. Shigeyama Y, Grove TK, Strayhorn C, Somerman MJ. Expression of adhesion molecules during tooth resorption in feline teeth: A model system for aggressive osteoclastic activity. J Dent Res 1996;75:1650-7.
16. Smith RG. Gingival recession. Reappraisal of an enigmatic condition and a new index for monitoring. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:201-5.
17. Bimstein E, Ranly DM, Skjonsby S. Root exposure in the primary dentition studied in human skulls. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:317-20.
18. Bimstein E, Wagner M, Nauman RK, Abrams RG, Shapira L. Root surface characteristics of primary teeth from children with prepubertal periodontitis. J Periodontol 1998;69:337-47.
19. Neuvald L, Consolaro A. Cementoenamel junction: Microscopic analysis and external cervical resorption. J Endod 2000;26:503-8.
20. Grossman ES, Hargreaves JA. Variable cementoenamel junction in one person. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:93-7.
21. Schroeder HE, Scherle WF. Cemento-enamel junction-Revisited. J Periodontal Res 1988;23:53-9.
22. Eley BM, Cox SW. Advances in periodontal diagnosis. 1. Traditional clinical methods of diagnosis. Br Dent J 1998;184:12-6.
23. Bimstein E, Ranly DM, Skjonsby S, Soskolne WA. The effect of facial growth, attrition, and age on the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the alveolar bone crest in the deciduous dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:521-5.
24. Armitage GC. The complete periodontal examination. Periodontol 2000 2004;34:22-33.
25. Adosh L, Vandana KL, Mehta DS. An appraisal of periodontal bone loss surgically and by radiovisiography. A comparative study. Indian J Dent Res 1997;8:27-31.
26. Eley BM, Cox SW. Advances in periodontal diagnosis. 2. New clinical methods of diagnosis. Br Dent J 1998;184:71-4.
27. Ramachandra SS, Mehta DS, Sandesh N, Baliga V, Amarnath J. Periodontal probing systems: A review of available equipment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32:71-7.
28. Gupta M, Nirola A, Bhardwaj SJ. Advances in clinical diagnosis in periodontics. Indian J Dent Sci 2012;Suppl 4:114-8.
29. Watts T. Constant force probing with and without a stent in untreated periodontal disease: The clinical reproducibility problem and possible sources of error. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:407-11.
30. Badersten A, Nilveús R, Egelberg J. Reproducibility of probing attachment level measurements. J Clin Periodontol 1984;11:475-85.
31. Brezniak N, Goren S, Zoizner R, Shochat T, Dinbar A, Wasserstein A, et al. The accuracy of the cementoenamel junction identification on periapical films. Angle Orthod 2004;74:496-500.
32. Osborn J, Stoltenberg J, Huso B, Aeppli D, Pihlstrom B. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe. J Periodontol 1990;61:497-503.
33. Pihlstrom BL. Measurement of attachment level in clinical trials: Probing methods. J Periodontol 1992;63:1072-7.
34. Satheesh K, MacNeill SR, Rapley JW, Cobb CM. The CEJ: A biofilm and calculus trap. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32:30, 32-7.
35. Vandana KL, Gupta I. The location of cemento enamel junction for CAL measurement: A clinical crisis. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2009;13:12-5.
36. Masters DH, Hoskins SW. Projection of cervical enamel into molar furcations. J Periodontol 1964;35:49-53.
37. Pini-Prato G, Franceschi D, Cairo F, Nieri M, Rotundo R. Classification of dental surface defects in areas of gingival recession. J Periodontol 2010;81:885-90.
38. Zucchelli G, Gori G, Mele M, Stefanini M, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, et al. Non-carious cervical lesions associated with gingival recessions: A decision-making process. J Periodontol 2011;82:1713-24.
39. Albandar JM, Abbas DK. Radiographic quantification of alveolar bone level changes. Comparison of 3 currently used methods. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:810-3.
40. Santana RB, Uzel MI, Gusman H, Gunaydin Y, Jones JA, Leone CW. Morphometric analysis of the furcation anatomy of mandibular molars. J Periodontol 2004;75:824-9.
41. Schroeder HE. The effects of furcation morphology on periodontal disease. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991;46:324-7.
42. Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S. The free rotated papilla autograft: A new bilaminar grafting procedure for the coverage of multiple shallow gingival recessions. J Periodontol 1996;67:1016-24.
43. Volpe AR, Triratana T, Rustogi KN. Development of a system to assess visible and hidden gingival recession. J Clin Dent 1991;3 Suppl B: B1-5.
44. OSullivan EA, Williams SA, Wakefield RC, Cape JE, Curzon ME. Prevalence and site characteristics of dental caries in primary molar teeth from prehistoric times to the 18 th century in England. Caries Res 1993;27:147-53.
45. Larato DC. Some anatomical factors related to furcation involvements. J Periodontol 1975;46:608-9.