On the predictability and error sources of tropical cyclone intensity forecasts

Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

Volumn 73, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 3739-3747

  Emanuel, Kerry ^a   Zhang, Fuqing ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Atm ocean structure phenomena; Forecast verification skill; Forecasting; Hurricanes typhoons; Numerical weather prediction forecasting; Tropical cyclones

Indexed keywords

ERRORS; FORECASTING; STORMS; TROPICS; WEATHER FORECASTING;

DATA ASSIMILATION TECHNIQUES; FORECAST VERIFICATION/SKILL; HURRICANES/TYPHOONS; KINEMATIC ENVIRONMENTS; NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION/FORECASTING; RAPID INTENSIFICATION; TROPICAL CYCLONE; TROPICAL CYCLONE INTENSITY;

HURRICANES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA ASSIMILATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; STORM TRACK; TROPICAL CYCLONE; VORTICITY; WEATHER FORECASTING;

EID: 84988369565     PISSN: 00224928     EISSN: 15200469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-16-0100.1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andreas, E. L, L. Mahrt, and D. Vickers, 2015: An improved bulk air-sea surface flux algorithm, including spray-mediated transfer. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 642-654, doi:10.1002/qj.2424.
2. Buizza, R., and M. Leutbecher, 2015: The forecast skill horizon. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 3366-3382, doi:10.1002/qj.2619.
3. Cangialosi, J. P., and J. L. Franklin, 2013: 2013 National Hurricane Center forecast verification report. NHC Rep., 84 pp. [Available online at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pdfs/Verification_2013.pdf.]
4. DeMaria, M., C. R. Sampson, J. A. Knaff, and K. D. Musgrave, 2014: Is tropical cyclone intensity guidance improving? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 387-398, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00240.1.
5. Emanuel, K., C. DesAutels, C. Holloway, and R. Korty, 2004: Environmental control of tropical cyclone intensity. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 843-858, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0843: ECOTCI>2.0.CO;2.
6. Emanuel, K., S. Ravela, E. Vivant, and C. Risi, 2006: A statistical deterministic approach to hurricane risk assessment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 299-314, doi:10.1175/BAMS-87-3-299.
7. Emanuel, K., R. Sundararajan, and J. Williams, 2008: Hurricanes and global warming: Results from downscaling IPCC AR4 simulations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 347-367, doi:10.1175/BAMS-89-3-347.
8. Gall, R., J. Franklin, F. Marks, E. N. Rappaport, and F. Toepfer, 2013: The Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project. Bull. Amer.Meteor. Soc., 94, 329-343, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00071.1.
9. Gopalakrishnan, S. G., F. Marks, X. Zhang, J.-W. Bao, K.-S. Yeh, and R. Atlas, 2011: The ExperimentalHWRFSystem:Astudy on the influence of horizontal resolution on the structure and intensity changes in tropical cyclones using an idealized framework. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 1762-1784, doi:10.1175/2010MWR3535.1.
10. Green, B. W., and F. Zhang, 2014: Sensitivity of tropical cyclone simulations to parametric uncertainties in air-sea fluxes and implications for parameter estimation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 2290-2308, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-13-00208.1.
11. Green, B. W., and F. Zhang, 2015: Numerical simulations of Hurricane Katrina (2005) in the turbulent gray zone. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 7, 142-161, doi:10.1002/2014MS000399.
12. Judt, F., S. S. Chen, and J. Berner, 2016: Predictability of tropical cyclone intensity: Scale-dependent forecast error growth in high-resolution stochastic kinetic-energy backscatter ensembles. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 43-57, doi:10.1002/qj.2626.
13. Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437-471, doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2.
14. Kaplan, J., and Coauthors, 2015: Evaluating environmental impacts on tropical cyclone rapid intensification predictability utilizing statistical models. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 1374-1396, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-15-0032.1.
15. Kurihara, Y., R. E. Tuleya, and M. A. Bender, 1998: The GFDL Hurricane Prediction System and its performance in the 1995 hurricane season. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 1306-1322, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1306:TGHPSA>2.0.CO;2.
16. Landsea, C. W., and J. L. Franklin, 2013:Atlantic hurricane database uncertainty and presentation of a new database format. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 3576-3592, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00254.1.
17. Lin, I.-I., C.-C. Wu, K. Emanuel, I.-H. Lee, C.-R. Wu, and I.-F. Pun, 2005: The interaction of Supertyphoon Maemi (2003) with a warm ocean eddy. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 2635-2649, doi:10.1175/MWR3005.1.
18. Lorenz, E. N., 1969: Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 636-646, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1969)26<636:APARBN>2.0.CO;2.
19. Moon, I.-J., I. Ginis, T. Hara, and B. Thomas, 2007: A physicsbased parameterization of air-sea momentum flux at high wind speeds and its impact on hurricane intensity predictions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 2869-2878, doi:10.1175/MWR3432.1.
20. Moskaitis, J. R., 2009: Toward improved tropical cyclone intensity forecasts: Probabilistic prediction, predictability, and the role of verification. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 214 pp. [Available online at http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/47846.]
21. Nolan, D. S., J. A. Zhang, and D. P. Stern, 2009: Evaluation of planetary boundary layer parameterizations in tropical cyclones by comparison of in situ observations and highresolution simulations of Hurricane Isabel (2003). Part I: Initialization, maximumwinds, and the outer-core boundary layer. Mon.Wea. Rev., 137, 3651-3674, doi:10.1175/2009MWR2785.1.
22. Palmer, T.N., A.Döring, and G. Seregin, 2014:The real butterfly effect. Nonlinearity, 27, R123-R141, doi:10.1088/0951-7715/27/9/R123.
23. Ravela, S., K. Emanuel, and D. McLaughlin, 2007: Data assimilation by field alignment. Physica D, 230, 127-145, doi:10.1016/j.physd.2006.09.035.
24. Rotunno, R., and C. Snyder, 2008: A generalization of Lorenz's model for the predictability of flows with many scales of motion. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1063-1075, doi:10.1175/2007JAS2449.1.
25. Rotunno, R., Y. Chen, W.Wang, C. Davis, J. Dudhia, and C. L. Holland, 2009: Large-eddy simulation of an idealized tropical cyclone. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 1783-1788, doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2884.1.
26. Ruf, C. S., and Coauthors, 2016: New ocean winds satellite mission to probe hurricanes and tropical convection. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 385-395, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00218.1.
27. Sun, Y. Q., and F. Zhang, 2016: Intrinsic versus practical limits of atmospheric predictability and the significance of the butterfly effect. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 1419-1438, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-15-0142.1.
28. Tang, B., and K. Emanuel, 2010: Midlevel ventilation's constraint on tropical cyclone intensity. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 1817-1830, doi:10.1175/2010JAS3318.1.
29. Tao, D., and F. Zhang, 2015: Effects of vertical wind shear on the predictability of tropical cyclones: Practical versus intrinsic limit. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 7, 1534-1553, doi:10.1002/2015MS000474.
30. Weng, Y., and F. Zhang, 2016: Advances in convection-permitting tropical cyclone analysis and prediction through EnKF assimilation of reconnaissance aircraft observations. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, doi:10.2151/jmsj.2016-018, in press.
31. Yablonsky, R. M., and I. Ginis, 2009: Limitation of onedimensional ocean models for coupled hurricane-ocean model forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 4410-4419, doi:10.1175/2009MWR2863.1.
32. Zhang, F., and D. Tao, 2013: Effects of vertical wind shear on the predictability of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 975-983, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-12-0133.1.
33. Zhang, F., and Y. Weng, 2015: Predicting hurricane intensity and associated hazards. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 96, 25-33, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00231.1.
34. Zhang, F., N. Bei, R. Rotunno, C. Snyder, and C. C. Epifanio, 2007: Mesoscale predictability of moist baroclinic waves: Convection-permitting experiments and multistage error growth dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3579-3594, doi:10.1175/JAS4028.1.
35. Zhang, F., M. Minimide, and E. E. Clothiaux, 2016: Potential impacts of assimilating all-sky satellite radiances from GOES-R on convection-permitting analysis and prediction of tropical cyclones throughEnKF assimilation of reconnaissance aircraft observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2954-2963, doi:10.1002/2016GL068468.
36. Zhang, Y., Z. Meng, F. Zhang, and Y. Weng, 2014: Predictability of tropical cyclone intensity evaluated through 5-yr forecasts with a convection-permitting regional-scale model in the Atlantic basin. Wea. Forecasting, 29, 1003-1022, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-13-00085.1.